- The man suspected of killing five people in yesterday's shooting rampage in Seattle has shot and killed himself after police closed in on him late Wednesday night.
- George W. Bush will return to the White House today as his official portrait is unveiled at a ceremony with President Obama.
- Speaking in front of African-American clergy in Washington on Wednesday, Attorney General Eric Holder warned that civil rights gains will be in jeopardy if Republican lawmakers have their way.
- Spain's financial crisis has claimed the country's green energy industry as its latest victim as those companies are leaving the country after subsidies have all but vanished.
- With the success of their Dragon cargo capsule launch last week, SpaceX has signed contracts for the Dragon's bigger brother, Falcon Heavy.
Thursday, May 31, 2012
StupidiNews!
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Last Call
The UN special tribunal in The Hague, Netherlands has sentenced Liberia's former leader, Charles Taylor, to 50 years in prison for his role in aiding rebels in neighboring Sierra Leone.
The first former head of state to be convicted of war crimes since World War II was sentenced to 50 years in prison Wednesday by an international court in The Hague, Netherlands.
The court convicted Charles Taylor last month of aiding rebels in neighboring Sierra Leone in a campaign of terror, involving murder, rape, sexual slavery and the conscription children younger than 15.The prosecution had asked the Special Court for Sierra Leone for a sentence of 80 years for Taylor, the president of Liberia from 1997 to 2003, but the judges found the recommendation "excessive" citing the "limited scope" of the conviction in some points.There is no death penalty in international criminal law, and Taylor, 64, would serve out his sentence in a British prison.
Taylor's record of crimes against humanity was purely awful. He literally tried to take over Sierra Leone by funding rebels and sending in troops and weapons across the border from Liberia to allow multiple massacres of women and children in an orchestrated attempt to topple the government there through bloody terrorism. It was moderately successful, so much so that outside funding of rebel forces was immediately apparent and pinned on Taylor ten years ago. It's taken this long for him to pay the price, but pay it he will, spending the rest of his life in prison.
Child soldiers, roving rape gangs, prostitution slavery rings, assassinations of enemies, Taylor did it all. Fifty years is a million years too short of a sentence for this monster.
StupidiTags(tm):
Africa,
Criminal Stupidity,
Legal Stupidity,
Military Stupidity,
Non-American Stupidity,
TWTIHAY 2012
Flamin' Hot Fries
Methinks the Mexican drug cartels might have bit off more than they can chew with their latest target.
Now the rumor is that the Mexican government is running surveillance operations on the cartels out of the ubiquitous Sabritas trucks (which everyone even remotely involved is categorically denying). And the Knights Templar are a bunch of dangerous lunatics even for a Mexican drug cartel. But I'm thinking screwing with a major multinational corporation is not going to end well strategically for these guys.
Alternately, here's 66% of the pitch for Expendables 3. Just saying.
Mexican drug cartels are not strictly drug cartels. One of their fastest growing markets is extortion of private citizens and businesses. Don’t pay, and you can be threatened — or worse. But largely, the cartels target small businesses and individuals, and stay away from the larger industries. Now several arson attacks over the weekend against a Mexican snack chip subsidiary might be the first time the cartels have targeted a multi-national corporation.
That corporation would PepsiCo. According to press reports, masked men attacked five warehouses and vehicle lots on Friday and Saturday nights belonging to the U.S. snack and soft drink giant. More specifically, PepsiCo’s Mexican subsidiary: Sabritas. Dozens of yellow delivery trucks — which transport Sabritas chips and Fritos, Cheetos and Ruffles (among other brands) for the Mexican market — were burned. The good news: no one was injured or killed. At least one member of the Knights Templar cartel was reportedly arrested. Video has also emerged of firefighters battling the blazing trucks and the European Pressphoto Agency released images of Sabritas’ smiley-face mascot illuminated by the flames.
“What we cannot allow is for this kind of isolated case to become generalized,” Gerardo Gutierrez, president of Mexico’s Business Coordinating Council, told the Associated Press. “The authorities have to take forceful action.”
Now the rumor is that the Mexican government is running surveillance operations on the cartels out of the ubiquitous Sabritas trucks (which everyone even remotely involved is categorically denying). And the Knights Templar are a bunch of dangerous lunatics even for a Mexican drug cartel. But I'm thinking screwing with a major multinational corporation is not going to end well strategically for these guys.
Alternately, here's 66% of the pitch for Expendables 3. Just saying.
StupidiTags(tm):
Criminal Stupidity,
Legal Stupidity,
Mexico
Just Stay Home
Glenn "Instadouche" Reynolds is back on the warpath again against college loans, arguing in the New York Post that higher education simply isn't worth the debt of student loans anymore.
And why are schools having to borrow money? Because education budgets, particularly state university systems, are being shredded and conservative knuckleheads like Glenn here are demanding that universities cut costs the same way that public schools do: fire instructors, drop classes and programs, and shrink admissions. Not that schools are completely exonerated from being at fault.
But Reynolds wants state universities run like for-profit schools. The problem is there's plenty of evidence that for-profit schools are more interested in creating profits than providing value or enhancing worth for students. When students go into debt to pay for a education at a for profit school and don't get a job, Reynolds is saying it's the government's fault for making the student loan available in the first place.
We should be sending more kids to college, not less. And yes, there's a lot colleges and universities can do in order to cut costs. But eliminating student loans and grants isn't going to lower university price tags. If anything it'll just redistribute the costs to taxpayers as there's fewer students.
It's crazy.
For students, piece of advice No. 1 is: Don’t go into debt. When I went to law school, back in the ’80s, I turned down free rides at a couple of excellent schools to go to Yale Law School, even though it meant taking on a lot of student-loan debt. I’m not sure I’d advise anyone to do the same thing today, even to go to Yale Law, the undisputed king of the law-school rankings — and I’m positive I wouldn’t make a similar tradeoff for many other places, even Harvard Law.
Debt is what gets people into trouble in bubbles: They borrow heavily because they think the value of what they’re buying, whether it’s a house or a tulip, will go up. When it stops going up, they’re sunk.
Today, the value of an education isn’t going up, but the price is. That’s a bad combination. So don’t borrow heavily.
That’s good advice for schools, too. Those that borrow money based on the expectation that tuition revenue will continue to increase will have problems, and, in fact, some already are. Instead, schools should be looking to cut costs and increase value — the exact opposite of what many have been doing in recent years.
And why are schools having to borrow money? Because education budgets, particularly state university systems, are being shredded and conservative knuckleheads like Glenn here are demanding that universities cut costs the same way that public schools do: fire instructors, drop classes and programs, and shrink admissions. Not that schools are completely exonerated from being at fault.
But Reynolds wants state universities run like for-profit schools. The problem is there's plenty of evidence that for-profit schools are more interested in creating profits than providing value or enhancing worth for students. When students go into debt to pay for a education at a for profit school and don't get a job, Reynolds is saying it's the government's fault for making the student loan available in the first place.
We should be sending more kids to college, not less. And yes, there's a lot colleges and universities can do in order to cut costs. But eliminating student loans and grants isn't going to lower university price tags. If anything it'll just redistribute the costs to taxpayers as there's fewer students.
It's crazy.
StupidiTags(tm):
Economic Stupidity,
Village Stupidity,
Wingnut Stupidity
Russian Gay Activists Arrested
My first thought was, oh that poor man, how awful it is for him to lose the right to speak his mind. Then I felt the usual eye rolling annoyance at the "wrath of God" comment, and that education is again immediately attacked.About 40 gay activists were detained by police in Moscow today while trying to demand their right to hold a gay pride parade, according to organizers of the march.The activists gathered outside the Moscow city council building, where they were accosted by Orthodox Christians before being detained by the police. The Christians attempted to break up the gathering, throwing water, attacking protesters, and grabbing the demonstrators’ rainbow flags.Gay rights opponent Dmitry Tsarionov spoke to the crowd in front of a sign that read, “Moscow is not Sodom.”“I will not allow perverts to bring the wrath of God onto our city,” he said, according to The Associated Press. “I want our children to live in a country where a sin that so awfully distorts human nature is not preached in schools.”
But then I realized... we are doing the same thing here. Don't say gay, don't ask don't tell, Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum, it's all the same thing except it's America.
I am incredibly sad right now.
StupidiTags(tm):
Bon The Geek,
Gender Stupidity,
International Stupidity
Yet Another WTH
The woman reported a male voice. The rest of the details are sketchy, but it seems to be an utterly random act of violence, performed against a pregnant woman. Because she can't identify her attacker, it's unlikely he will be caught, but one must hope for karma in a case like this.DETROIT (USA TODAY) — A 22-year-old pregnant woman survived after being bound, driven to Detroit, set on fire and shot early Saturday morning.The woman, who was nine-months pregnant, had returned from a movie with her boyfriend and dropped him off at his house in Warren when she was approached from behind, Warren police Sgt. Dave Geffert said.The woman's hands, feet and eyes were bound with duct tape. She was then forced into her car and driven to an unknown place in Detroit where she was doused with lighter fluid, set on fire and shot once in the upper back, he said.
StupidiTags(tm):
Bon The Geek,
Criminal Stupidity
Where's The Hypocrisy Again?
Jo Becker and Scott Shane at the New York Times gave us this article on "Obama's terrorist kill list" on Tuesday and it characterized President Obama signing off on which terrorists to try to eliminate thusly:
There was no deal-making process. Republicans were universally opposed to closing Gitmo and Democrats in Congress completely folded on the issue, to the point that they actively blocked any deal to close Gitmo by revoking all funding to do so. It was never going to happen and Congress, not the President, assured Gitmo would never close.
We can (and should) have a serious discussion on the President's powers to call the ball on who and when gets a face full of drone missiles, but that discussion should at least start with the truth of the why Gitmo is still open and why it will stay open for the foreseeable future.
In interviews with The New York Times, three dozen of his current and former advisers described Mr. Obama’s evolution since taking on the role, without precedent in presidential history, of personally overseeing the shadow war with Al Qaeda.They describe a paradoxical leader who shunned the legislative deal-making required to close the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba, but approves lethal action without hand-wringing. While he was adamant about narrowing the fight and improving relations with the Muslim world, he has followed the metastasizing enemy into new and dangerous lands. When he applies his lawyering skills to counterterrorism, it is usually to enable, not constrain, his ferocious campaign against Al Qaeda — even when it comes to killing an American cleric in Yemen, a decision that Mr. Obama told colleagues was “an easy one.”
Questions about the President green-lighting assassinations aside (which is another gigantic discussion in and of itself I'll tackle later) my problem is with the notion that the President "shunned the legislative deal-making" to close Gitmo. That's an absolute falsehood if you remember anything from 2009.
President Barack Obama’s allies in the Senate will not provide funds to close the Guantanamo Bay prison next January, a top Democratic official said Tuesday.With debate looming on Obama’s spending request to cover military and diplomatic operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the official says Democrats will deny the Pentagon and Justice Department $80 million to relocate Guantanamo’s 241 detainees.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the proposed changes to the bill were to be unveiled later.
There was no deal-making process. Republicans were universally opposed to closing Gitmo and Democrats in Congress completely folded on the issue, to the point that they actively blocked any deal to close Gitmo by revoking all funding to do so. It was never going to happen and Congress, not the President, assured Gitmo would never close.
We can (and should) have a serious discussion on the President's powers to call the ball on who and when gets a face full of drone missiles, but that discussion should at least start with the truth of the why Gitmo is still open and why it will stay open for the foreseeable future.
So If You Want This Money Baby
CNN asks this question:
Here's my question: Why is this even a question?
Justin Combs earned an athletic scholarship. It was based on merit, and he kept a 3.75 GPA as a student athlete to boot. if he was anyone else's son other than the most famous hip-hop media mogul on the planet, this wouldn't be asked. There's nothing stopping P. Diddy from donating to UCLA in the amount of the scholarship too. But it shouldn't be up to mob rule whether he does or not, nor should we be questioning the scholarship.
I can't help but think that if Justin's father was a hedge fund manager or CEO of a tech company, this wouldn't even be newsworthy (and my opinion that he not give back the merit scholarship would still stand.) If I was completely cynical, I'd say this had something to do with race, but of course since Sean Combs is an extremely successful businessman who obviously raised a son with a fantastic work ethic and no small amount of physical skill, that can't possibly be it either. Maybe it's politics, but if anything, Republicans should be screaming bloody murder over this. Isn't this exactly what they say the success story of a strong, intelligent black father raising a gifted son should be?
So again I'm baffled by why this is being asked at all. Again, should P. Diddy donate to UCLA in the amount of his son's scholarship (or more than that?) Sure, if I were him, I'd make that happen, I can afford to. But I wouldn't make my son give up something he earned with his own ability, especially a son trying to make his own way in the world in his father's very long shadow. And we're certainly not implying that Justin Combs didn't earn a merit scholarship, right?
So unless one of those assumptions I made up there is wrong, why is CNN asking if he should return it outright? If this was Bill Gates son, or Angelina Jolie's daughter, or Mitt Romney son, would this still be an issue?
I'd like to know.
Justin Combs worked hard in high school to improve his football game and earn a 3.75 GPA . He recently received a $54,000 merit-based scholarship to UCLA, where he'll play football.
In April, Forbes named Justin Combs' dad, Sean "P. Diddy" Combs, the wealthiest artist in hip-hop. Some say the family should return Justin's scholarship, arguing that Combs should pay for his son's education and taxpayer money should go to students with greater financial need. Other say Justin Combs earned the scholarship through his grades and athletic ability, and deserves to keep it.
What do you think? Should the Combs family keep, return or donate the money? Should students with wealthy parents have access to merit-based scholarships and financial aid?
Here's my question: Why is this even a question?
Justin Combs earned an athletic scholarship. It was based on merit, and he kept a 3.75 GPA as a student athlete to boot. if he was anyone else's son other than the most famous hip-hop media mogul on the planet, this wouldn't be asked. There's nothing stopping P. Diddy from donating to UCLA in the amount of the scholarship too. But it shouldn't be up to mob rule whether he does or not, nor should we be questioning the scholarship.
I can't help but think that if Justin's father was a hedge fund manager or CEO of a tech company, this wouldn't even be newsworthy (and my opinion that he not give back the merit scholarship would still stand.) If I was completely cynical, I'd say this had something to do with race, but of course since Sean Combs is an extremely successful businessman who obviously raised a son with a fantastic work ethic and no small amount of physical skill, that can't possibly be it either. Maybe it's politics, but if anything, Republicans should be screaming bloody murder over this. Isn't this exactly what they say the success story of a strong, intelligent black father raising a gifted son should be?
So again I'm baffled by why this is being asked at all. Again, should P. Diddy donate to UCLA in the amount of his son's scholarship (or more than that?) Sure, if I were him, I'd make that happen, I can afford to. But I wouldn't make my son give up something he earned with his own ability, especially a son trying to make his own way in the world in his father's very long shadow. And we're certainly not implying that Justin Combs didn't earn a merit scholarship, right?
So unless one of those assumptions I made up there is wrong, why is CNN asking if he should return it outright? If this was Bill Gates son, or Angelina Jolie's daughter, or Mitt Romney son, would this still be an issue?
I'd like to know.
StupidiTags(tm):
Economic Stupidity,
Social Stupidity,
Sports
StupidiNews!
- Mitt Romney has unofficially collected enough delegates to win the GOP presidential nomination by winning last night's Texas primary with 69% of the vote.
- Musical legend Bob Dylan and former astronaut and Ohio Sen. John Glenn were among this year's Presidential Medal of Freedom honorees, awarded by President Obama.
- Peruvian President Ollanta Humala has declared a 30-day state of emergency in the country's southern Espinar province as violent protests over the expansion on the Tintaya mine enters their second week.
- Facebook chief Mark Zuckerburg has seen his net worth drop by nearly $5 billion as Facebook stock has dropped 25% to under $29 a share from it's initial offering of $38 last week.
- President Obama is taking in record donations from Silicon Valley, but Mitt Romney is making friends in the tech industry as well.
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Last Call
If you haven't noticed by now, there's more than one way to conduct war against a country. Iran surely has figured that out as in addition to the crippling economic sanctions leveled against its oil exports and central bank by the US, it seems they now have a bit of a computer virus problem to boot.
Flamer appears to be an advanced version of the Stuxnet worm that ravaged Iran's uranium processing centrifuges last year, and of course there's no way to prove who is behind it, but I'm betting that if we didn't do it, we know exactly who did. Apparently it lie dormant for two years before waiting to strike, which it did last week. Some brave warrior up in US Cyber Command got a case of Code Red and some King Dons for this, no doubt.
Welcome to the brave new battlefield frontier, folks. Diplomacy through other means and all that.
A cyber-attack that targeted Iran’s oil ministry and main export terminal was caused by the most sophisticated computer worm yet developed, experts have warned.
The virus appears to have been directed primarily at a small number of organisations and individuals in Iran, the West Bank, Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates. This will inevitably raise suspicions that Israel or the US were involved in some way.
Analysts who have been decoding the computer worm, which is called W32.Flamer, have been unable to identify the source. But they say only a professional team working for several months could have been behind it.
The CrySys Laboratory, in Hungary, said: “The results of our technical analysis supports the hypothesis that [the worm] was developed by a government agency of a nation state with significant budget and effort, and it may be related to cyberwarfare activities.”It is certainly the most sophisticated malware we [have] encountered. Arguably, it is the most complex malware ever found.”
Orla Cox, a senior analyst at Symantec, the international computer security firm, said: “I would say that this is the most sophisticated threat we have ever seen.”
Flamer appears to be an advanced version of the Stuxnet worm that ravaged Iran's uranium processing centrifuges last year, and of course there's no way to prove who is behind it, but I'm betting that if we didn't do it, we know exactly who did. Apparently it lie dormant for two years before waiting to strike, which it did last week. Some brave warrior up in US Cyber Command got a case of Code Red and some King Dons for this, no doubt.
Welcome to the brave new battlefield frontier, folks. Diplomacy through other means and all that.
StupidiTags(tm):
Economic Stupidity,
Geekery,
Iran,
Military Stupidity,
Scientific Stupidity,
Technology Stupidity
A Long Bout With Chronic Suppression
Both the Congressional Black Caucus and the NAACP are finally doing something about the GOP suppression of African-American votes through the barriers of "Voter ID" and the removal of early voting laws by starting a massive campaign to register new voters and to help voters get the IDs they now have to have in dozens of states. They key: reaching potential voters through black churches.
That's excellent news to hear, and I only wish it had begun sooner. And hopefully the Congressional Hispanic Caucus can conduct a similar effort. The Latino vote is only going to become more and more important for progressives as the elections wear on, but the GOP is doing everything they can to displace minority voters in order to maintain power.
No matter how you feel about GOP or Democratic party policies, the notion that we have to limit voting to only certain groups should greatly disturb all Americans. Throughout our history, many have given their lives to help secure the right for citizens to vote. Working now to reverse that trend is simply repugnant and an affront to their sacrifice.
It's good to see the CBC and the NAACP rejoin this fight. Sadly, it seems that even in 2012 that fight will never end.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/05/28/150182/congressional-black-caucus-rallies.html#storylink=cpy
African-American churches, historically at the forefront of the nation’s civil and voting rights efforts, are grappling this election year with how to navigate through the wave of new voting-access laws approved in many Republican-controlled states, laws that many African-Americans believe were implemented to suppress the votes of minorities and others.
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus and several hundred clergy leaders from the Conference of National Black Churches are scheduled to hold a summit Wednesday in Washington to discuss the new laws, their potential impact on African-American voters and how churches can educate parishioners, help them register and help get them to the polls on Election Day to prevent any significant drop-off from 2008.
“We will have attorneys there who are well-equipped to provide the guidance to the clergy members,” said Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo., the Congressional Black Caucus chair and a United Methodist pastor. “They will understand, before they leave, about some of the new laws in certain states designed – as we interpret them – to reduce the turnout. The day is over when they could just stand in the pulpit and say ‘Go vote. It’s your duty.’ They’ve got to now be equipped with some sophisticated information to help inspire a turnout and protect parishioners from some of the schemes that are out there.”
Since last year, at least 15 states have passed a wide array of laws that they say are aimed at reducing voter fraud. Up to 38 states, including some of those 15, are weighing legislation that would require people to show government-approved photo identification or provide proof of citizenship before registering or casting ballots.
That's excellent news to hear, and I only wish it had begun sooner. And hopefully the Congressional Hispanic Caucus can conduct a similar effort. The Latino vote is only going to become more and more important for progressives as the elections wear on, but the GOP is doing everything they can to displace minority voters in order to maintain power.
No matter how you feel about GOP or Democratic party policies, the notion that we have to limit voting to only certain groups should greatly disturb all Americans. Throughout our history, many have given their lives to help secure the right for citizens to vote. Working now to reverse that trend is simply repugnant and an affront to their sacrifice.
It's good to see the CBC and the NAACP rejoin this fight. Sadly, it seems that even in 2012 that fight will never end.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/05/28/150182/congressional-black-caucus-rallies.html#storylink=cpy
StupidiTags(tm):
2012 Election,
Legal Stupidity,
Social Stupidity
Minnesota's Burn Notice
A Minneapolis church famous for acceptance of gay rights and progressive causes just happens to burn to the ground during an election year where same-sex marriage is on the ballot. That's not suspicious in the least.
And now a year later, the church is gone. But don't dare call the other side bigots, extremists, or hypocrites, because I'm sure anti-gay churches famous for their stance on LGBT issues like Westboro Baptist in Kansas get burned down all the time by extremist liberals, right?
Or you know, maybe God just enjoys burning down his own churches. Who knows. Hey, accidents happen, just like at southern black churches in the 60's, right?
According to the StarTribune, the Walker Community United Methodist Church caught fire around 8:20 p.m. Five of the firefighters who battled the blaze for hours were taken to the hospital, but their injuries were not life threatening.
“Some people at the scene Sunday night speculated lightning was the culprit, while close neighbors said they thought it could be arson,” the paper reported.
Walker Methodist Church is known within the Minneapolis progressive community as a meeting place for various activist groups. Communities United Against Police Brutality CUAPB, Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Committee (MIRAC) and the Welfare Rights Committee all had offices in the building.
In June 2011, the church adopted a statement supporting LGBT rights and marriage equality.
And now a year later, the church is gone. But don't dare call the other side bigots, extremists, or hypocrites, because I'm sure anti-gay churches famous for their stance on LGBT issues like Westboro Baptist in Kansas get burned down all the time by extremist liberals, right?
Or you know, maybe God just enjoys burning down his own churches. Who knows. Hey, accidents happen, just like at southern black churches in the 60's, right?
StupidiTags(tm):
Criminal Stupidity,
Social Stupidity,
Wingnut Stupidity
It's Surprising What One Can Do
Especially when one doesn't care what is labeled "impossible" and tries anyway.
Well done, sir. Well done.
A German 16-year-old has become the first person to solve a mathematical problem posed by Sir Isaac Newton more than 300 years ago. Shouryya Ray worked out how to calculate exactly the path of a projectile under gravity and subject to air resistance, The (London) Sunday Times reported. The Indian-born teen said he solved the problem that had stumped mathematicians for centuries while working on a school project. Mr Ray won a research award for his efforts and has been labeled a genius by the German media, but he put it down to "curiosity and schoolboy naivety". "When it was explained to us that the problems had no solutions, I thought to myself, 'well, there's no harm in trying,'" he said.His father taught him advanced math at an early age, and not only gave him knowledge but the desire to apply his talent. At this point, the 16-year-old used math that is far above his father's reach, and is humble enough to play it down.
Well done, sir. Well done.
StupidiTags(tm):
Bon The Geek,
Scientific Stupidity
Delta Blues
Delta Airlines has introduced a "basic economy" plan that supposedly offers a no-frills option. Except it doesn't.
The airline tries to spin it like a boon for customers, with phrases such as "it's all about choice" and options. But there are a few major flaws with basic economy, and travelers will find the meager savings a poor value.
First, you can't change your itinerary. At all. Even if you were willing to pay the exorbitant $50 fee to change your plans, it's simply not an option. The customer's choice is to pay full price ticket to the next destination, or take the bus.
Customers can also choose to travel light, because they will pay even for carry-on bags under this plan. It's reassuring to know that those traveling with only the clothes on their back will not be stuck with baggage fees. There's so many of them, you know.
There are other minor sacrifices, such as being assigned seating upon check-in, but the major drawback will be the inability to change travel plans, even for circumstances beyond the traveler's control. Delta says they are offering a choice, but to me it looks like they are charging a convenience fee to give you the right to pay $50 to change your plans and have a carry-on bag.
According to the article, it wasn't even a $20 savings on a trip from Detroit to Fort Lauderdale. I expect this to be a black eye for them, at a time when it's hard enough to fill planes. Delta is given the jackass tag for good reason.
The airline tries to spin it like a boon for customers, with phrases such as "it's all about choice" and options. But there are a few major flaws with basic economy, and travelers will find the meager savings a poor value.
First, you can't change your itinerary. At all. Even if you were willing to pay the exorbitant $50 fee to change your plans, it's simply not an option. The customer's choice is to pay full price ticket to the next destination, or take the bus.
Customers can also choose to travel light, because they will pay even for carry-on bags under this plan. It's reassuring to know that those traveling with only the clothes on their back will not be stuck with baggage fees. There's so many of them, you know.
There are other minor sacrifices, such as being assigned seating upon check-in, but the major drawback will be the inability to change travel plans, even for circumstances beyond the traveler's control. Delta says they are offering a choice, but to me it looks like they are charging a convenience fee to give you the right to pay $50 to change your plans and have a carry-on bag.
According to the article, it wasn't even a $20 savings on a trip from Detroit to Fort Lauderdale. I expect this to be a black eye for them, at a time when it's hard enough to fill planes. Delta is given the jackass tag for good reason.
The Invisible Sledgehammer In The Invisible Hand Of The Market
Johnny Volcano tell the truth again:
It exists to cull the weak and endorse the rich, who invest and decide who wins and who loses. And Mitt Romney wants to do that to all of America.
Sure. And Mitt Romney wants to run America's government like a for-profit enterprise. The sick, the poor, the elderly, well, they're a net drain on profits.
We'll have to downsize them under a Romney government, of course.
In defending Mitt Romney’s private sector experience Sunday, top surrogate Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) explained that capitalism can be “cruel.”
“This is the free enterprise system. The only place in the world that I can recall where companies never failed was the old Soviet Union,” McCain said on “Fox News Sunday.” “And yes, the free enterprise system can be cruel.”
It exists to cull the weak and endorse the rich, who invest and decide who wins and who loses. And Mitt Romney wants to do that to all of America.
The Obama campaign has run attack ads highlighting jobs lost at companies owned by Bain Capital, which Romney led. Host Wallace dug up quotes from McCain’s GOP primary campaign against Romney four years ago in which he criticized his Bain Capital record as well.
“He managed companies, and he bought and he sold, and sometimes people lost their jobs,” McCain said at the time.
McCain stood by that comment Sunday, arguing that that’s how capitalism works. McCain cited the example of Bain Capital investing in Staples, a successful Bain investment, before turning to attack President Obama. It’s a lack of investment in small businesses that is stifling job growth today, McCain contended.
Sure. And Mitt Romney wants to run America's government like a for-profit enterprise. The sick, the poor, the elderly, well, they're a net drain on profits.
We'll have to downsize them under a Romney government, of course.
StupidiTags(tm):
Economic Stupidity,
McCain,
Mitt Romney
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)