This Week's WTH - Moose & Squirrel Matinee

What happens when a bigoted old fart has a long, stuttering brain fart on television?  One minute and six seconds of YouTube so-awful-it's-good hilarity. 

Robertson: Well, it’s the left; it’s this culture of death. The far left is livid about killing babies. They want to kill to do this, they want to destroy. You go back, and I don’t want to play all this psychological stuff but nevertheless, if a woman is a lesbian, what advantage does she have over a married woman? Or what deficiency does she have?

Meeuwsen:  [pause] Well, she can’t have children.

Robertson: That’s exactly right. And so if these married women don’t have children, if they abort their babies, then that kind of puts them on a level playing field. And you say, nobody’s there to express that? Isn’t that shocking, well think about it a little bit ladies and gentlemen.

He wants us to think about it a little bit?  Okay, but he better take his turn first.

Am I the only one who thinks he has something in common with a certain someone we know?  Robertson's comments about the "culture of death" and Palin's "culture of life" statement make me wonder if they share the same speech writer.  An auctioneer on peyote is easier to follow than these two.

Obama's Birth Of An Error

Whichever White House advisor or staffer or member of President Obama's inner circle talked the President into releasing his "long form" birth certificate?  Fire them.  Immediately.

The White House released President Obama's original birth certificate Wednesday.

The surprise release follows recent and sustained remarks by businessman Donald Trump, among others, that raised doubts as to whether the president was born in the United States.

Obama's birth certificate [PDF]

"This whole birther debate has been really bad for the Republican Party," White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said.  But the discussion is "crowding out the debate" on more important issues and is a distraction, he added.

The so-called "birther" debate is "good politics" but "bad for the country," said Pfeiffer.

Let's go over the reasons why this was a completely idiotic move:

1)  It's not about the birth certificate, it's about race.  See yesterday's Mike Signorile show post.  Birthers will not believe the certificate.  They will claim it's a fake.  The controversy will continue unabated because it was never about the validity of the certificate, and has everything to do with a several million insecure white folks needing justification to explain away how we have an African-American man in the White House.

2)  Obama, now playing along, will be attacked for this.  Would he have been attacked for not releasing it?  The last two years proved he would be, yes.  But Obama has now justified the Birthers by responding to them again some 28 months after releasing his birth certificate the first time.  This whole "controversy" is now newsworthy because somebody talked Obama into doing this.  Instead of starving the fire in the room and letting the GOP fall on its face over this, Obama has made this a "earth is flat, views differ" story.  It's Obama's word against Trump's now.

3)  Obama is now on the defensive.  By acknowledging this stupidity as something the White House has to deal with some two years into the presidency, he's assured that this is all the Village will be talking about.  Once again, the GOP lunatics are allowed to frame the issue as legitimate, and now there's literally nothing Obama can say or do now to get back on the offensive here against this.  The birther issue will now dog him for the rest of the Presidency.  Worse, now the GOP birthers will be rallying around this for a very long time.  It was a trap and somebody talked Obama into walking right into it.

4)  The Village will now never let this go.  So Obama had a nice little presser just now where he got up in front of the press and said "You know, I want to talk about the budget, you guys wanted to talk about my birth certificate, so here you go, now knock it off."  This now absolutely guarantees that the press will talk about nothing but how mean ol' Obama really shouldn't be dictating to them what not to talk about, and guarantees they will be talking about the birth certificate and not the budget either.

Bottom line is whoever talked Obama into this, well that person needs to be fired.  But in the end, Obama greenlighted this, and it's going to suck all the oxygen out of the room on real issues.  This is one of those times where calm, cool, "No Drama Obama" would have waited Trump and his idiot buddies out and Obama would have won.  Trump immediately responded that he's talking full credit for the White House's move.  Oh, and Trump now wants Obama's college records.  Surprise!

Now it's a guaranteed circus from the "carnival barkers" in the GOP all the way through 2012.  Dumb, dumb, dumb move.

[UPDATE]  Steve M. argues the other side of the coin, and I can see his point.  But this is one of those situations where all the logic in the world won't help:  racist assholes will get their dog whistle "He's not one of us and you'll never convince me otherwise" issue no matter what Obama releases, and our stupid, irresponsible media will continue to treat their "concerns" about the President's past as a "real story that real Americans care about" rather than admit it's nothing more than idiotic, racist bullshit...because doing so would mean the Village press would have to admit their complicity in selling it to millions of Americans.

Not going to happen.  They'll just push the "both sides do it, we're covering the story" crap to their heart's content.

The Target Is Roe

In Ohio, the GOP is rallying around the "Heartbeat Bill" that's advancing through the state legislature, that would ban abortions as soon as the fetus has a detectable heartbeat, basically ending abortions in the state.

Not to be outdone, Louisiana is aiming to take out the "basically" qualifier and to criminalize abortion altogether in a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade.  MoJo's Kate Sheppard:

Anti-abortion lawmakers in state legislatures around the country have already drawn national attention—and outrage—for pushing bills that would drastically limit access to abortions. But in Louisiana, one "unapologetically pro-life" lawmaker wants to go even further. State Rep. John LaBruzzo, a Republican from Metairie, has introduced a bill that would ban all abortions in his state—with no exceptions for rape, incest, or the life of the mother—and charge women who seek abortions and the doctors who perform those abortions with "feticide."

Louisiana state law calls for jail sentences of up 15 years, with hard labor, for the unlawful killing an unborn child. LaBruzzo told the New Orleans Times-Picayune that the inclusion of the line subjecting women to "feticide" prosecution for seeking abortions was a "mis-draft," and including it "would make [the bill] too difficult to pass." He promised the provision will be removed from the bill before it goes to a committee vote. But while LaBruzzo doesn't expect to punish women who seek abortions, he would still like to see doctors working on the chain gang for providing a constitutionally protected medical procedure.

The Constitution, of course, is exactly what LaBruzzo is targeting. He admits his proposal is intended as a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 case in which the Supreme Court ruled that the constitutional right to privacy included the right to abortions in some circumstances. LaBruzzo says he'd like his bill to become law and "immediately go to court," and he told a local paper that an unnamed conservative religious group asked him to propose the law for exactly that purpose. When contacted by Mother Jones, LaBruzzo's secretary said he would "prefer not to do an interview" on the bill but would possibly answer written questions. As of press time, he had not responded to our inquiries.

The point here is to get a 5-4 vote overturning Roe and criminalizing abortion procedures in the US.  Nothing short of that will be acceptable.  So they will try and try until it happens, period, wasting the people's time with clearly unconstitutional laws until they can get another conservative on the court and end it.

You would think Republicans would be worried about jobs right now, but alas...living people aren't as important as the unborn.

Planned Obsolescence

The Republican crusade to rid the country of abortion providers may have hit a snag on the national level (as Republicans were unable to defund Planned Parenthood nationally) but a number of Republican-controlled state legislatures are pushing to shut down Planned Parenthood clinics at the local and state level.  The man in the middle (and it's always GOP men leading the charge to defund women's health services) is Indiana's Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels, who is about to have either his called truce on social issues ended...or his Presidential aspirations.

Though he says he is firmly anti-abortion, Daniels has repeatedly made the case that Republicans should put aside such issues in 2012 to focus on economic problems. “We're going to need to unify all kinds of people, and we're going — freedom is going — to need every friend it can get," he explained in a recent interview.

Daniels has already taken heat from rivals and Republican activists for his approach. If he vetoes a law that takes on one of social conservatives’ biggest targets, he could make it much harder for himself to navigate the 2012 primary field. And even as he talks of a truce, Daniels has a legacy to preserve as an abortion opponent in his state.

But family planning in Indiana is a fiscal as well as a social issue. Half of all births in the state are covered by Medicaid. If Daniels signs the Senate version of the bill, he would likely be giving up $4 million in federal dollars and bringing the state into a costly legal battle.

Because federal law blocks states from choosing which organizations can provide family planning services to Medicaid patients, the measure could cost the state all federal funding for family planning. Planned Parenthood is prepared to sue if the proposal is signed into law. They also estimate that the move would cost the state $68 million in Medicaid expenses for unintended pregnancies by reducing birth control access.

But Indiana Republican wingnuts are more than happy to have this legal fight, and even happier to see the Federal government strip all family planning Medicare money from the state.  After all, only evil poor people with evil, evil vaginas would suffer here, so why would that matter to a group primarily composed of wealthy men?

Besides, if Indiana doesn't pass the bill (and Mitch Daniels decides to end his political career in the GOP) Sam Brownback will in Kansas.

"We have the prospect of being the first state in the nation to enact that kind of law," said Peter Brownlie, president of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri.

Gov. Sam Brownback, a Republican, proposed eliminating the Planned Parenthood funding in his proposed budget for fiscal 2012, which begins July 1.

"Gov. Brownback, along with the overwhelming majority of Kansans, opposes taxpayer subsidy of abortions," said Brownback spokeswoman Sherriene Jones-Sontag.

The money that goes to Planned Parenthood is sent to clinics in Wichita and Hays. They are among nine health clinics run by the organization in Kansas and mid-Missouri.

The money pays for family-planning services for low-income women. It also helps pay for contraception, pap smears and cancer screenings, among other things. It's against federal law to use the money for abortions.

The Planned Parenthood money is among $2.9 million that the state receives in so-called federal Title 10 funds, which go toward family-planning activities.

Brownlie called the plan to eliminate Planned Parenthood funding "bad policy, bad health care and bad politics."

But it doesn't matter.  Given the kind of state power the GOP now has in the backlash against Obama and Washington, the Republicans are more than happy to throw millions of women under the bus to keep the rabid tea party Christian Objectivist base happy.  That's all that matters to them, at least.  That and getting elected.

StupidiNews!

• The man suspected of planting a bomb in a Colorado mall on the 12th anniversary of the Columbine massacre is due in court in Denver today.
• Oklahoma lawmakers have approved a bill that would set the mandatory prison sentence for cooking hashish to two years to life in prison for the first offense.
• Low supplies of refining materials for gasoline in the eastern half of the country means gas prices could hit record highs before Memorial Day.
• Britain's economy is out of recession in 2011...barely...but analysts say the nation's economic growth is almost solely due to low-paying service jobs.
• Sony is scrambling to assure customers of its online PlayStation Network that their data is still safe after hackers compromised the network and potentially millions of credit card numbers.

Last Call

When Republicans rallied people at town hall meetings to stop Obama and the Democrats from having "Obamacare destroy Medicare" the people were called patriots, and the Tea Party noble Americans taking back their country.

When people rally against the Republicans for actually trying to destroy Medicare and replacing it with a health care coupon program, the people of course are nothing more than brutish populist thugs.  Ironically it's Taliban Dan Webster, the man who took down Alan Grayson, who's getting the town hall treatment.

A town hall meeting held in Orlando by U.S. Rep. Dan Webster degenerated into bedlam Tuesday, with members of the crowd shouting down the freshman Republican congressman and yelling at one another.

It was the last of a series of town hall meetings Webster has hosted during Congress' spring recess, which ends Monday. While the others were civil and largely uneventful, the 300 people at Tuesday's meeting were so raucous they were scolded by a police officer to act "like grown people."

Webster tried to go over a series of charts showing growing levels of federal spending and debt, and the reason he supports the federal budget plan put forward by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis. But he was interrupted at every turn by shouts from his critics, including members of progressive groups such as Moveon.org and Organize Now.

Boos and shouts of "liar" were mixed with angry accusations that Ryan's plan to change Medicare would leave those now under 55 without health insurance in their retirement, calls to eliminate the tax cuts first put in place by former President Bush and the need to raise corporate taxes rather than cut entitlement programs.

The people in that audience have families and a lot of problems.  And they know of many more who are worse off.  Maybe it's $4 a gallon gas and the fact they haven't had a raise in three years.  Maybe it's that they know a good person from church who's been laid off after working for 20 years at the office, been out of work now over 10 months and can't find anything close to the job they had that will pay for their kids at college, and the church is helping them now (and they avoid eye contact with everyone else.)  Maybe it's the sister who admitted last month she and her husband are now on food stamps and have been since last June, and they were too mortified to show up at Easter dinner this year.

There's a lot of real anger out there, tea party or not.  But here's the difference between now and the town halls of 2009:

Others in the crowd began yelling at Webster's critics to quiet down, at one point with the chant "Let him talk!" But the meeting frequently devolved into multiple arguments — some of them heated — between members of audience.

When one man who said he was a veteran yelled that he wanted to know why Webster was cutting Medicare and veterans' benefits, his answer came from the audience instead.

"We can't afford it, you moron!" a red-faced man screamed.

And the Republican plan to have us fight each other rather than the band together and fight them is working better than even the GOP and the corporate masters who control them could have ever hoped.  Keep that in mind when the Republicans attack the people at the town hall meetings as thugs and worse.

  As Digby points out, it wasn't progressives who changed the rules.

Why The Birthers Will Never Go Away

Via Pam's House Blend,  watch and listen as Mike Signorile spends a good six minutes here calmly explaining the facts about Obama's birth certificate to a caller in Alabama on his radio show.  It's about as informative as it gets on why it Birtherism has nothing to do with where Obama was born and everything to do with millions of people trying to justify away the fact they live in a country where the President is an African-American.



Here's the cold, hard facts about Birthers, guys.  The caller never admits that Obama may actually be an American citizen.  He doesn't want to.  That would mean he admits that America has a black President.  This guy and millions like him refuse to do this.  They don't want to believe that Obama is their President of their country.  Birtherism is just the asterisk next to the 2008 Presidential election.  He doesn't really count.  If he doesn't really count, then America has never had a black President and everything is fine.

But if they admit it, it's not.  It means America has a black President.  It means that guys like Winston here live in an America where a black guy is President.  And this is not the America that Winston wants to live in.  It means that it's an America where dudes like Winston are the minority.

And that scares the ever-loving crap out of him.  Birtherism is just the mass delusion that America doesn't have a black President named Barack Hussein Obama, pure and simple.  It helps them cope with America in 2011.  It will never go away, certainly not as long as Obama is President.

Let me lay it on the table.  It's about race.  It always has been.  The sooner people realize this, the sooner we can fight it.  The sooner the Village realizes this, they sooner they can help fight it.  The sooner we all get this, the sooner we can tell people that this behavior isn't acceptable.

So yes, instead of complaining about the Birthers, try to understand the message they are hoping to hear about Obama.

Then do something about it.

Orange Julius Gets Oiled Up

House Speaker John Boehner had a little problem today explaining to the American people why gas prices are all Obama's fault when Republicans are insisting that oil companies get billions in taxpayer subsidies.

President Obama knows all too well what it's like to feel the wrath of rankling his base by embracing compromise with Republicans on one of their ideological positions. That's why he didn't hesitate when House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) appeared to open the door -- just a crack -- to the idea of ending payments to oil companies in an interview with ABC News released Monday afternoon. 

Indeed, Orange Julius said the following when asked about ending oil company subsidies yesterday:

"It's certainly something we should be looking at.  We're in a time when the federal government's short on revenues. They ought to be paying their fair share."

Needless to say,  Obama is calling him on that, and it's been a disaster for the House Republicans all day.  How bad is it?  They're now trying to pass off ending taxpayer subsidies to oil companies as a "tax increase" that will get passed along 100% to consumers.

Behind the scenes, GOP leaders scrambled to flat-out deny any chance of the House Republicans supporting an effort to end tax subsidies on big oil. Oil companies would simply pass the tax increase on to consumers, and that's exactly what the government shouldn't do right now with gas prices skyrocketing, one senior House GOP leadership aide told TPM in an e-mail.

"There is no current plan to raise taxes on production when it is clear that those increases in cost will be passed on directly to American families," he said. 

Hey guys?  We're already paying oil companies taxpayer money here.  If we stop doing that, isn't that a spending cut?   Isn't that cutting federal spending?  Isn't that what you guys are all about?

Now they are saying cutting these "tax expenditures" are really a tax increase because the greedy oil companies will then charge the American people for every dime they aren't getting in taxpayer freebies.  This is your argument for reducing regulation on oil giants and stopping special interests' control of the GOP?  That if you dare to stand up for the American taxpayer against the oil giants, that you have zero power to stop them from making the American family suffer at the gas pump?

That's your best argument?

By all means, keep that up, guys.  Dems smell blood here and need to press this for all it is worth.  Republicans are admitting they are powerless to stop the oil companies from screwing the American family over at the pump.  Powerless.

Think about that.

It's The Simple Things In Life

Today's public service message is about passwords.  It's easy to become lazy with technology.  I hear people every day say they are not worried about security.  Passwords take too long, and they don't have anything on their computer anyway, right?  What some fail to see is that it isn't what they would do, but what others might do.  Today's Sucker Of The Day Award goes to a man who woke up to angry cops and accusations of downloading child porn.  I'll skim past the terrible policing here and get to the point: a new wireless router had been difficult, so the unsuspecting man just left it unsecured.  Somebody noticed and used that connection to download child porn, and led to the uncomfortable discussion with law enforcement. His guilt or innocence is irrelevant to my point, which is how easily  exploitable the uneducated are when it comes to computer security.  The myth that antivirus companies sell is that your computer can be locked up tight, where a super hacker ninja pirate genius can work all day to get to your hotmail and never get a foot in the door.  The reality is it just take a doofus who doesn't understand how basic security works to fall prey to criminals and put themselves and everyone in their address book on the criminal radar. Your personal and professional information is only as safe as the dumbest or most computer illiterate person you know.  Think about that for a minute.

Data services on mobile phones are common now, the exception that became the rule.  Tethering cell phones to provide convenient and portable Internet access to laptops is on the rise, which means a double-whammy score for those who know to look.  You can bet this will be a growing problem while  we are move into the still-blooming Internet age, and life without Facebook and Google quickly becomes unimaginable.  This is a goldmine of data from which criminals can discover where you live, where you work, your agenda, and for those who check the "remember me" box, even your bank and credit card info.  No antivirus or security software can replace good old common sense (like using a good password or even a lame one) because it doesn't take a genius or ninja to walk in through an open door.  As we put more and more of ourselves online and on thumb drives, this is a problem with some hefty consequences.  This message was brought to you by the letters B and Z.

Nintendo Needs A 1-Up

Nintendo is the subject of two different BBC articles.  One pointing out that they are releasing a second Wii console, the other that they have a 66% profit slump.  There is excited speculation about what the new console will bring (sneak peek at E3 in LA).  Some are forecasting more revolutionary technology, others say it will just be a refined and updated Wii.  I'm with the latter crowd.  I am a Nintendo fan and was thrilled to see the original Wii give them a much-needed boost.  But with the profit slump, it makes sense that Windows Syndrome has struck again, and we will have a nice but far from revolutionary release.  They took a brilliant step with motion-based gaming, but they have just started to explore the possibilities that came with that step.  I hope they don't fizzle now.

The Search For Terrestrial Cash

The latest victim of the austerity hysteria in Washington?  The SETI program, no longer scanning the skies for galactic neighbors.

A collection of sophisticated radio telescopes in California that scan the heavens for extraterrestrial signals has suspended operations because of lack of funding, a spokeswoman said Monday.

The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Institute operates the Allen Telescope Array, the field of dish-like scopes some 300 miles north of San Francisco. The telescopes are a joint effort of SETI and University of California-Berkeley's Radio Astronomy Lab and have been funded largely by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, who donated more than $25 million to the project.

A state budget crisis and reduced federal dollars have choked the project of funding, said Karen Randall, SETI's director of special projects. SETI put the Allen Telescope Array on hold a week ago -- a situation publicly revealed by Franck Marchis, a principal investigator for SETI who doesn't work on the affected project, on his blog.

SETI CEO Tom Pierson sent an April 22 letter to donors saying the telescope array had been put into "hibernation," Randall said. Pierson's letter stated in part, "Starting this week, the equipment is unavailable for normal observations and is being maintained in a safe state by a significantly reduced staff."

The Allen Telescope Array will resume operations by 2013, when SETI's new round of funding goes into effect, Randall said. The funding will cover the project until 2018, she said. In the meantime, SETI is searching for quick cash.

Needless to say, if you'd like to help out while the SETI program is on hiatus for, oh, two years or so, now would be a good time to drop them a couple of bucks.

If Government Works, It Must Be Destroyed

That's the Republican way.  Take for example Louisiana, Republican Governor Bobby Jindal, and the state agency that manages the insurance benefits of a quarter-million state employees and their families, the Louisiana Office of Group Benefits.

Given Republican theory on government anything, you would expect the OGB to be bleeding cash and costing Louisiana taxpayers huge amounts of red ink.  But it's not.  The office is an unqualified success.  It's so successful at managing state employees insurance needs that it's managed to gather a half a billion dollars in surplus.

And it is for this reason that Louisiana Republicans are sworn to destroy the agency.

With his state facing a $1.6 billion budget hole, Governor Bobby Jindal is pushing to privatize the agency that manages Louisiana state employees' health insurance, even though -- or perhaps, because -- it's managed to amass a half billion dollar surplus. The Jindal administration is keeping quiet on the move, while critics are blasting it as a shortsighted plan that will benefit private interests, at the expense of the state's.

Last week, just as questions about Jindal's push to privatize the state's Office of Group Benefits (OGB) were getting louder, the agency's chief executive officer, Tommy Teague, was dismissed. This despite the fact that the agency had racked up most of its sizeable reserves during Teague's tenure at the top.

The OGB, a state agency within the Office of the Governor's Division of Administration (DoA), provides health insurance, accidental benefits and life insurance to nearly 150,000 active and retired state employees and more than 100,000 of their dependents. But the bulk of the agency's work is the health insurance.

It's simple.  Jindal wants to raid the surplus, and then turn the system over to more expensive private insurers so that the quarter million state employees and their families profit insurance companies instead.  Both are currently against the law.  Jindal and Louisiana Republicans then will change the law.

A bill that will soon be debated in the Louisiana legislature contains language that appears to clear the way for the state to use money from the potential privatization of the Office of Group Benefits (OGB), the agency that manages state employees' health insurance, to help plug a budget hole.

As the Associated Press reports, the "fund sweep" bill authored by House Appropriations Committee Chairman Jim Fannin (D) proposes to scrape $231 million from state agencies and put it into an "Overcollections Fund," which would help cover the state's $1.6 billion budget shortfall. This kind of "sweep" is not unusual in Louisiana -- though the size of this year's proposal is.

"Nobody would have wanted it if there'd been another source of money. Rather than continue to cut health and hospitals and continue to cut higher education, then they chose this way," Fannin told the AP.

But the bill also includes language that specifically addresses OGB, which manages the health insurance of around 250,000 people. 

So instead of asking "Why does this office manage insurance so well, and how can we use it to get more Louisiana residents insurance to protect them to benefit the people of the state?"  Jindal and his Republicans instead want to sell the agency to private insurance companies, deliver more expensive care at a higher cost to taxpayers for state employee benefits, and then of course he'll complain that state employees have too good of a deal and must have their benefits cut.  The answer to that question is because it removes the profit motive from the insurance industry and instead aims to try to find the best care at the best price.  This is anathema to the Republicans.

In effect, Jindal's taking the money now and screwing over both taxpayers and state employees later.  He has no interest in expanding or showcasing the program.  He wants it gone.  The private insurers in the state want that money, they want those 250,000 people on their more expensive plans to profit their companies.  And Jindal will deliver them.

This is how Republicans view government:  offices to be raided, to be privatized, and to put people at the mercy of profit margins rather than providing them reasonable insurance costs.  To do otherwise would prove that government can help the people.

And Republicans can't have that.

The Blimp Is Back

Ron Paul will toss his hat into the ring today for Obama's current job.  Via Balloon Juice, the Esquire magazine profile of Paul's positions is interesting reading.

Ron Paul is, or seems to be, a very sweet and shockingly naïve man who wants very much to do right by America. But his uncompromising vision of freedom would destroy America, really, by turbo-charging the powerful and the rich, who have shown throughout history that they have (with a few exceptions) zero social conscience and very little concern for the country. Already they've grasped most of the wealth and property in the country. Those in the top percentile are perfectly happy to throw Americans out of work and create jobs in China or Mexico if it means more profits, which they then bank overseas to avoid paying the taxes that create the relatively uncorrupted government under which they thrive. Given the nearly unlimited freedom from regulations and taxes that Republicans like Paul dream of, they'd be completely unrestrained. Eventually the desperate peasantry would realize, as they just realized throughout the Middle East, that the system was completely gamed against them. The result would be bloody revolution.

Ain't that the truth.  Sunday I talked about Christian objectivism as the Golden Rule:  those who have the gold are morally superior and deserve to make the rules.  That's the center of Paul's philosophy, a sort of capitalist version of the Divine Right of Kings.  If you are a truly hard-working, deserving, moral person then you'll be rich.  Likewise, if you're dirt poor, you've clearly lead a life of sloth and vice.  Wealth is self-evident qualification for leadership.  The sin of greed?  Well, that's not really a sin, you see.

It's weird, but it's very appealing to the corporate types that run the world.

StupidiNews!

• Seven are dead in Arkansas as Midwest storms continue to drop record amounts of rainfall in the month of April.
• The law firm employed by House Republicans to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in court has backed out after several lawyers at the firm revolted.
• The hunt is on for hundreds of Taliban prisoners that escaped from a daring tunnel jailbreak in Afghanistan's Sarposa Prison.
• Sony has unveiled its own line of Android-powered tablets to compete with Samsung and Apple in the handheld computing market.
• Scientists have discovered proof of the existence of anti-matter helium, but it may be the largest anti-matter nucleus discovered for a long, long time.

Last Call

To my extreme disappointment, Boss Hogg is not running for President of Hazzard County the United States.

Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R) announced on Monday that he will not seek the presidency in 2012, saying that his supporters "deserve no less than absolute fire in the belly from their candidate. I cannot offer that with certainty, and total certainty is required."

"I will not be a candidate for president next year," Barbour wrote in a statement. "This has been a difficult, personal decision, and I am very grateful to my family for their total support of my going forward, had that been what I decided."

Barbour was on the short list for potential 2012 candidates, but got into a bit of trouble in the past few months for, among other things, praising the Civil Rights-era white supremacist group the Citizens Council.

His wife recently said the thought of Barbour running for president "horrifies me."

Not me, Obama probably would have won all fifty states against him.

Including Mississippi.  Would have made my year.  Oh well, the GOP will just have to find somebody else ridiculous to lose to Obama run for President.  Luckily, they have plenty of ridiculous to choose from!