I have reviewed this agreement that the president reached with Republican leaders, and I want to make full disclosure. You know, I make quite a bit of money now, so the position that the Republicans have urged will personally benefit me. And on its own, I wouldn't support it, because I don't think that my tax cut is the most economically efficient way to get the economy going again. But I don't want to be in the dark about the fact that I will receive the continuation of the tax rates.
However, the agreement taken as a whole is, I believe, the best bipartisan agreement we can reach to help the largest number of Americans and to maximize the chances that the economic recovery will accelerate and create more jobs, and to minimize the chances that it will slip back -- which is what has happened in other financial collapses, like what Japan faced, and something that we have to avoid in America.
Why do I say that? Because clearly, the extension of unemployment [benefits] -- which gives people a percentage of the income they were previously making -- that money will be spent, and it will bolster the economy through the next couple of years. Secondly, the conversion of the Make Work Pay tax credit, which the President passed before, which went to 95 percent of the American people, converting that into a $120 billion one year payroll tax relief act is, according to all the economic analysis, the single most effective tax cut you can do to support economic activity. This will actually create a fair number of jobs. I expect it to lower the unemployment rate and keep us going.
Thirdly, one thing I haven't seen much about in the reports, this agreement will really help America over the long term, because it continues the credits for manufacturing jobs related to energy coming into America. And I'll remind you, just in the last two years, there have been 30 high powered battery factories, either opened or presently being built in America, taking us from 2 to 20 percent of the world's share of that, and we're gonna probably be at 40 percent by 2014. This is a really important thing, bringing manufacturing back to America, because it's a huge multiplier to create new jobs.
So in my opinion, this is a good bill, and I hope that my fellow Democrats will support it. I thank the Republican leaders for agreeing to include things that were important to the president. There's never a perfect bipartisan bill in the eyes of a partisan. And we all see this differently. But I really believe this will be a significant net plus for the country. I also think that in general a lot of people are breathing a sigh of relief that there's finally been some agreement on something.
He's got a point. With unemployment benefits already expiring for people, there's a lot of urgency to get a deal done. The larger point however is that the Republicans are the ones blocking legislation, and if it wasn't for their intransigence we wouldn't be in such a time crunch right now. There are some good things in this deal. The cost for some is high, but the cost of doing nothing is also massive if we allow legislation to expire.
It's good to see Obama using Clinton as a resource, but I have to openly wonder why it took until now to get the President to do this. You've had two years.
Um, there's no question that Obama needs all the help he can get right now, but -- big picture -- isn't this an admission of defeat for his high minded agenda?
ReplyDeleteWhile so many people were obsessed with Obama's quoted "praise" of Reagan during the campaign, I thought his comparison with Clinton regarding what makes a truly transformational presidency was a not-subtle slam on both of them. Namely, that Obama was positioning himself as the "liberal-left" Reagan: a guy who could mainstream liberal ideas of domestic and foreign policy the way Reagan mainstreamed "conservative" principles. Which was, according to Obama, what Clinton failed to do when he ended up incorporating a lot of Republican ideas into his "New Democrat" policies.
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm......
ReplyDeletei wonder why our president didn't do the full court press and pull out the big dog to get an extension of unemployment benefits or the middle class tax cuts. it's almost like this $900B investment in trickledown/giveaway to the rich with crumbs for the poor is his preferred plan. and now the republicans will be his friend! grover norquist loves it! that's how bad a deal it is.
and i look forward to the press conference in early 2012 where george bush explains to us why obama HAD TO invade iran. how lame.
Actually, he went "Full court Press" WITH CLINTON during the Healthcare debate. He even had him schmooze Congress for him for votes. Memory problem there, Zander??? The Big Dawg was over the same day Buffett came to talk Economy a few months ago.
ReplyDeleteHe's doing a "Full court Press" the last month against the rethugs for his START treaty with prior SecDef, SecStates, & National Security coming to WH & endorsing it, them writing OpEds, etc., but we see what we want. He needs 67 Senate votes before the crazier Senate arrives in Jan b/c Snowflake forbids they sign any Foreign Treaties.
But the Dawg has been there at least 4 times....got Memory??
Sure he was, but Obama didn't turn the conference over to Clinton and then *leave the room* if I recall.
ReplyDelete