Beck's essential message was that I crawled my way from the dung pile without any help, and that's what makes America great ,so we shouldn't help anyone in trouble. From his twisted personal story to his twisted vision of American history, Beck took rapturous CPACers on a classic tour of American conservative ideology. From his paranoid delusional ranting about how liberals hate anyone successful to his Social Darwinist view of society and nature, he laid out the conservative line and took it to its logical conclusion. And the audience loved it. The quintessential moment in the speech? When Beck explained why we shouldn't be helping anyone in need: "There's some sort of element of competition to life. Oh that's not natural. Really? Go watch the lions eat the weakest." And the audience burst into laughter and applause- as I wrote the other day, these conservatives really are into cruelty, so the idea of lions eating the weak got them going.It's brutal, as Mike says...the essence of brutality. The strong must rule the weak, and if the weak cannot keep up, if they need help, if they need a safety net, they must be destroyed in order to allow for more resources to be divvied up among the survivors.
Conservatives' answer to the question "Am I my brother's keeper?" is a resounding Hell NO. And that is the essential divide between them and the progressivism which Beck describes as a cancer: progressives believe that all of us are in this together. When our child is weakened by a chronic illness, or our parent by old age, we don't abandon them in the wilderness so that the lion can eat them up (and then laugh about it). When our brother stumbles and hits bottom, we don't stand back and see if he can pull himself up by his own bootstraps, we lend him a helping hand. When our sister is abused and treated unfairly by an employer, we don't tell her she's on her own, we work with her to make things fairer. We believe in a community that helps each other survive and prosper, because we don't want to live in a world where only the strongest and wealthiest and - yes - luckiest survive. We don't have fantasies that all our success is of our own making because we know that without good families, good neighbors, good school and libraries and roads and bridges paid for by public dollars, that without all that, we'd be much less likely to make it on our own. In spite of Beck's paranoia, we have no problem with people being successful. I have never once heard any progressive attack Steve Jobs or Eric Schmidt for their success, or attack the local small businessperson making a good living because he or she is supplying products a community wants. But what we do believe is that those lucky enough to be successful have a responsibility to give something back to their fellow citizens.First Law Of Conservatism: "I've got mine, screw you."
Social Darwinism has been around for a long, long time. The basic hypocrisy of it is that without the people they consider to be peons to work for them and actually work at the jobs to provide the goods and services to earn the money to consume other goods and services, the folks at the top of the pyramid have no pyramid to be on top of. Beck knows that. He's been at the bottom of that pile. Most of us have been at one point or another, out of work, scared, hurting.
We turned to others for help. And help they did.
Beck got his help. Then he got lucky. Now the rest of America can go screw itself when beck shares his fantasy with others so they can pretend they still have something to deny people even more miserable than they are. It keeps everyone in their place: the liberals, the gays and lesbians, the minorities, the women.
And that's just how the Glennsanity likes it.
So this is ALL based off of a Glenn Beck speech? Glenn Beck speaks for all conservatives views? Well my friend you must have a window in your stomach, there's no other way you could see with your head that far up your ass.
ReplyDeleteWe live in a capitalist society where you can risk it all to prosper or fail. What scares the majority of liberals is that there is no safety net. Conservatives are not against helping people out, but are against giving them a free ride. I know it's hard for a liberal to see the difference between the two, but to think a conservative will leave Grandma in the woods to die because she's slowing them down or is a burden on life is a lie. Progressives believe we're all in this together but don't seem to quite understand there are those who may be in this for different reasons, to screw the system and other people. Those who haven't worked a day in their life but are able should not be getting a free ride and should be kicked to the street. Life isn't easy, suck it up and get a job. To think that just because I make a good living I should pay for others who won't work is ludicrous. Now I understand some can't work and there's a distinct difference. I also fully accept there are those who make more than I do and that's fine, they've made it where I couldn't.
There is help available; no one is being kicked to the curb just because they're surrounded by conservatives. You act like conservatives are all some selfish 4 year old who doesn't want to share their toy or that they think that since they made it anyone big that anyone can. If there was a secret formulat to making it big everyone would do it.
Here to blow a hole in the whole blog I submit to you:
http://www.freedomalliance.org/?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=7&Itemid=15
The Freedom Alliance, providing scholarships to children of our fallen men and women serving in the armed forces. Every year Sean Hannity holds a freedom concert and donates the proceeds to the Freedom alliance.
https://freedomconcerts.com/
That's giving back to people all over the country and Sean is a self proclaimed conservative. Guess he didn't get the memo about conservatives being stingy assholes and he should keep those profits and spit on those who lost their mothers or fathers.
Read the garbage you post before you post it and for the love of God think does this make sense? If you thought about this for a minute objectively you would see that it doesn't. You can lump republicans together as dirty bastards but there is a distinct difference between a republican and a conservative, just as there is between a Democrat and a Liberal.
Now I will never deny Glen Beck is an idiot who says inflammatory things for entertainment, but in today’s society ratings are all that matter so I don't put stock into things said. I go out and read and research on my own. To act like he is the lone beacon of conservatism is ignorant. I do not think that all liberals are "dirty libs." I think that those that are moderate haven't gotten so lost in their own self interest that they can still be persuaded to see something they may not necessarily agree with. That's the problem with Government AND Society, people who think only their side has the solutions.