Showing posts with label Dramatic Prairie Dog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dramatic Prairie Dog. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Last Call

Pat Buchanan on GOP demographics:
"There's a real demographic problem with the Republican Party," Buchanan said. "It is a heavily white party, quite frankly. And as a share of the electorate, that is diminishing and Hispanics are growing very rapidly, Asians are growing rapidly, and by two-thirds they tend to vote Democratic."
You mean the GOP is full of white people?!?

(Woot, Dramatic Prairie Dog!)

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

In The Tank For Obama

Malkinvania is stroking over the fact that tomorrow's debate moderator, PBS's Gwen Ifill, is clearly in the tank for Obama because...wait for it...SHE'S BLACK.

Random House, her publisher, is already busy hyping the book with YouTube clips of Ifill heaping praise on her subjects, including Obama and Obama-endorsing Mass. Gov. Deval Patrick. The official promo for the book gushes:

"In 'The Breakthrough,' veteran journalist Gwen Ifill surveys the American political landscape, shedding new light on the impact of Barack Obama's stunning presidential campaign and introducing the emerging young African American politicians forging a bold new path to political power... Drawing on interviews with power brokers like Sen. Obama, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, Vernon Jordan, the Rev. Jesse Jackson and many others, as well as her own razor-sharp observations and analysis of such issues as generational conflict and the 'black enough' conundrum, Ifill shows why this is a pivotal moment in American history."

Ifill and her publisher are banking on an Obama/Biden win to buoy her book sales. The moderator expected to treat both sides fairly has grandiosely declared this the "Age of Obama." Can you imagine a right-leaning journalist writing a book about the "stunning" McCain campaign and its "bold" path to reform timed for release on Inauguration Day -- and then expecting a slot as a moderator for the nation's sole vice presidential debate?
So, in summary:
  1. Gwen Ifill is a political journalist and commentator who is black.
  2. Gwen Ifill wrote a book on the black political experience from the viewpoint of a black political journalist and commentator.
  3. This book includes information on Barack Obama who, if you are just joining us, is also black.
  4. Since we have established Gwen Ifill is black and Barack Obama is black, Gwen Ifill has a clear bias towards Barack Obama.
  5. Gwen Ifill should therefore NOT be allowed to moderate the debate between two people who are not Barack Obama, and are not black.
Or, in other words:
"WE HAVE CAUGHT YOU STOOPID LIBERALS!"

"The fact that Gwen Ifill is a woman and Sarah Palin is a woman and Malkinvania is a woman of course all have nothing to do with what clearly is Gwen Ifill's clear and visible bias towards Barack Obama because she is black! We win!"

(like this.)

[UPDATE] Ifill's book contract was public knowledge weeks before she was agreed to by the McSame camp. This only became an issue 12 hours ago because Malkinvania said so.

Game over.

Monday, August 25, 2008

Well Here's A Possible Sign Of The Village's Intentions

Every now and then they let you see their poker hand while they are reaching for the Cheetos. Guess who Bill Kristol is pimping for McSame's Veep from his NY Times column? Go on, guess.
So what’s to be done? McCain could well decide the obstacles to Pawlenty and Romney aren’t insuperable, and pick one of them. He could choose a different Republican governor or ex-governor, senator or congressman. Or he could decide that Obama’s conventional pick of Biden allows him to seize the moment by making a bold choice. He could select the person he would really like to have by his side in the White House — but whose selection would cause palpitations among many of his staffers and supporters: the independent Democratic senator from Connecticut, Joe Lieberman.
Now, picture every neo-con wingnut crackpot in America simultaneously doing THIS.

"Joe Lieberman? ARE YOU MAD?!?"

Oh, but it gets better.

Now as a matter of governance, there’s no reason to think this would much matter. McCain has made clear his will be a pro-life administration. And as a one-off, quasi-national-unity ticket, with Lieberman renouncing any further ambition to run for the presidency, a McCain-Lieberman administration wouldn’t threaten the continuance of the G.O.P. as a pro-life party. In other areas, no one seriously thinks the policies of a McCain-Lieberman administration would be appreciably different from those, say, of a McCain-Pawlenty administration.

Would McCain-Lieberman have a better prospect of winning than the more conventional alternatives? If they could get over the early hurdles of a messy convention and an awful lot of conservative angst and anger, I’ve come to think so.


"Joe Lieberman IS A DEMOCRAT YOU IDIOT!"
Obama and Biden will try to frame the presidential race as a normal Democratic-Republican choice. If they can do that, they should win. That would be far more difficult against a McCain-Lieberman ticket. The charge that McCain would merely mean a third Bush term would also tend to fall flat. And an unorthodox “country first” Lieberman selection would reinforce what has been attractive about McCain, and what has allowed him to run ahead of — though not yet enough ahead of — the generic Republican ballot.

A Lieberman pick should help with ticket splitters. But can such a ticket hold the support of pro-lifers, conservatives and Republicans? If you’re conscientiously pro-life, you will have reservations about a pro-abortion-rights V.P. If you’re a proud conservative, Lieberman hasn’t been one. If you’re a loyal Republican, you’d much prefer someone from within the ranks.


"Joe Lieberman IS STILL A DEMOCRAT YOU FLAMING MORONIC IDIOT!"
But if you’re pro-life, conservative and/or Republican, you certainly don’t want Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid running the country. If a McCain-Lieberman ticket is the best way to thwart that prospect, you could probably learn to live with it — even perhaps to like it.

And Hillary supporters could protest Obama’s glass ceiling by voting for John McCain and the Democratic Party’s 2000 vice presidential nominee.

"Oh. Well why didn't you SAY SO EARLIER!?!?"

"...we are watching you, you liberal New York Times Pinko Commie."

(Man, that was a four prairie dogger. Damn you Bill Kristol.)

Related Posts with Thumbnails