If you're wondering what's so awful about Israel's "retaliatory strike" of building more settlements,
as Emily L. Hauser explains, it's
where the settlements are that matters. As with any real estate issue, it's location, location, location. (emphasis mine:)
Yet if we’re to be brutally frank,
bluster and threats are entirely unnecessary. Israel doesn’t need to
convince the world of its position or to take extreme measures to make
sure that Palestine’s nascent statehood dies in the cradle. All Israel
needs to do is stay its decades-long course and keep sending out
bulldozers.
Witness
the report
that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s morning-after response to the
statehood vote is 3000 new housing units in the West Bank and East
Jerusalem,
as well as expedited work in the E-1 “envelope,” a
development project intended to geographically join Jerusalem to the
settlement of Maaleh Adumim and thus cut the West Bank in half. And thus
destroy territorial contiguity for any Palestinian state. And thus
drive a final nail in the coffin of the notion of two-state peace.
Though impressive in scope, there is, in fact, nothing new in these plans—indeed, even though Netanyahu committed to President Obama upon taking office that he would not
build in E-1, that piece of it can’t be considered a breach with the
past either. After all, Israel is forever promising the U.S. one thing
and then doing quite another, in particular with regard to the
settlements.
So yes, the reaction of the Israelis to the Palestinian recognition vote is very much an act of war. Building a settlement corridor that would cut the West Bank in two is pretty despicable. And yet, most Americans will shrug and say "Well how could that be bad? Why are those awful Arab terrorists complaining about
that?"
Now you know.