This is easily the worst decision CNN has ever made. That the network probably reviewed Erickson's work before hiring him, and offered him a job anyway, suggests CNN's professional standards for what constitutes "an important voice" have all but disappeared.There really is no way to fail as a wingnut. The more of a divisive, callous, dimwitted jagoff you are, the more the Village wants you so they can prove they're not the "liberal media". The Wingers then turn around and demonize any media to the left of FOX News as too liberal anyway, and the process continues unabated.
The point here isn't that it's disappointing to see CNN hire yet another conservative voice, adding to its already-large stable of conservative voices. To be sure, it's frustrating, but it's nothing new.
The problem here is with Erickson himself.
For example, it wasn't long ago when Erickson explained his belief on why the left has a stronger online presence than the right. He attributed it to an asymmetry in free time, since conservatives "have families because we don't abort our kids, and we have jobs because we believe in capitalism."
This is the same Erickson who recently called retired Supreme Court Justice David Souter a "goat f--king child molester," referred to two sitting U.S. senators as "healthcare suicide bombers," praised protesters for "tell[ing] Nancy Pelosi and the Congress to send Obama to a death panel" (he later backpedaled on that one), and described President Obama's Nobel Prize as "an affirmative action quota."
And perhaps my personal favorite was the time, just last year, when Erickson was angry about new environmental regulations relating to dishwasher detergent. He told his readers, "At what point do the people tell the politicians to go to hell? At what point do they get off the couch, march down to their state legislator's house, pull him outside, and beat him to a bloody pulp for being an idiot?"
There was a point when major professional outlets would look at a voice like this as an "extremist," to be shut out of the mainstream of America's civil discourse. CNN, however, considers this record of radical rhetoric, and concludes it should pay him to offer on-air political commentary.
But as Benen says, the real issue is that CNN is willing to whore itself out and pick up someone as odious as Erickson just to try to give them "conservative cred" that they will never, ever have.
It's pretty pathetic.
Washington monthly article posted today...March 16, 2010
ReplyDeleteBut you clearly do all of this in advance and aren't doing it on work time...
I'm. On. Lunch.
ReplyDeleteDont take lunches at your desk, l2read imo
ReplyDeleteAnd on that note,
ReplyDeleteYou know what they say, controversy and cutting edge is what makes ratings. They just want their own little Glenn Beck.