Leonard Pitts of the Miami Herald puts it brilliantly.
We're in an odd moment. Having opposed the freedom movement of the 20th century, some social conservatives seek, now that that movement stands vindicated and venerated, to arrogate unto themselves its language and heroes, to remake it in their image.
Thus, you get claims that "racism" is now what Shirley Sherrod said in a speech to the NAACP. And people calling Sarah Palin the new face of feminism. And conservatives touting the likelihood that King voted Republican — as if the party in 1957 bore any resemblance to the party now.
But even by those standards, Glenn Beck's effrontery is monumental. Even by those standards, he goes too far. Beck was part of the "we" who founded the civil rights movement!? "No." Here's who "we" is.
"We" is Emmett Till, tied to a cotton gin fan in the murky waters of the Tallahatchie River. "We" is Rosa Parks telling the bus driver no. "We" is Diane Nash on a sleepless night waiting for missing Freedom Riders to check in. "We" is Charles Sherrod, husband of Shirley, gingerly testing desegregation compliance in an Albany, Ga., bus station. "We" is a sharecropper making his X on a form held by a white college student from the North. "We" is celebrities like Harry Belafonte, Marlon Brando and Pernell Roberts of "Bonanza," lending their names, their wealth and their labor to the cause of freedom.
"We" is Medgar Evers, Michael Schwerner, Jimmie Lee Jackson, James Reeb, Viola Liuzzo, Cynthia Wesley, Andrew Goodman, Denise McNair, James Chaney, Addie Mae Collins and Carole Robertson, shot, beaten and blown to death for that cause.
"We" is Lyndon Johnson, building a legislative coalition of moderate Republicans and Democrats to defeat intransigent Southern Democratic conservatives and enshrine that cause into law.
And "we" is Martin Luther King, giving voice and moral clarity to the cause — and paying for it with his life.
The we to which Glenn Beck belongs is the we that said no, the we that cried "socialism!" "communism!" "tyranny!" whenever black people and their allies cried, freedom.
You're just now reaching that conclusion? I thought it was pretty blatant from the start.
ReplyDeleteFucking asshole. But what do you expect? These douchebags like to claim ownership of the good things other people did.
Like I said, before I thought he was a dangerous demagogue but no more than any of the other dozen or so in the GOP and on the winger talk-radio right.
ReplyDeleteBut having read all his statements on this rally today, the conclusion is inescapable that he's far more vile than I would have thought capable.
Did you watch even a second of Glenn Beck's rally? How can you pass judgement otherwise? Oh yes, I forgot you're a racist, white-hating Saul Alinsky radical hack with a truly shitty blog. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s message was that ALL AMERICANS should be free. His message is not claimed exclusively by blacks. Beck was reminding America that King's dream was to be shared by all Americans and you would see that if you didn't so clearly hate white people so much.
ReplyDeleteRacist fucktard! I hope you get fired.
I must be really getting under your skin there, "Kevin".
ReplyDeletefor a second there, i thought ol' "kev's" post was intended ironically. then i realized it wasn't and got really scared. should somebody so dumb be allowed on the internet? i think not.
ReplyDeleteHey, Kev (Or is it Captain Sour Grapes, I'm not entirely sure. He usually posts under another name), you forgot to throw in "closet muslim" and "ACORN black panther" into your "ZOMG LIEBERALS ARE SO RACIST" cry.
ReplyDeleteOh hey, wanted to ask, did the Sobbing Savior bring his Vapo-Run to the rally?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteCouple points
ReplyDeleteIn using Google (a tool you should use more you tool) it looks as if 87,000 people were in attendance. You've provided a link to what 2 pics? You would figure with all the crying and complaining about "Obama Derangement Syndrome" and the "Wingnuts" and all the crying of wolf ala rascism you would have more material than that. I mean lets aim low, figure 20% of the crowd is just bat shit crazy, (I know you're leaning more towards the 80-90% range) that would mean a little over 17k if the 87k number is correct. 2 pics? I would be expecting thousands. There were cameras everywhere, I'm sure someone caught the N-word being dropped about Obama, right?
The site used is not hallowed ground in much the same way the "Ground Zero" site is not sanctified via the blood of the fallen. We as Americans have the undeniable right to gather, and so long as the right methods are used to obtain permits etc, to rally. This was all done, you can "dislike" the mans message, but to try to come down on them for the location takes just as much bigoted thinking as the people who say the Mosque shouldn't be allowed on it's proposed site.
Uh, what did Waffles do?
ReplyDeleteOh, whoops, removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYea Star, I asked a question, Z didn't respond so I'll move on past that to my point...
ReplyDeleteAnyway, there were how many people at this rally? Looks like from 75k to 100k depending on who's counting and you provided a link to 2 pics? That's all? I mean we've already established that flat out 20% of Americans are either ignorant or stupid. Surely there would be a higher concentration at this rally of bigots and wingnuts right? I mean they are all racists or homophobes that suffer from "Obama Derangement Syndrome"
How is there not more material than this? I mean even going with the given 20% I would assume you would have thousands upon thousands of pics and videos of these wingnuts. Only 2?
Now onto the whining I've heard from some progressives and blacks regarding the day and location. The site used is not hallowed ground in much the same way the "Ground Zero" site is not sanctified via the blood of the fallen. We as Americans have the undeniable right to gather, and so long as the correct methods are used to obtain permits etc, to rally. This was all done, people can "dislike" the mans message, but to try to come down on him for the location and day takes just as much bigoted thinking as the people who say the Mosque shouldn't be allowed on it's proposed site. Then again hypocrisy isn't very uncommon when dealing in politics is it?
That's right, because comparing 9/11 to the "I Have A Dream" speech is completely valid, and massive protests sprung up from black people saying that white people couldn't peacefully assemble.
ReplyDeleteNow you're just trolling. Thread over.