Goodman Brooks Approves Of Presidents Who Think

How reassuring at least some in the Village find the Vulcan in the White House to be...eminently logical.

The advantage of the Obama governing style is that his argument-based organization is a learning organization. Amid the torrent of memos and evidence and dispute, the Obama administration is able to adjust and respond more quickly than, say, the Bush administration ever did.

The disadvantage is the tendency to bureaucratize the war. Armed conflict is about morale, motivation, honor, fear and breaking the enemy’s will. The danger is that Obama’s analytic mode will neglect the intangibles that are the essence of the fight. It will fail to inspire and comfort. Soldiers and Marines don’t have the luxury of adopting President Obama’s calibrated stance since they are being asked to potentially sacrifice everything.

Barring a scientific breakthrough, we can’t merge Obama’s analysis with George Bush’s passion. But we should still be glad that he is governing the way he is. I loved covering the Obama campaign. But amid problems like Afghanistan and health care, it simply wouldn’t do to give gauzy speeches about the meaning of the word hope. It is in Obama’s nature to lead a government by symposium. Embrace the complexity. Learn to live with the dispassion.

Eight years of passion over reason basically wrecked the economy, got us into two wars, and ruined our world standing and pissed off a couple billion people.  At least Brooks is coming over to see the reason in, well, reason itself.  Imagine that, a pragmatic leader at a time where America needs leadership.   Funny how that works out.

Or would you prefer President Angry being one heart attack away from President Moose Lady?