There's only one problem. It's all a snow job.
The provision upon which they're basing this claim closes a loophole written into Medicare Part D legislation when Republicans controlled Washington. And though the change will cost the companies a small of money each year, it doesn't take effect until 2013--the figures the companies released last week reflect the total sum of the costs over several years. And as a result, House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman has welcomed executives from these companies to defend their claims on Capitol Hill.In other words, the GOP is lying to you again in order to try to make this look much worse than it really is. There's a shocker, distorting the truth around Obamacare!
Several firms have indeed claimed the reforms will cost them big bucks before the year is out. AT&T said "Included among the major provisions of the law is a change in the tax treatment of the Medicare Part D subsidy," in an SEC filing, adding that the company "intends to take a non-cash charge of approximately $1 billion in the first quarter of 2010 to reflect the impact of this change."
Verizon notified its employees by email that they may see changes to their benefits. The new law, they wrote, "may have significant implications for both retirees and employers," because of changes it makes to federal tax treatment of Medicare Part D subsidies.
The list goes on. But the reality is less striking than the enormous figures indicate.
When Part D was enacted in 2003, it contained a number of heavily criticized boondoggles for big businesses, but one such loophole offered companies subsidies to continue providing prescription drug benefits to retirees...and made those subsidies tax deductible.
Fast forward to 2010, the newly signed health care bill doesn't end the subsidies, or change the fact that those subsidies are tax free--it simply ends companies' ability to deduct them. The money that companies spend out of their own pockets on prescription drugs under Part D is still tax deductible.
In preparing for the hit, though, companies have summed up the permanent cost of this tax change and plan to write it down all at once. Now, conservatives are citing that overall cost to suggest that these companies will have to bear a billion dollar burden every year. And, of course, the kicker is that this change will not take effect under the terms of the law for three years.
Good thing the Dems have called these CEOs out.
Waxman has invited the CEOs of four companies--AT&T, Verizon, John Deere, and Caterpillar--to defend their claims before his committee when Congress returns from recess next week. We'll look closely at what they have to say.Should be an interesting day on Capitol Hill.
Hey jackass!
ReplyDeleteMight want to take a look at this!
Consider 24-year-old Nils Higdon. The self-employed percussionist and part-time teacher in Chicago pays $140 each month for health insurance. But he's healthy and so far hasn't needed it.
The law relies on Higdon and other young adults to shoulder more of the financial load in new health insurance risk pools. So under the new system, Higdon could expect to pay $300 to $500 a year more. Depending on his income, he might also qualify for tax credits.
At issue is the insurance industry's practice of charging more for older customers, who are the costliest to insure. The new law restricts how much insurers can raise premium costs based on age alone.
Insurers typically charge six or seven times as much to older customers as to younger ones in states with no restrictions. The new law limits the ratio to 3-to-1, meaning a 50-year-old could be charged only three times as much as a 20-year-old.
The rest will be shouldered by young people in the form of higher premiums.
Still feel like voting Democrat now that your premiums are going to triple in four years?
MORON!
Health Care Reform's Hidden Tax Gem
ReplyDeleteThe best surprise in the new health care reform legislation: a precedent-setting swipe at executive pay excess.
The health care reform package that President Obama signed into law last week will give many millions of Americans better access to health care. We can say that with certainty. Here's what we cannot say with certainty: The wider access that health care reform now ensures will make America a much healthier nation.
Why can't we say this? Here's why: Access to health care does not make people healthy. American middle-income people who already have health care, research has shown, have far worse health, as measured by a variety of yardsticks, than comparable middle-income people in Japan and many other nations.
If health care doesn't automatically translate into healthier societies, the obvious question becomes, then what does? Equality. People who live in more equal societies, epidemiologists have documented, live longer and healthier lives than people who live in more unequal societies.
But here's the encouraging news: The just-passed health care reform package includes provisions that will help make the United States more equal. Some of these provisions are starting to receive considerable press attention. The health care reform package overall, as New York Times analyst David Leonhardt noted last week, just may represent “the federal government’s biggest attack on economic inequality since inequality began rising more than three decades ago.”
Read More
http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010031228/...
Because its the Governments job to tell people how much they can and cannot earn.
ReplyDeleteSo much for capitalism.