What's the thought process here, Virginia State GOP Sen. Steve Martin?
Martin, the former chairman of the Senate Education and Health Committee, wrote a lengthy post about his opinions on women's bodies on his Facebook wall last week in response to a critical Valentine's Day card he received from reproductive rights advocates.
"I don't expect to be in the room or will I do anything to prevent you from obtaining a contraceptive," Martin wrote. "However, once a child does exist in your womb, I'm not going to assume a right to kill it just because the child's host (some refer to them as mothers) doesn't want it." Martin then changed his post on Monday afternoon to refer to the woman as the "bearer of the child" instead of the "host."
Wait what, pregnant women are "hosts" now? I mean sure, if you consider the kid a parasite or you're from the planet Zergon Prime, pregnant females are "hosts".
Actually, as Ed Kilgore points out, the alien thing does explain the Tea Party, doesn't it.
But this is the standard RTL position, and why most antichoicers oppose “rape and incest” exceptions other than as a matter of tactical flexibility. Once a zygote exists, it’s a person and a baby and has rights equal to (if not superior to, because of its “innocent” nature) the mother, or the “bearer of the child,” or the “host,” or however you want to put it. No interest of the woman in terminating the pregnancy (or even preventing it, if that happens after fertilization) other than preservation of her own life can possibly trump that “right to life.”
And they legislate to that effect, and will keep doing so until it is the law of the entire country, hence the term "anti-choicers" being 100% applicable: you have no choice but to have the baby. The "host" is just that, for the term of pregnancy only the baby matters. The woman becomes merely a vessel and effectively loses rights over her reproductive system from the instant of conception.
Or possible conception, depending on the law. In other words, if a woman has sex or if it is forced upon her unwillingly (again depending on the law) she loses her rights to her own body because she may from that point on be a "host".
Seems pretty alien to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment