There are multiple factions within this so-called "movement," and it's often challenging to keep track of what it is, exactly, that these activists are so worked up about. Much of the time, the Teabaggers themselves don't really know why they're so angry.Steve? Horseshit. Absolute, 100% Horseshit. The "reasonable faction" of the Tea Party is using taxes, size and scope of government, lobbyists and fiscal responsibility as intellectual cover for their John Birch/Ayn Rand anti-government ravings, and you damn well know it. Drive a wedge? Really? How?
But Pelosi's suggestion that the activists have a fair amount in common with Democrats' progressive ideas is not as foolish as it might seem. The "movement" cares about fiscal responsibility? Then the activists certainly would have no use for Republicans, who added $5 trillion to the debt, left Dems with a $1.3 trillion deficit to clean up, and deliberately decided that they could expand government without paying for it. More recently, the GOP rejected PAYGO and a deficit commission that they proposed. If fiscal responsibility is a top concern, it's entirely reasonable to argue Democrats are the more fiscally responsible party.
The "movement" cares about wealthy interests dictating public policy over the needs of regular Americans? Then the activists certainly would have no use for Republicans, who not only run corporate lobbyists as candidates, but barely make a move without getting lobbyists' permission.
The "movement" cares about taxes? Then the activists certainly would have no use for Republicans, who voted against one of the largest tax-cut packages for the middle class in American history when they opposed the recovery effort a year ago.
The "movement" cares about the size and scope of government? Then the activists certainly would have no use for Republicans, who expanded Medicare and enthusiastically embraced government intercepting Americans' communications without a warrant.
To be sure, much of the Tea Party crowd is well beyond reason, and has embraced delusional and paranoid right-wing fantasies. For these folks, Speaker Pelosi's remarks will likely be laughable.
But for some of the well-intentioned factions, the notion of driving a wedge isn't entirely far-fetched.
These guys know what's up: purge the Republican Party of the people they don't like (the RINOs) and replace them with John Birch/Ayn Rand types in the primaries. That's the difference: The Obama hating nutbars will vote for the Republican no matter what. The "reasonable faction" of the Tea Party will make their move at the primaries instead.
You think these guys will ever vote for a Democrat? No. It just means they will differ at primary time. Once that candidate is set, the target is the Democrat in the race. No wedge issues there.
Any Tea Party member who says they're independent and would consider voting for "the right Democrat" is lying to you.
You should really know better, Steve.
I agree with with that Frank Rich is wrong.The teabaggers love government when they have a boogeyman illegal immigrants,black welfare moms etc. that they could always put down.It doesnt matter that the policies that they champion have put them living in trailer parks with no health care or education.They will never vote for any progressive policies ever and we should always point out the stupidity of their rants.To them its about white privilege even though the party and philosophy they believe in treats them like a mark in a strip club."I give the women my money and attention and all I get at the end of the night is a hard on and a empty wallet."
ReplyDeleteYou're right about Benen, Zandar. Remember where he blogs, though. The Washington Monthly invented neo-liberalism 40 years ago, and heavily promoted the DLC and DLC products like welfare reform and Harold Ford.
ReplyDeleteI love the Monthly and Benen for their emphasis on reporting what government is really doing, but don't ever expect them to cheer anything to the left of Rahm.