Gibbs said flatly that the White House doesn’t believe there’s enough support in Congress to get it passed.It's the excuse Dems in the Senate need to bail...and bail they will now. Anyone else still think Rahmbo's losing his grip on his job?
Asked directly whether the President’s failure to include the public option in his proposal means he views the public option as dead, Gibbs didn’t exactly dispute this interpretation.
“There are some that are supportive of this,” Gibbs said. But he added: “There isn’t enough political support in the majority to get this through.”
“The President took the Senate bill as the base and looks forward to discussing consensus ideas on Thursday,” Gibbs added, presumably meaning that the public option is not a consensus idea.
It’s unclear why Gibbs is deciding in advance that there isn’t enough support to pass this idea. Momentum has been gathering for days. It’s also very likely that it would continue to gain steam if Obama racks up a victory at the summit and Dems press forward with plans to pass reform themselves via reconciliation.
But Gibbs’s statement seems likely, willfully or not, to slow that momentum in advance.
As I noted below, the failure to put the public option in Obama’s proposal doesn’t preclude a reconciliation vote on it later. But Gibbs is flatly declaring it a non-starter right now, before the idea has a chance to gain steam after a successful summit — a declaration that risks being taken by some in Congress as a virtual death sentence.
Not me. White House just killed the public option for good. That'll get out the vote in November for sure.
For the Republicans.
Good, the public option should be dead for now. We need to attempt to make real changes in the health insurance industry before going to that extreme. The obvious problem with the system is cost and inflation, not the service or quality of care as we are ranked amongst the best.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.patientpowernow.org/2008/06/06/united-states-health-care-ranking-who/
So if the problem is that the house isn't staying heated do you knock it down and rebuild? If you're a government spending tax payer dollars like teenage girl with a credit card you do. For someone living within their means they would look into insulation, caulking windows and in an extreme case replacing the furnace. Don't destroy the system that is the envy of the world. Make changes, small changes and evaluate. Extreme change will have the worst backlash.