Observation: If you want to know what Nate Silver would be like if
he decided to use his powers for “soft jazz glibertarian concern
trolling of liberals” instead of for good, then the Freakonomics franchise is about as close as you can get. It’s what happens when a Village Centrist and a Chicago school social economist team up for maximum totebagger nonsense.
Every single story there is “Here’s this liberal policy that you
probably think is a no brainer. Now here’s our cherry-picked
cost/benefit analysis that shows there’s really a massive hidden
socioeconomic price of that policy because the evil and stupid federal
government gets involved at this point here. It’s okay however, because
you’re subconsciously doing the counter-intuitive opposite of this
policy on your own personal microeconomic scale. And since so is
everybody else, that’s why the policy seems to ‘work’ at the macro
level. You’re just a delusional hypocrite, that’s all. Still, enjoy
the guilt while you ruminate on the fact that government can never, ever
work.”
And if the story isn’t about a liberal policy screwed up by the
gubment, it’s “here’s this conservative free-market policy that you
would think doesn’t work but…” and then you have to punch somebody.
Luckily, hanging around this place long enough has allowed me to
recognize the standard McBargle/Reasonoid logic these guys employ and go
“But your entire premise is self-serving bullshit that only works as
the very definition of confirmation bias. Go stick your head in a goat
orifice. Thanks.”
Makes me want to set a Thermomix on fire.
No comments:
Post a Comment