On one side, we have a hereditary dictatorship that has a track record of genocidal attacks on its own people. On the other side, we have an aggregation of impotent secularists and radical Sunni Islamists with a track record of mass-murder attack on civilians. The question isn’t which would use chemical weapons to further their cause, it’s which wouldn’t, and the answer is neither. Unless we start bombing everyone, it’s difficult to see why we’d want to intervene at all, except to grab or neutralize whatever stores of chemical weapons we can find.
There are no good guys in Syria's civil war, folks. The Assad regime is horrific, and the rebels are killers as well. If there's an ultimate big bad itself, it's Syria's military. With the death toll above six figures and at least that many fleeing as refugees, it's good to remember that "intervening" in Iraq and Afghanistan didn't exactly go well, and in Libya we traded Qaddafi for an unstable cease fire that probably won't last the year.
And yet odds are very good we'll be in Syria very soon.
1 comment:
This is not a left or right issue. To me this is a sane issue.Before anyone wants to go in ala john wayne you better read up on the various ethnic and religious actors in Syria and the area
Post a Comment