The ruling, which was announced on Monday, comes as a significant and unexpected setback for Mr. Emanuel, who has been a front-runner both in polls and in fundraising in the race to replace Richard M. Daley, the city’s longest serving mayor who will retire this spring.
The question of Mr. Emanuel’s residency -– and whether he had lived in Chicago long enough to appear on the city’s ballot -– had been a matter of debate since Mr. Emanuel departed the White House last fall to run for mayor.
Mr. Emanuel contended that he had always maintained a home in Chicago, the city where he was born, and that his time at the White House was a matter of national service. But Mr. Emanuel’s opponents said that Mr. Emanuel did not meet the state’s legal requirements for running for a mayor’s job, one of which included living in the city for a year before Election Day. His return to Chicago in the fall, they argued, did not come soon enough to run on a Feb. 22 ballot.
An elections board had concurred with Mr. Emanuel, as had a Cook County judge. But the Illinois Appellate Court -– in a 2 to 1 ruling -– found the opposite. With time running short and ballot arrangements already being finalized for election day, the issues seemed certain to go to the state Supreme Court.
That's putting it mildly. The decision would invalidate a number of candidates based on national service, so yeah, this one's going to the Illinois Supreme Court with shocking alacrity, especially with just 29 days to the election.
We'll see.
You know, I bet if the residency requirements were a bit stricter for Congressmen, we might end up with a lot fewer zillionaires buying up the slots. It irks me when some wealthy scion or big business washout decides to run, with almost no experience with public policy. You can point to Dems and GOP for this minor flaw in our political process.
ReplyDeleteI would love to have elections publicly financed and cut rates for media buys under a public system. If business interests want to buy ads, let them do it at the current rates, and let the little guy run on the cheap, or at least cheaper.
The State Supremes have issued a stay of the ruling.
ReplyDelete