And Sen. Rand Paul embarrasses Kentucky again by going on an epic rant against workplace discrimination laws, all but declaring that there is no discrimination that laws preventing discrimination doesn't create in the first place. Paul showed up at a confirmation hearing of David Lopez and Charlotte Burrows to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and screamed at the nominees about why the commission even existed.
“Do you realize the downside of the unlimited nature of going after people with no complaint and what this is going to do to business? I mean, do you not understand what we’ve got to somehow balance that we want people to have jobs?” he asked Lopez.
“How can you show up to work with a straight face?” he demanded. “I don’t understand why you wouldn’t resign immediately and say, ‘This is abhorrent.’”
“This is so against what everything America stands for,” he blustered, “that you would go after people where there’s been absolutely no complaint, run them through the wringer and use the threat of the bully nature of your office to punish business and as a consequence punish their workers. I don’t get it.”
Paul went on to describe the agency’s investigative practices as “entrapment” and “a crime.”
If Rand Paul's argument sounds a lot like the same logic MRAs and Gamergate nimrods use against women and minorities, it's because the arguments are the same. The presence of people trying to get equal treatment is "destroying" everything.
Lopez responded, “I disagree that what the committee is doing is entrapment.”
He went on to explain, “Most individuals who get discriminated against in the hiring process do not know that they’ve been discriminated against because employers usually do not say that they’ve been discriminated against.”
“We’re going after mythology then,” said Paul.
“Realize that there’s a penalty” for this, he went on, saying that there are millions of unemployed people in this country who would be happy to take whatever jobs they could get.
To recap, because discrimination is often subtle, covert, and pervasive, instead of overt, it's "mythology". I'm sure that'll make a whole lot of people feel better that workplace discrimination is all in your pretty little heads.
But we're supposed to take this idiot seriously as our next President.
Sure.
I know of an attorney who would take the case:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.orlytaitzesq.com
I couldn't think of a more entertaining case title: Boehner/Taitz vs Obama. Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, John Oliver, Carson Daily, Jimmy Fallon, Craig Kilbourne, the SNL writing staff, et al, would all be thrilled!