Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Never Miss An Opportunity For Obama Derangement Syndrome

The long-time motto of the WSJ editorial board.
A mere three days before President Obama's supposedly bipartisan health-care summit, the White House yesterday released a new blueprint that Democrats say they will ram through Congress with or without Republican support. So after election defeats in Virginia, New Jersey and even Massachusetts, and amid overwhelming public opposition, Democrats have decided to give the voters what they don't want anyway.
Ah, the glory of "progressive" governance and democratic consent.

"The President's Proposal," as the 11-page White House document is headlined, is in one sense a notable achievement: It manages to take the worst of both the House and Senate bills and combine them into something more destructive. It includes more taxes, more subsidies and even less cost control than the Senate bill. And it purports to fix the special-interest favors in the Senate bill not by eliminating them—but by expanding them to everyone.

The bill's one new inspiration is a powerful federal board that would regulate premiums in the individual insurance market. In all 50 states, insurers are already required to justify premium increases to insurance commissioners, who generally have the power to give a regulatory go-ahead, or not. But their primary concern is actuarial soundness and capital standards, making sure that companies have enough cash to pay claims.

The White House wants to create another layer of review that will be able to reject any rate increase that is "unreasonable or unjustified." Any insurer deemed guilty of such an infraction by this new bureaucracy "must lower premiums, provide rebates, or take other actions to make premiums affordable." In other words, de facto price controls.

Insurance premiums are rising too fast; therefore, premium increases should be illegal. Q.E.D. The result of this rate-setting board will be less competition in the individual market, as insurers flee expensive states or regions, or even a cascade of bankruptcies if premiums are frozen and the cost of the care they are expected to cover continues to rise. For all the Dickensian outrage about profiteering by WellPoint and other companies, insurance is a low-margin business even for health care, and at least 85 cents of the average premium dollar, usually more, is devoted to actual health services. 
Who among us will stand and defend the rights of America's precious health insurance companies to arbitrarily raise rates on Americans in a recessionary hell?  I'm sure millions of Americans are very concerned about insurance company profits right now and would really like to see the government make the people pay more in order to protect those profit margins.

I'm positive that this is a winning message for Republicans in 2010, as is "Obama isn't doing what we are telling him to do."

1 comment:

  1. http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/insurance-co-profits-good-but-not-breaking-records/

    Yes record breaking profits <_<

    Check out profit margins on average for industries
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_otfwl2zc6Qc/SoMLoWBKM4I/AAAAAAAAK4g/wKdZyg5LxQ0/s1600-h/profits.bmp

    Yes...we should get those mean health insurance providers, then get the Beverage makers there after. I mean why should coke and pepsi be turning a profit?

    The bottom line is profit is necessary so people will want to pursue a job in that field. Lets face it we want our best and brightest in the medical field, and our C+ students bagging our groceries. People do not work for free, and people who are the best and brightest will go where money is. The health industry will always leave you with a sense of sticker shock because of the price, but who can really put a price on life? Sure the mob can but that's for other reasons :P

    ReplyDelete