Any hope that China and Russia would move to allow the UN a more robust role in preventing another Houla Massacre was quickly dashed this week as
both countries vowed to continue to support keeping the al-Assad regime in power.
China and Russia on Wednesday reiterated their stance against
military intervention in Syria despite soaring international
condemnation in the wake of a massacre that killed more than 100,
including children.
"One cannot take
decisions on military operations in Syria by being guided by only
emotions," Russian first deputy foreign minister, Andrei Denisov, was
quoted as saying by the nation's state-run Itar-Tass news agency.
Denisov was responding to
a statement by French President Francois Hollande, who accused Beijing
and Moscow of blocking efforts to impose tough measures against the
Syrian regime.
China urged the warring sides in Syria to resume diplomatic dialogue and support a peace plan by international envoy Kofi Annan.
"China opposes military
intervention and does not support forced regime change," said Liu
Weimin, a foreign ministry spokesman. "The fundamental route to
resolving the Syrian issue is still for all sides to fully support
Annan's mediation efforts and push all the relevant parties to carry out
diplomatic dialogue."
China and Russia have
vetoed U.N. Security Council resolutions condemning President Bashar
al-Assad's regime for attacks on protesters.
"We believe that
considering any new measures to affect the situation would be premature
for the Security Council," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady
Gatilov told Russia's Interfax news agency.
One has to wonder at this point what al-Assad would have to do in order for new measures to become necessary, but there is room enough for caution here. Syria would not be Libya and the dynamics of intervention would be significantly different in a number of key ways, most notably with Syria's proximity to Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq and Turkey...and oh yeah, Israel along the Golan Heights.
Any action in Syria would put Western allies in a serious bind, not to mention Syria is a majority Sunni Muslim nation (75% or so) with pretty much zero Shi'ites, and that's not going to go over well with Iraq or Saudi Arabia (unless both nations decide to look the other way if we go after al-Asaad's Alawite sect to put the Sunnis in power, which would piss off all the Shi'ites.)
The thing is Syria actually has an Army and Air Force, even a Navy (and it's not old Soviet era surplus, either.) There's a reason why China and Russia are so quick to block intervention, al-Assad has been a good customer. It wouldn't be a cakewalk, and who knows what would happen with the long borders with Iraq and Turkey.
The great Muddle-Through continues, I guess.