Sunday, January 18, 2009

And Lo, The Village Idiots Spake...

If it's Sunday, it must be time for a backhanded hit piece on Obama from Politico, and this week they don't disappoint.
With Barack Obama's approval ratings in the 70s and his visage plastered on every shop window and Metro card in Washington, it's hard to remember that 58 million Americans voted for the other guy.

Even President Bush — who presumably counts himself among that group — said last week that Obama's inauguration is "a moment of hope and pride."

That's not exactly how Michelle Malkin describes it.

"Jan. 20 has turned into a schlock inauguration, (where) every last moocher has come to cash in on Obama," says the conservative blogger and pundit. "There are some of us who want to bang our heads against the wall."

While most Republicans now in office are saying all the right things about Tuesday's proceedings — roll tape on "peaceful transfer of power" and "historic moment for the country" sound bites — some conservatives can't quite get themselves in the "We Are One" mood.

Not even for a day.

On his radio show last week, Rush Limbaugh railed against "people on our side of the aisle who have caved and who say, 'Well, I hope he succeeds. We have to give him a chance.'"

"Why?" Limbaugh demanded. "They didn't give Bush a chance in 2000. Before he was inaugurated, the search-and-destroy mission had begun. I'm not talking about search-and-destroy, but I've been listening to Barack Obama for a year and a half. I know what his politics are. I know what his plans are, as he has stated them. I don't want them to succeed."
Let's get things straight. The Village has one job now: to make George W. Bush's presidency look better than Barack Obama's.

Honestly, why is El Rushbo and Malkinvania hating Obama news enough for a Sunday Politico column? The millions of people out there this week braving the cold to get a glimpse of Obama at this historic juncture are just not representative of America, apparently. Malkinvania and El Rushbo are, however.

The country being truly grateful for getting rid of Bush just doesn't compute to these guys. Obama has to be taken down. Your "liberal media" is going after Obama hardcore now, and he's still not even President yet.

The Bush Legacy

Matt Yglesias sums up the last eight years (emphasis me.)
Thinking back to George W. Bush’s farewell address it’s striking that the best thing the man can say about his record in office is that only once during his term in office were 3,000 people killed by foreign terrorists. And it’s really striking that other people in the conservative movement seem to take this “accomplishment” very seriously.
There's a reason why conservatism is dead right now. It's on the slab and the Republicans along with it are not going to be able to stop Obama. Why? BooMan explains (again, emphasis me).
It's mostly raw numbers. The Democrats have the votes to do almost anything they want. But there two other factors that are new and poorly understood. The first is Obama himself. The Democrats haven't seen a president like this with this much congressional support since LBJ, and we all remember the Great Society was the result. The most important factor though is that the Republicans have suffered a total collapse on all fronts. They have lost elections, partisan support, the ability to raise money, the ability to redraw districts in their favor, their credibility on the budget, taxes, national security, and family values...in essence, they no longer have a coherent ideology to rally around.

The Republicans also lack a national leader. They don't even have a Barry Goldwater. Therefore, Republican politicians are rudderless and will increasingly find the safest course is to look out for themselves and their own interests. And the only way for a Republican to be relevant in this Congress, and to make tangible achievements that they can bring back to the voters in their states or districts, is to work with the Democrats on their committees as they draft new laws. They will have to work with the Democrats on energy, financial regulation, agriculture, transportation spending, non-proliferation, and education, and then they will have to vote for that legislation.

This is especially true in the Senate, where the Republicans are more inclined to work in this way and, in any case, they still have some relevance. But the idea that Minority Leader McConnell will be able to filibuster Democratic legislation is absurd. He will never kill off bills that his members have had a say in crafting. And this is why Obama's refusal to make hard ideological stands and demands is not a signal that he is going to move to the center. He's not moving to the center, he's co-opting the center and making it part of his coalition. If you don't believe, just watch. Obama is going to be the most powerful president since LBJ, and he will leave a similar legacy of progressive legislation.

That's a nice thought. We'll see if it holds true. There's a reason why Bush's approval rating is 22%. He's the worst President of anything, ever. The man that follows will hopefully be one of the best.

He has to be. If he's not, America is in serious trouble.

Sue For Peace

Hamas and Israel have agreed to a temporary cease-fire in Gaza. Of course the meaning of "cease-fire" is "Israel still occupies all of Gaza and will resume attacking at any time."
Palestinian militants agreed Sunday to a one-week cease-fire against Israel, Hamas spokesman Ayman Taha said.

The Hamas announcement came hours after Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced a unilateral cease-fire in the country's assault on Hamas in Gaza.

"We in the Palestinian resistance movements announce a cease-fire in the Gaza Strip," Moussa Abu Marzouk, a senior Hamas official in Syria, said on Syrian TV. "And we demand that Israeli forces withdraw in one week and that they open all the border crossings to permit the entry of humanitarian aid and basic goods for our people in Gaza."

The agreement covers all Palestinian armed factions, not only Hamas, said CNN Jerusalem correspondent Paula Hancocks.
Israel has no intention of withdrawing from Gaza, of course. The inevitable result is another round of hostilities by both sides after a week or so.

Village Stupidity

Via BooMan, today's front page story in the Washington Post explores the newest D.C. party scene accessory: Black people.
Except for the first time, the face of ultimate power is African American. With a black first family in the White House and a diverse group of appointees and Cabinet nominees, the all-white dinner party feels all wrong. Certain hosts are suddenly grappling with a new reality: They need some black friends. Overnight, black politicians, lawyers and journalists are hot properties, receiving engraved invitations from people they never got invitations from before.

Blacks have gone from barely being on the list to being in charge of the list.

"Everyone knows that his campaign was about inclusion," Jarrett said. "We would expect that spirit of inclusion to also reflect on Washington's social scene."

A swift shift is underway in this exclusive set of those who deal with the highest level of federal government. That's a signal of wholesale change, said A. Scott Bolden, managing partner of law firm Reed Smith's Washington office and a longtime politico in a city where professionals work side by side by day, but socialize separately at night.

"You see those 'What's In and Out' columns every year?" he asked with a laugh. "With Obama and the first family in town, arguably being black is 'in.' "

This? This right here is why I despise the Village. Washington, D.C. is one of the most heavily African-American cities in the country, and only now with a black President is somebody noticing after 230 years something might be wrong with an all-white dinner party in a mostly-black city.

Jesus wept. "Well, up until now the D.C. cocktail circuit was a bunch of racists. Now it's okay!"

Saturday, January 17, 2009

StupidiNews, Weekend Edition

Friday, January 16, 2009

Totally Unplugged

Several news outlets reporting Circuit City is liquidating all assets: 35,000 more jobs lost as the company goes under.

It will not be the last major retailer to fold over the next several months.

[UPDATE] The deal for a buyer fell through. No takers on its assets, today was the deadline for a buyer and that deadline will pass without one, according to the story. Practical upshot, end of the company and 35k jobs down the drain.

[UPDATE 2] Although this was expected, the psychological impact of this is devastating. Bear Stearns didn't have a real impact on your Dad or brother or girlfriend. But everyone's shopped at Circuit City before. Anyone can go to the mall and see the big holes in the storefronts. Anyone can see Main Street is in serious trouble. And everyone is wondering "is my company next?"

There's going to be a lot more retail liquidations over the next few months, and the resulting empty storefronts and commercial real estate crash are going to really test the boundaries of a working depression.

I honestly don't see anything at this point that's going to prevent a 20-25% real unemployment rate by next year. A lot of people are going to be out of work and will not be able to get jobs, period.

Pardon Our Dust

So when does Bush drop his bombshell pardons? He has roughly 100 hours left before he's not President anymore. BooMan is betting late today in grand Bush Administration Friday Night News Dump style, since Monday is a bank holiday for MLK, others say Monday would make sense as Obama's inauguration would act as a perfect news dump.

After Eric Holder's statements yesterday at his hearing and the GOP offering no more than token resistance, the incoming AG is making a lot of Bushies nervous as a nitro delivery guy in a trampoline factory.
President-elect Barack Obama's nominee for attorney general said unequivocally Thursday that waterboarding is torture, and he vowed to initiate an extensive and immediate "damage assessment" to fix fundamental problems within the Justice Department that he said were caused by the Bush administration.

Eric Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee during a marathon hearing that the incoming Obama administration is making major course corrections on the interrogations of terror suspects and many other issues that will represent a significant break from the current policies and programs.

Early on he was asked whether waterboarding, a technique that makes a prisoner believe he is in danger of drowning, constitutes torture and is illegal.

"If you look at the history of the use of that technique, " Holder replied, "we prosecuted our own soldiers for using it in Vietnam. ... Waterboarding is torture."
And while I absolutely applaud Holder's statements, I'm more convinced than ever that the pressure on Bush to issue blanket pardons some time in the next couple of days is going to be immense. He will be convinced there's enough risk of investigation and prosecution by Holder that he has to do it now. Bush really, really wants America to like him and to remember him fondly, but the fact that an overwhelming majority of Americans are glad as hell to see him go only means he has much less to lose if he does it.

I'd put it at 80% he does it. It would be higher, except it's a tacit admission of a mistake, which Bush has always been loathe to do. Still...a last-second pardon like this would explain why Holder's getting a free pass.

We'll know very soon.

Cutting The TARP Free

The Senate vote to release the second half of the TARP fund went along party lines, with Democrats securing a 52-42 vote in favor of supplying Obama with $350 billion.
Obama praised lawmakers for their quick response to the crisis and thanked senators for helping him score an important victory in the first test of his administration's ability to forge consensus. The Senate voted 52 to 42 to defeat a resolution that would have blocked the second installment of the $700 billion financial rescue program, guaranteeing that the money will flow to the Treasury soon after Obama takes office Tuesday.

The House may vote on a similar measure next week, but its defeat in the Senate makes that effort largely symbolic.

Obama acknowledged that it "wasn't an easy vote" for many senators "because of the frustration so many of us share" over how the Bush administration managed the first half of the rescue fund, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

"Restoring the economy requires that we maintain the flow of credit to families and businesses," Obama said in a statement. "So I'm gratified that a majority of the U.S. Senate, both Democrats and Republicans, voted today to give me the authority to implement the rest of the financial rescue plan in a new and responsible way."

With news of a $825 billion financial stimulus package in the House ready to go, Obama may be able to sign a number of bills and executive orders into law within the first few weeks of his term and hit the ground running.

But will it be enough? I have strong doubts. The best Obama will be able to do is soften the blow for some Americans over the next 18-24 months. He may indeed choose to start with the effective nationalization of Citigroup and Bank of America and other large financials. With the TARP money freed up now, Treasury can move on this option and can move quickly. The fact is Citigroup is on its last legs, and is planning to split the company into a good bank and a bad holding company: a prime target for nationalization. BoA has snapped up another $20 billion from TARP 2 already. More banks will follow.

And six weeks from now when the TARP funds are gone and banks are still in trouble...then what?

StupidiNews!

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Zandar's Thought Of The Day

Bush Derangement Syndrome is the sarcastic belief that liberals are so insane that they see George W. Bush as being ultimately responsible for even the smallest evil in the universe. Wingnuts made this term up and use it as often as possible as it allows them to more comfortably dismiss legitimate criticism of Bush and avoid logically discussing his problems. Just ignore the argument the liberal makes, then yell "You just hate Bush!" and bam, you win.

Needing a new strawman argument for the forseeable future, Obama Derangement Syndrome is apparently the sarcastic belief that liberals are so insane that they see Barack Obama as being ultimately responsible for even the smallest good in the universe. Wingnuts love this as it allows them to more comfortably dismiss legitimate praise of Obama and avoid logically discussing his merits. Just ignore the argument the liberal makes, then yell "You just love Obama!" and bam, you win.

To wingnuts, this is called "evolution."

Stimulus And Response

Me, ten days ago:
Why the hell is Obama going at this from a position of weakness? What makes him think the GOP has any respect for his position or his agenda when they just stopped publicly calling him all but a secret Muslim terrorist only two months ago? They will not stop until they get everything they want: another Bush trillion dollar plus tax cut for the rich and especially for corporations. If they don't get it, they will destroy the entire spending package and the economy along with it. If they do get it, they will destroy the economy and finish the most massive transfer of wealth in history and eliminate the middle class.

Obama's already playing like he's lost, and he's not even President yet.
LA Times, today: (h/t Hullabaloo)
President-elect Barack Obama's hopes of scoring significant bipartisan support for his stimulus package are fading, as the debate over the nearly $800-billion plan morphs into a classic Washington impasse: two rival parties in irreconcilable conflict.

Obama had hoped to induce Republicans to back his plan by putting forward a series of business tax cuts. But GOP support is peeling off as the party crafts alternative ideas that rely even more heavily on tax reductions.
Thank you folks, I'll be here all week, try the veal!

In all honesty folks, is anyone surprised? Give the GOP an inch, they take the whole playing field, the stadium, the parking lot, the concession stands, the bathrooms, the overflow parking, the streetlights, the little parking shuttle tram and the sports bar across the street. When you try to walk down the center of the highway, you get hit by the eighteen-wheeler. The only purpose Obama serves for the GOP is to be somebody to blame for this economy. They will do everything they can to destroy him on this. The more Obama gives in, the more the GOP is able to control the narrative (and the Village will help them every step of the way.)

In the end, Obama has two choices: act like he and the Democrats won an overwhelming majority in 2008, or cede control of the country to the obstructionist GOP minority.

Here endeth the lesson, Mr. Obama.

The Purpose Of The Village

The Village has decided its purpose over the next four years, and that purpose as John Cole has discovered is to dump as much of the blame of everything that has gone wrong in the last sixteen years on the shoulders of one Barack Hussein Obama.
I really need to stop watching cable news, but I had the idiot box on CNN last night and got to watch this spectacle:
JOHN KING, CNN CHIEF NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT: No.

But the reason, as you just heard Dana report, that Harry Reid, the Senate leader, wanted to schedule it sooner, rather than later, is, they believe, the longer it waits, as David just said, the more water the ship could take on when it comes to the TARP funding.

And—and David makes a key point, Anderson, because, politically, every day we get closer to that inauguration, and then, on Tuesday, this becomes Barack Obama’s economy. It’s Barack Obama’s bailout money. And it’s Barack Obama who is paying the price for the anxiety. He has a lot of goodwill. He has high public approval.

Even many people who didn’t vote for him want him to succeed. But guess what? They’re still mad about the economy, still don’t think this bailout is a good idea, don’t know where the money is going, and don’t think it’s getting to them on Main Street USA or to the bank on the corner of their street.

And that is now becoming increasingly—and is about to become completely—Barack Obama’s political problem, not John McCain’s, not George W. Bush’s, not the Republican Party’s.

Got it? Obama OWNS the economy the day he becomes President. His fault. That growth during the Clinton years- that was due to Reagan. The bad stuff from 2000 on, that was the Clinton economy, until, of course, the 20th, when it becomes Obama’s.

The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled off was to convince the world he didn't exist. The second greatest trick was to convince the world that Barack Obama is already responsible for George Bush's failed legacy (except for all the problems that Clinton and Carter created.)

It's impossible for a Republican President to be wrong, bad, or even responsible in any way to our "liberal" media. At the same time, it's impossible for a Democratic President to ever do anything other than to reach various levels of failure in a futile effort to be absolved of the Great Original Sin of Democrats...being a Dirty F'cking Hippie.

You see, a Republican can ignore every miscue of Hoover, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and Poppy Bush. But a Democrat will never be able to escape the shadow of that most hated and most infamous miscreant of the 20th Century, that foul miasma known as FDR. Obama is no different. The transfer of wealth the GOP engineered over the last eight years will pale in comparison to the transfer of blame over the next four.

And this is why I hate the Village so very, very much. Well, this and those Subway $5 footlong commercials.

Defending Geithner

If the GOP wanted Obama's new Treasury Secretary gone, they could take him down in a heartbeat. But the fact of the matter is the GOP loves the guy.

Was he cheating on his taxes or just sloppy with his finances? Lawmakers vetting the nomination of Timothy F. Geithner to serve as Treasury secretary say they may never be sure. But leading Republicans nonetheless joined Democrats in leaping to his defense yesterday, calling Geithner's tax gaffes small potatoes compared with his qualifications for saving the global economy.

Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (Utah), the second-most senior Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, which is charged with reviewing Geithner's nomination, called him "brilliant" and "honest" and said that, despite his tax errors, "I don't think we can get a better person for this position. . . . He has the kind of background that should be very helpful to us at this time."

Sen. Robert F. Bennett (R-Utah), a close associate of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), said: "If I was a traffic officer, I'd say he may have exceeded the speed limit, but he wasn't weaving out of lanes, he wasn't drunk and he wasn't endangering anybody. He may have some explaining to do, but in the end, I think he's going to be just fine."

As a matter of fact, everything you need to know about Tim Geithner in general is that his situation has caused Hugh Hewitt to defend Obama on the grounds that "A president deserves his cabinet choices because he has won the election and been charged with executing the laws".

If Hugh is making actual logical sense in a column, there is something fundamentally wrong in the universe. The reason the GOP want Geithner around is because they honestly believe he's Hank Paulson with better press.

You Think I'm STILL Depressing?

I'm a veritable font of puppies and rainbows and crap compared to this guy.
Societe Generale said on Thursday that the United States' economy looks likely to enter a depression and China's could implode.

In a highly bearish note, veteran cross asset strategist Albert Edwards said investors should now cut equity exposure after a turn-of-the-year rally and prepare for a rout.

He predicted that the S&P 500 index of U.S. stocks could be set for a fall of around 40 percent from recent levels.

Edwards also raised the danger of a global trade war with China.

"While economic data in developed economies increasingly reflects depression rather than a deep recession, the real surprise in 2009 may lie elsewhere," Edwards wrote.

"It is becoming clear that the Chinese economy is imploding and this raises the possibility of regime change. To prevent this, the authorities would likely devalue the yuan. A subsequent trade war could see a re-run of the Great Depression."

Edwards has long been one of the most bearish analysts in London, first with Dresdner Kleinwort and then with SocGen.

If Edwards is right, China's economic collapse will knock us square into the ten-year stag-deflation nightmare. Without the ability to purchase our debt, China devaluing the yuan would almost immediately cause the US to go belly up and take the global economy with it. China has become the world's third largest economy now, but that has all but fallen apart in 2009.
The central government has believed that as the demand for exports softened recently due to the global recession, the country's new middle class would continue to help GDP growth through consumption.

The plan has fallen apart like a cheap watch. According to The Wall Street Journal, "China's exports in December fell 2.8% from a year earlier to $111.16 billion, while imports in the month fell 21.3% to $72.18 billion."

What was unimaginable a year ago has now happened. China has entered a recession and it may end up being deeper than the one in the U.S. It is not clear that the government can mount and manage a plan to create about 10 million new jobs. This will be an even more difficult task if exports continue to fall sharply. China does not have a service industry which is anywhere close to being as large a part of the GDP as it is in the U.S.

The illusion developed over the last decade was that China had become an independent power with a population which could make and consume goods at levels which have never been seen before. During the last two quarters, it has become clear that the the opposite is true. China's economy may be the most dependent large economy on earth.

If GDP in the U.S., E.U., and Japan contract at 5% this year, China's economy is very likely to shrink faster. It will be faced with a sharp drop in what it makes and exports. More importantly, large numbers of Chinese are leaving the huge new industrial cities and going back to rural regions where they can at least find work growing their own food. What is more than a trickle now could become a flood. Those who have gone back to non-industrialized sections of the country will not be net consumers at all.

With a short-lived and dwindling middle class, China no longer has the economic core to continue the "miracle." China has just become another big country in trouble.

In other words, China's raging dragon of an economy has burned itself out. It's going to have to take (fittingly) draconic steps in order to right the sinking ship, and the fact of the matter is China is going to call in the trillions of debt we owe it in order to help it out.

And when we can't pay up, we lose. As Roubini will tell you, our choices at this point are a nasty 24-month or more "U-shaped" recession, or a decade-long "L-shaped" depression, Japan-style. The jury's still out on which one we're facing. Keep in mind the 2-year recession is in fact the best case scenario at this point: we still have another 12 months to go of truly bad economic conditions, millions of lost jobs, thousands of businesses going under and probably a few hundred more big companies.

For a few weeks since late November equity markets ignored the onslaught of much worse than expected macro news (and all the new were really worse than awful) and had a nice 25% bear market sucker’s rally. But the drumbeat of terrible – and worse than expected - macro news and earnings news and financial news has finally taken a toll on the delusional market belief that the worst was over for financial markets and for equity markets and that the US and global economy would recover in the second half of 2009. So equity prices have already reversed more than half of their most recent bear market rally as the lousy macro news have finally shocked in the last week the wishful thinkers.

Indeed, the retail sales figures published today confirmed a shopped-out, saving-less and debt-burdened US consumer is now faltering as job losses, income losses, fall in home wealth, fall in equity wealth, high and rising debt and debt servicing ratios and a severe credit crunch take a severe toll on the ability of consumers to spend. And reduction in spending and deleveraging of the US consumer will take years to rebuild the savings rate of a household sector now hit by a severe shock to its net worth (as equity and home values fall while debts have been rising) and shocked in its ability to generate income as job losses mount and the unemployment rate surges.

In other words, we're in no shape to help out anyone. Like a group of massive dinosaurs who have wandered into the tar pits at the same time, there's not going to be anyone on the outside big enough to pull us out of the muck.

The only option left is to sink.

Dear America:

"You poor Obamabots have no friggin clue about the problems we've left you. None. You'll have some idea of course when you get blamed for it and we're back in power in 2012, cause I know where all the bodies are buried and I'll be damned if I'm going to let you sweep anything under the rug. You guys are completely screwed. Four years from now, I'll be heralded as a genius AGAIN. Good luck, you miserable assholes. You'll need it."

--Karl Rove, WSJ
Related Posts with Thumbnails