Thursday, August 13, 2009

Refusing To Knuckle Under

Over at AlterNet, Sara Robinson has a pair of controversial but informative articles on the events of the last couple weeks. She argues that the rise of the teabaggers/birthers/healthers is all part of a larger problem, the rise of fascism in the true sense of the word, as defined by author Robert Paxton's "five stages of fascism". Robinson argues that America is currently staring down the barrel of stage three:
All through the Bush years, progressive right-wing watchers refused to call it "fascism" because, though we kept looking, we never saw clear signs of a deliberate, committed institutional partnership forming between America's conservative elites and its emerging homegrown brownshirt horde. We caught tantalizing signs of brief flirtations -- passing political alliances, money passing hands, far-right moonbat talking points flying out of the mouths of "mainstream" conservative leaders. But it was all circumstantial, and fairly transitory. The two sides kept a discreet distance from each other, at least in public. What went on behind closed doors, we could only guess. They certainly didn't act like a married couple.

Now, the guessing game is over. We know beyond doubt that the Teabag movement was created out of whole cloth by astroturf groups like Dick Armey's FreedomWorks and Tim Phillips' Americans for Prosperity, with massive media help from FOX News. We see the Birther fracas -- the kind of urban myth-making that should have never made it out of the pages of the National Enquirer -- being openly ratified by Congressional Republicans. We've seen Armey's own professionally-produced field manual that carefully instructs conservative goon squads in the fine art of disrupting the democratic governing process -- and the film of public officials being terrorized and threatened to the point where some of them required armed escorts to leave the building. We've seen Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner applauding and promoting a video of the disruptions and looking forward to "a long, hot August for Democrats in Congress."

This is the sign we were waiting for -- the one that tells us that yes, kids: we are there now. America's conservative elites have openly thrown in with the country's legions of discontented far right thugs. They have explicitly deputized them and empowered them to act as their enforcement arm on America's streets, sanctioning the physical harassment and intimidation of workers, liberals, and public officials who won't do their political or economic bidding.

This is the catalyzing moment at which honest-to-Hitler fascism begins. It's also our very last chance to stop it.

Personally, I don't want to believe that we're that close to groups of people roaming around, enforcing laws through violence. They're so far winning just by the threat of this kind of violence, but I don't see any effort whatsoever to put the brakes on. The beast is loose at this point, and I find it hard to disagree with Robinson on the point. These groups are very much sanctioned by the Republicans and are empowered by the Villagers looking for the next big story.

So how do we stop them? Robinson explores that in her article today, giving seven things people can do to try to take the country back. Way #6 seems especially useful:

Sixth: Shut down the hate talkers. In most parts of the country, the teabaggers are coming straight out of right-wing talk-radio audiences. For hours every day, they're mainlining raw emotion and toxic misinformation.

They're going put your kids before "death panels!" They're going to kill your granny! You're going to have to call the White House to get a bone set! You'll be a Real American Hero if you get out there and join the "resistance!"

Cutting off this endless torrent of lies, fearmongering and validation will go a long way toward powering down the whole movement. (Conversely, what happens when these kinds of radio instigators are left to spin it all the way out to the end can be summed up in two words: Radio Rwanda.)

The basic recipe: Record their shows. Take notes of anything they say that is intimidating, threatening, or aimed at inciting violence against a named target. And while you're at it, note every single advertiser they have.

Then write a polite letter the CEOs of the sponsoring companies. Throw them some choice quotes from these shows and ask them if this is the kind of thing they want their product associated with. (Point out that if their own employees said things like this at work, they'd be fired on the spot.)

Often, the CEO has no clue that any of this is happening and will pull the ads as soon as she finds out what's being done in her name. This has worked extremely well -- and quickly -- at both the local and national level.

It indeed is working well, as Glenn Beck is finding out the hard way.
Web site ColorofChange.org, reacting to a long line of racial comments about President Barack Obama, has managed thus far to knock loose from Beck's fold Lawyers.com, Procter & Gamble, Progressive, S.C. Johnson, GEICO, Men's Wearhouse and, just this morning, Sargento.

"We applaud GEICO and all of the other companies who have stepped forward to pull their ads from Glenn Beck," said James Rucker, executive director of Color of Change, in a Tuesday media advisory. "Beck’s rhetoric is dangerous to the fabric of our democracy, and we are heartened that so many big companies feel the same way. We won’t stop here — we’re going to continue our fight to see that as many of Beck’s advertisers pull their support as possible."

I think more than anything else, the media is the key to stopping this mess.

The Republic has survived a lot. It will survive this, most likely. But it may need some help. I know I've been fatalistically complaining about this subject, but it helps me cope with the frustration. However, Robinson's article today does give some excellent and helpful advice.

You can find more of Robinson's work over at the always outstanding and informative Orcinus as well.

8 comments:

  1. The people fighting to limit government power are fascists.

    Orwellian double speak if I've ever heard it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. But "fascists" want the state to have more power, so I don't understand your assertion, Servius.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry, did I need "sarcasm" tags?

    I'm saying our hosts assertion that we who are protesting at townhall teaparties are fascists is absurd.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Spare me the false outrage. I said it was controversial. I said the evidence is there and that I had a hard time disagreeing with it.

    This victim mentality crap has got to stop. I was unaware this article was impinging on your right to dislike the federal government.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm not outraged. I've come to expect to be called a fascist for fighting to limit government.

    http://www.google.com/reader/view/?source=gmailnonewmail#search/fascism/24

    ReplyDelete
  6. And did fighting to limit government include Bush's 6 trillion added to the national debt, or just Obama's apparent sins?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bush added how much????? You wanna do some fact checking before you run your mouth off?

    President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public debt through 2008. President Obama’s budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt from the beginning of 2010 through 2016. That includes 1.85 trillion just this year.

    http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/

    Now, that's not good but, buddy, Nearly tripling the actual figures doesn't do your credibility any good.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You're beginning to bore me, Serv.

    When Bush took office, the national debt was $5.73 trillion. When he left, it was $10.7 trillion.

    My $6 trillion was wrong. But even more inaccurate is your $2.5 trillion number...but then again if you count the mess Bush left for Obama including the TARP bailout, that $6 trillion's not too far off.

    Please, go do your own damn homework, and don't crib it from the Heritage Foundation either.

    ReplyDelete