Legislative text put forward by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) under the banner of mandating network neutrality would instead prevent the government from requiring broadband providers to treat all Internet traffic equally.
Waxman, who has vowed that he would support the so-called 'Net Neutrality' policy proposals favored by most Democrats and progressives, has instead put forward an as-yet-unsettled legislative framework that explicitly prohibits the Federal Communications Commission from regulating broadband Internet under Title II of the Communications Act: a caveat key to implementation of what's been called the Internet's First Amendment.
Should the president sign a bill containing Waxman's language, it would effectively kill 'Net Neutrality' efforts and make key parts of a hotly contested proposal by Google and Verizon the law of the land.
While the bill [PDF link], first published by National Journal blog Tech Daily Dose, carries language that speaks of preventing ISPs from "unjustly or unreasonably" discriminating against "lawful traffic," the spirit of the rule is completely undermined by text that follows.
For today's fast-growing wireless networks, largely seen as the future dominant mode of Internet access, it makes a provision allowing for "reasonable network management," but prohibits blocking "lawful Internet websites".
The bottom line is that wireless networks would be exempt from the provisions, and with a $2 million fine for blocking sites or choking traffic, companies could make much more money by charging an extra monthly fee for "premium" wireless access. Any any traffic that comes from sites critical of the practice, say, bloggers who write about tech companies who limit access, could in turn be limited or eliminated.
Have a bad review of Verizon's newest product on your blog? Poof, nobody on a Verizon network will ever see it at anything higher than dial up speeds.
Google and Verizon have a deal? What if you're using a non-Verizon phone to access Google maps? Good luck with that...and for individual internet users, it'll be impossible to prove.
Gotta love it. Making money with robbery on the information superhighway. And it's the Dems leading the way.
So, it took Google and Verizon less than a year to flip Waxman. Days like today, it's tough to fight the impulse to grab my metaphor rifle and join the line on the Circular Firing Squad. Christ on a Triscuit.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I hear ya. Getting more and more difficult and more and more exhausting to open arguments with "but on the balance of the whole".
ReplyDeleteI couldn't even do it today. My friend started with his usual opening gambit in our political kibbutz play-fights, "What's wrong with Democrats that blah blah blah," so I shot him your article link, and a couple of pieces about the latest civil liberties outrages, and told him I really didn't fucking know. Yup, I'm going to be super compelling on the stump this cycle.
ReplyDeleteAnd yet the Republicans would be all this and worse.
ReplyDeleteThat's the really scary part.
Sure, but "Choose, and Lose Less!" ain't exactly gonna fill my GOTV van.
ReplyDeleteLOL, fuck it, I'm taking that bumper sticker's advice. Write in campaign time!
Cthulhu '10: Aren't you tired of settling for the lesser evil?
(hee, suppose a little methaphor rifle trigger time was unavoidable)
Shouldn't you follow Biden's advice and quit your whining?
ReplyDeleteLOL, whatever, kid. Read back, and see if you can ascertain whether I'll be home pouting in November, or out knocking on doors and making calls. Go on, I'll be right here.
ReplyDeleteLa da dee dum da dah...
Back? Any inkling? TL;DR? Nope, I'm Crazy Uncle Joe's guy. I'm mad as hell at our party, but have and will still pour cash, sweat and tears into the Donks. Uncle Joe wasn't talking to me, or about me. But just on the off chance he was, here's a little message that works for both of you:
My whine is better than your cheese, bitch. So stop fucking up the party with your weak shit.
(Man, I do get in a mood to feed the trolls from time to time.)
less wafflez, but there's a noticeable uptick in anonymous/new (CTBC director?) opposition to Z lately.
ReplyDeletei'm just sayin'.
signed,
a regular reader who thinks wafflez is an idiot no matter what name wafflez posts under.
Even when I don't post t-man still feels my presence. We've been over this before, pay attention.
ReplyDelete