Sunday, August 23, 2009

Last Call

Howard Kurtz of the WaPo wants to know why "death panels" won't die and comes across the major problem of the Village.
While there is legitimate debate about the legislation's funding for voluntary end-of-life counseling sessions, the former Alaska governor's claim that government panels would make euthanasia decisions was clearly debunked. Yet an NBC poll last week found that 45 percent of those surveyed believe the measure would allow the government to make decisions about cutting off care to the elderly -- a figure that rose to 75 percent among Fox News viewers.

Less than seven hours after Palin posted her charge Aug. 7, MSNBC's Keith Olbermann called it an "absurd idea." That might have been dismissed as a liberal slam, but the next day, ABC's Bill Weir said on "Good Morning America": "There is nothing like that anywhere in the pending legislation."

On Aug. 9, Post reporter Ceci Connolly said flatly in an A-section story: "There are no such 'death panels' mentioned in any of the House bills." That same day, on NBC's "Meet the Press," conservative New York Times columnist David Brooks called Palin's assertion "crazy." CNN's Jessica Yellin said on "State of the Union," "That's not an accurate assessment of what this panel is." And on ABC's "This Week," George Stephanopoulos said: "Those phrases appear nowhere in the bill."

Still, some conservatives argued otherwise. On the Stephanopoulos roundtable, former House speaker Newt Gingrich said the legislation "has all sorts of panels. You're asking us to trust turning power over to the government when there clearly are people in America who believe in establishing euthanasia, including selective standards."

And on Fox the next night, Bill O'Reilly played a clip of former Democratic Party chairman Howard Dean saying Palin "just made that up. . . . There's nothing like euthanasia in the bill." O'Reilly countered that as far as he could tell, "Sarah Palin never mentioned euthanasia. Dean made it up to demean Palin."

Ultimately, the media consensus was that Palin had attempted "to leap across a logical canyon," as the conservative bible National Review put it, adding that "we should be against hysteria." But the "death" debate was sucking up much of the political oxygen. President Obama kept denying that he was for "pulling the plug on Grandma." On Aug. 13, the Senate Finance Committee pulled the plug on the provision, with Republican Sen. Charles Grassley saying the idea could be -- yes -- "misinterpreted."

Perhaps journalists are no more trusted than politicians these days, or many folks never saw the knockdown stories. But this was a stunning illustration of the traditional media's impotence.

Gosh Howie, you think?

I have a series of questions for the esteemed WaPo media critic:

  1. What's the current penalty that the Village media will bestow upon Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich for boldly repeating those lies all over the airwaves?
  2. If three-quarters of FOX News viewers believe the lie, don't you think there's something terribly wrong at that network?
  3. After eight years of the village carrying the GOP kool-aid, why do you think there's a trust issue in the traditional media, Howard?
  4. Don't you think there's a general problem with the media itself when it is concerned less with the truth and more with whoring itself out for the story?
It's distressing, I'm sure. But the fact is the media is aiding and abetting the death of Obama's agenda, one right-wing liar at a time.

1 comment:

  1. You know, I've been encouraged to see the MSM debunking "death panels" at all. But it will take powerful countermemeing to combat all the tinfoil hattery.

    ReplyDelete