Friday, February 26, 2010

The Kroog Versus The Health Care Summit

Paul Krugman rightfully calls out the Republicans for offering exactly zip in yesterday's summit.
It was obvious how things would go as soon as the first Republican speaker, Senator Lamar Alexander, delivered his remarks. He was presumably chosen because he’s folksy and likable and could make his party’s position sound reasonable. But right off the bat he delivered a whopper, asserting that under the Democratic plan, “for millions of Americans, premiums will go up.”

Wow. I guess you could say that he wasn’t technically lying, since the Congressional Budget Office analysis of the Senate Democrats’ plan does say that average payments for insurance would go up. But it also makes it clear that this would happen only because people would buy more and better coverage. The “price of a given amount of insurance coverage” would fall, not rise — and the actual cost to many Americans would fall sharply thanks to federal aid.

His fib on premiums was quickly followed by a fib on process. Democrats, having already passed a health bill with 60 votes in the Senate, now plan to use a simple majority vote to modify some of the numbers, a process known as reconciliation. Mr. Alexander declared that reconciliation has “never been used for something like this.” Well, I don’t know what “like this” means, but reconciliation has, in fact, been used for previous health reforms — and was used to push through both of the Bush tax cuts at a budget cost of $1.8 trillion, twice the bill for health reform.

What really struck me about the meeting, however, was the inability of Republicans to explain how they propose dealing with the issue that, rightly, is at the emotional center of much health care debate: the plight of Americans who suffer from pre-existing medical conditions. In other advanced countries, everyone gets essential care whatever their medical history. But in America, a bout of cancer, an inherited genetic disorder, or even, in some states, having been a victim of domestic violence can make you uninsurable, and thus make adequate health care unaffordable.

One of the great virtues of the Democratic plan is that it would finally put an end to this unacceptable case of American exceptionalism. But what’s the Republican answer? Mr. Alexander was strangely inarticulate on the matter, saying only that “House Republicans have some ideas about how my friend in Tullahoma can continue to afford insurance for his wife who has had breast cancer.” He offered no clue about what those ideas might be. 
And that's the way it has been since last March:  The Democrats incorporate an idea fronted by Republicans into the health care plan, and then the Republicans immediately turn against it.  As I've been saying for over a year now, the Republicans will never, ever let Obama take credit for health care reform, even if it means scuttling their own ideas.

As Lamar Alexander showed us yesterday, the only idea Republicans have is "start over."  When Republicans had control of Congress and the White House, they tacked on a $1.2 trillion prescription drug gift to Big Pharma.  To Republicans, that's health care reform.

They would rather toss their own ideas down the hole than let a Democratic president sign them into law.

Time to go it alone.  Even former GOP Senate majority leader Bill Frist admits the Republicans are obstructing too much.

1 comment:

  1. Wait wasn't the prescription drug care a good thing? Allowing moar competition drove prescription drug costs down, didn't it?

    ReplyDelete