Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Epic Activist Governor Fail

In Vermont, today's contestant is GOP Gov. Jim Douglas!
Vermont has become the fourth state to legalize gay marriage — and the first to do so with a legislature’s vote.

The Legislature voted Tuesday to override Gov. Jim Douglas’ veto of a bill allowing gays and lesbians to marry. The vote was 23-5 to override in the state Senate and 100-49 to override in the House. Under Vermont law, two-thirds of each chamber had to vote for override.
"Hahaha, take that! I veto your legislation! I stand alone as final arbiter of who can be married in this state! ...Wait, what? OVERRIDE? THEY CAN DO THAT?"

EPIC FAIL.

Zandar's Thought Of The Day

Irony isn't just dead, it's been tossed into the furnace and used to power drivel like this in today's USA TODAY:
Obama's word play

The administration has created a lexicon that masks reality through the gauzy world of euphemism. To the world, it’s just words.
This opener courtesy of Jonah Goldberg, the same Jonah Goldberg who wrote a book called Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning, arguably one of the most pointlessly vapid screeds ever to sully the world of publishing, in which Goldberg tries to prove every Democrat since Woodrow Wilson was in fact a terrible, freedom-hating fascist -- basically by A) declaring any Democrat who ever attempted to use government to accomplish anything must in fact be a terrible, freedom-hating fascist, and B) pretty much ignoring every nasty deed the Republican Party committed over the last 80 years.

This, then, is the man who accuses the President of being "morally tone-deaf".

Ahh irony, how I'll miss you. And does anybody at USA TODAY proofread this crap before it goes out?

Only Takes One To Get Lucky

Want to know where you can find some interesting people in the Bluegrass State? Here in Kentucky they hang out at places like the annual Knob Creek Gun Shoot.
Ever since the election of President Barack Obama, gun store owners have reported massive increases in sales of firearms and ammunition. Attendees and sellers at Knob Creek can confirm that. Ron Hansen, a retiree from Michigan, grumbles that the ammunition supply at the show has “declined dramatically” since the displays of only a year ago. Myron Moore, a seller making a brisk trade in pistols and clips, explains that sales spiked right after the election and have slipped only a little because people worry this will be their last chance to stock up. “I’m selling everything Obama’s trying to ban,” he laughs.

Other attendees were uncomfortable revealing their first or last names. As massive as the event is — the Knob Creek Gun Range estimated that around 15,000 people passed through the gates–it does not keep tabs on who comes in. This is a safe haven, where guns can change hands without a lot of paperwork, and where ammunition is relatively cheap, though the prices have skyrocketed in the last few years. A purchase of an old Mauser rifle that would take some red tape-cutting in a gun shop is hassle-free at the gun range.

This is a place where vendors can sell T-shirts that read “The Fourth Reich: Obama-Biden 2012,” and “Hitler Gave Great Speeches Too..” and, most succinctly, “Fuck Obama.” It’s somewhere for people with hard-to-explain interests in World War II memorabilia can pick up items from Wehrmacht uniforms (”I’m putting the stuff together to make me a German officer,” says a man buying a Wehrmacht officer’s cap), Adolf Hitler mousepads (”Next time… no more Mr. Nice Guy”), and coffee mugs with Nazi commanders’ faces etched on them.

This leads to a certain skepticism of the media. Mark Stevens, whose Nazi merchandise is not moving very quickly on Saturday, declines to talk about it. “Any publicity from the media is bad publicity,” he explained.

One man asks a vendor if she has any “Impeach Obama” bumper stickers. Initially, he’s open to talking about his problems with the president. “There’s a black man in the White House,” he said. “What else do you need to know?” He suggests that journalism isn’t much of a career and tells me to look for something else to do. But 15 minutes later, he spots me in the range’s gun shop and asks me to cross his name out of my notebook. He grabs the book, grabs a pen, and scratches dark black ink onto the paper. “I don’t know who you are,” he said. “I don’t know if you work for the Southern Poverty Law Center. I don’t know if you work for the government.”

As bad as these folks are, being a racist asshole is being a racist asshole. I've dealt with them all my life, and I don't really care. Some people are just going to be jagoffs with incredibly ignorant opinions and that's not a sign of somebody who is crazy or violent. Some people will never accept a black man in the White House, or a Democrat in the White House for that matter.

But not everybody who owns a gun is a lunatic. Far from it. There are millions of responsible gun owners in America who will never, ever in their lives draw their weapon in anger or with intent to kill another human being. I know and respect many people who I know own firearms. I figure they're good people to be friends with.

But it's folks like the following I don't respect, and who give gun owners a bad, bad name.

The thousands of attendees who only showed up to shoot could avoid some of the more extreme political elements at the event, even if the extremists were hard to miss. The Barack Obama “Birthers,” who believe that the president cannot prove that he is an American citizen, were present in a table located close to the main range, near the NRA’s sign-up booth. It’s a location that allows them to pass out fliers for RiseUpAmerica.com, with a 10-point explanation of how “Barry Soetoro” could be removed from the presidency, to anyone walking through to the rest of the event. “He’s an illegal alien!” shouts Theresa Padgett, one of their volunteers. “We have an illegal alien running the country.”

“We need your help,” says Carl Swensson, the group organizer who has put together a “citizen jury” to indict the president. “They can’t go across the country and arrest everybody, although they do have pretty good facilities in the FEMA camps,” he says, referring to a conspiracy theory about the government building holding centers for dissidents. In the early afternoon Swensson and Padgett were joined by Orly Taitz, an attorney who has filed multiple lawsuits challenging the president’s citizenship, and they got organizers to read an announcement about their effort over the loudspeakers. By the end of the day they have collected at least 400 signatures, and dozens more from retired military members who wanted to sign on to one of Taitz’s lawsuits. Still, some people who signed onto the Obama citizenship petitions are grim about the chances of surviving this presidency with something as quick and easy as a legal disqualification.

Alan, a registered nurse from Illinois, asks whether last week’s massacre in Binghamton, N.Y. was a set-up. “How many government shooters or special ops teams,” he asks, “how many guys were in there killing people just so they could make gun owners look bad?” He’s not convinced by media reports about the massacre, especially because the shooter killed himself. “These people always kill themselves. They’re either mind-controlled or they’re set up.”

Alan says that he gets the real story on the threat to gun-owners from Mark Koernke, the militia leader who hangs around the show until the end, wearing Swiss camouflage and carrying copies of “How to Start and Train a Militia Unit.” He thinks that the revolution against the government in Washington and “the corporation of the United States” will begin this year, kicked off by some Lexington and Concord stand-off. He gives one attendee some advice about how to take care of his Mauser.

“When this is used in the next war,” Koernke says, “it’ll be part of the victory weapons that liberated America. ‘Yeah, my granddaddy used this in 2011! It was a hell of a fight!’”

Yeah. These guys? These guys are the problem. These are the guys who are just waiting for an excuse to "liberate" the country, and these are the guys that make me want to learn how to operate and maintain a firearm. I'm not worried about the government shooting me. I'm worried about these assholes shooting me.

The Tim McVeigh/Eric Rudolph/David Koresh militia movement didn't die during the Bush years. They found the internet instead. Now they all have a common enemy, a mixed-race Democratic president with the middle name Hussein, and they will be damned if he's allowed to ruin their country, by God.

Just takes one of these paranoid assholes to get lucky.

Sixty-Six Percent Is Not Good Enough

As Atrios reminds us, President Obama's 66% approval rating in the latest CBS poll means Good News For Republicans, because that's how the Village defines it.

The 12-step Village Logic goes like this:
  1. Obama has a 66% approval rating.
  2. This is meaningless.
  3. What has meaning is that Democrats really like him, Republicans do not.
  4. This means Obama is not bi-partisan like he said he would be.
  5. This gap between Dems and Republicans is more than 50 points.
  6. This gap is higher than Bush's gap at 2.5 months.
  7. Ergo, Obama is the most divisive and politically partisan President in modern history.
  8. Meaning, Obama is Worse Than Bush.
  9. Now, This is excellent news for Republicans, because...
  10. His 66% approval rating is meaningless, only the Republican opinion of Obama matters.
  11. Thus marginalizing all the Democrats and Independents and the overwhelming majority who like him,
  12. And Q.E.D., he's the Worst President Ever.
Thanks for playing.

Breaking Point

Now that Arlen Specter has pretty much killed EFCA, it didn't take long before other supporters mysteriously started turning on the President and the legislation, not wanting to upset business interests in their home states.

In what is, perhaps, the most devastating blow yet to the fate of the Employee Free Choice Act, Sen. Blanche Lincoln said on Monday that she will oppose the union-backed legislation.

The Arkansas Democrat, whose home state includes WalMart, one of the major business groups fighting EFCA, announced her decision during a meeting of the Little Rock Political Animals Club.

"I cannot support that bill," Lincoln said, according to Arkansas Business. "Cannot support that bill in its current form. Cannot support and will not support moving it forward in its current form."

Labor forces can ill-afford to lose any Democrats in this legislative battle, given the partisan lines of the EFCA vote in 2007. Already, Sen. Arlen Specter, the lone Senate Republican to vote for cloture on the Employee Free Choice Act back then, has indicated he will oppose cloture if the bill were to be brought up in this Congress.

Lincoln, long considered a crucial Democratic vote on EFCA, was the focus of intense political pressure. Union groups were courting her support while the business community had made her a primary target for defection. Indeed, WalMart hired her former chief of staff for the precise purpose of lobbying on EFCA. Lincoln is up for reelection in 2010.

A red state Dem up for reelection, from the home of Wal-Mart.

Yeah, nobody could have predicted, etc. yadda yadda.

Heck Of A Price Tag

The IMF's latest numbers on toxic asset writedowns for banks show a price tag of $4 trillion bucks: $3.1 trillion for US banks, another $900 million for Europe and Asia.
Toxic debts racked up by banks and insurers could spiral to $4 trillion, new forecasts from the International Monetary Fund are set to suggest, British daily The Times reported on its website without citing sources.

The IMF said in January that it expected the deterioration in U.S.-originated assets to reach $2.2 trillion by the end of next year.

But it is understood to be looking at raising that to $3.1 trillion in its next assessment of the global economy, due to be published on April 21, the newspaper reported.

In addition, it is likely to boost that total by $900 billion for toxic assets originated in Europe and Asia, the Times said.

Back in August, the IMF's number was half that for the US, $1.4 trillion in writedowns. This time last year, the IMF was talking about $600 billion or so, maybe $950 billion, tops in bank writedowns. Now it's more than three times that.

What a difference a year makes, huh?

Man's Inhumanity To Man

The International Committee of the Red Cross has released its 2007 report on the conditions and treatment of Gitmo detainees, and the results are stunning.
Medical officers who oversaw interrogations of terrorism suspects in CIA secret prisons committed gross violations of medical ethics and in some cases essentially participated in torture, the International Committee of the Red Cross concluded in a confidential report that labeled the CIA program "inhuman."

Health personnel offered supervision and even assistance as suspected al-Qaeda operatives were beaten, deprived of food, exposed to temperature extremes and subjected to waterboarding, the relief agency said in the 2007 report, a copy of which was posted on a magazine Web site yesterday. The report quoted one medical official as telling a detainee: "I look after your body only because we need you for information."

New details about alleged CIA interrogation practices were contained in the 43-page volume written by ICRC officials who were given unprecedented access to the CIA's "high-value detainees" in late 2006. While excerpts of the report were leaked previously, the entire document was made public for the first time by author Mark Danner, a journalism professor, on the Web site of the New York Review of Books.

ad_icon

The confidential report sheds additional light on the CIA's handling of the detainees, who were held in secret overseas prisons for up to four years and subjected to what the agency describes as "enhanced interrogation techniques." In addition to widely reported methods such as waterboarding, the report alleges that several of the detainees were forced to stand for days in painful positions with their arms shackled overhead. One prisoner reported being shackled in this manner for "two to three months, seven days of prolonged stress standing followed by two days of being able to sit or lie down."

In addition to the coercive methods -- which the ICRC said "amounted to torture" and a violation of U.S. and international treaty obligations -- the report said detainees were routinely threatened with further violence against themselves and their families. Nine of the 14 prisoners said they were threatened with "electric shocks, infection with HIV, sodomy of the detainee and . . . being brought close to death," it said.

The war crimes were committed in your name, America. They were authorized by then President Bush and Vice-President Cheney, and other Bush cabinet officials knew what was going on. They knew and did not stop these acts of brutal torture that served no purpose in protecting the country. We know Republicans are willing to do anything to prevent America from finding out the full truth behind the authorization of these acts.

This was done in our name. History will not be kind to us. Perhaps if you believe in fate, or karma, or a great national reckoning, maybe you view our current economic situation as a not so gentle reminder that what goes around, comes around.

I'm certainly willing to entertain that as a theory about right now.

StupidiNews!

Monday, April 6, 2009

The Sum Of All Fears On Pakistan

When one of America's top counter-insurgency analysts says that Pakistan could collapse in six months to an Islamic coup, it's best to pay attention.
Strengthening Pakistan’s weak civilian institutions, updating political parties rooted in feudal loyalties and recasting a military fixated on yesterday’s enemy, and stuck in the traditions of conventional warfare, are generational challenges. But Pakistan may not have the luxury of the long term to meet them.

Some analysts here and in Washington are already putting forward apocalyptic timetables for the country. “We are running out of time to help Pakistan change its present course toward increasing economic and political instability, and even ultimate failure,” said a recent report by a task force of the Atlantic Council that was led by former Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts. The report, released in February, gave the Pakistani government 6 to 12 months before things went from bad to dangerous.

A specialist in guerrilla warfare, David Kilcullen, who advised Gen. David H. Petraeus when General Petraeus was the American commander in Iraq, offered a more dire assessment. Pakistan could be facing internal collapse within six months, he said.

General Petraeus, in Congressional testimony last week, called the insurgency one that could “take down” the country, which is home to Qaeda militants and has nuclear arms.

Even before the insurgency has been fully engaged, however, many Pakistanis have concluded that reaching an accommodation with the militants is preferable to fighting them. Some, including mid-ranking soldiers, choose to see the militants not as the enemy, but as fellow Muslims who are deserving of greater sympathy than are the American aims.
Folks, a collapse of the Pakistani government is pretty much worst-case scenario. Pakistan has nuclear weapons. India will not stand by and allow the Pakistani nukes to come under extremist control. They will move with decisive military action. Should that happen, the US will have to act quickly to prevent a nuclear exchange, and doing so will almost certainly destabilize the rest of the Middle East, not to mention draw China and Russia into the fray.

From there, we get a Tom Clancy novel where the bad guys have a very good chance of winning. Millions of lives could be at stake in a very grim scenario.

Pray Obama's up to it. After all, sending repeated drone attacks into Pakistan isn't helping stabilize the government too much.

Global No-Confidence Vote: Failing The Test

It's looking more and more like Timmy sold us up the river, folks. You know those bank stress tests everyone keeps talking about as the key for saving the financial system from itself? Turns out there's ample evidence to believe that the tests are at best, a complete ruse that will deliver no useful information about the true state of the banks, and at worst they are completely rigged.

Nobody could have predicted, etc...
The bank stress tests currently underway are “a complete sham,” says William Black, a former senior bank regulator and S&L prosecutor, and currently an Associate Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri - Kansas City. “It’s a Potemkin model. Built to fool people.” Like many others, Black believes the “worst case scenario” used in the stress test don’t go far enough.

He detailed these and related concerns in a recent interview with Naked Capitalism. But Black, who was counsel to the Federal Home Loan Bank Board during the S&L Crisis, says the program's failings go way beyond such technical issues. “There is no real purpose [of the stress test] other than to fool us. To make us chumps,” Black says. Noting policymakers have long stated the problem is a lack of confidence, Black says Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is now essentially saying: “’If we lie and they believe us, all will be well.’ It’s Orwellian."

The former regulator is extremely critical of Geithner, calling him a “failed regulator” now “adding to failed policy” by not allowing “banks that really need desperately to be closed” to fail. (On Saturday, Geithner said on Face the Nation, if banks need "exceptional assistance" in the future "then we'll make sure that assistance comes with conditions," including potentially changing management and the board, but did not say they'd be shut down.)

Black says the stress test must also be viewed in the context of Geithner’s toxic debt plan, which he calls “an enormous taxpayer subsidy for people who caused the problem.” The fact bank stocks have been rising since Geithner unveiled his plan is “bad news for taxpayers,” he says. “It’s the subsidy of all history."

Any scenario for fixing the banks is 100% dependent on the stress tests objectively and accurately determining which banks are solvent and which banks are effectively insolvent. If the tests are rigged as Black says, then there's no way to save the banks or the financial system, in effect, the system will be doomed to collapse.

The stress tests being a way to magically pass all the banks as "A-OK" when they are insolvent is basically the absolute worst case scenario, where banks will be allowed to operate as zombies ad infinitum on the taxpayer dime, funded by Helicopter Ben's Magic Printing Press.

The resulting hyper-inflation as the taxpayer has to continually fund trillions in bad loans and toxic crap basically wipes out the US economy and the world with it. Game, set, match.

If William Black is right, the Obama administration will end up doing more damage to the economy than Bush did, and that kind of admission from myself is downright terrifying.

Do read that Naked Capitalism link. The details of what a true stress test should be, and what Geithner is proposing, should make you ill. I know it does me.

I also asked him about the fact that bank examiners examine banks (duh) and would not have much (any?) experience in the capital markets operations or sophisticated products that the big investment bank, now banks, participated in. Goldman and Morgan Stanley ought to be subject to these exams; Citi, JP Morgan, and Bank of America have large capital markets operations. These firms are where the biggest risks and exposures lie. Do the examiners what to look for in a even the low-risk operations, like repo desks, much the less derivatives and proprietary trading books? He agreed (as presented below) that it was a near certainty that this was beyond their skill level.

Now this begs the question: why has the Treasury Secretary set in motion an obviously bogus process? It suggests the result is pre-ordained.
As AG would say, "The fix is in, folks." And this time, the fix has fixed us but good. A hundred regulators versus the entire financial system when Geithner and Obama have every single reason to lie to us about the results, to pass the banks off as "improving", and hope the Toxic Asset Three-Card Monte game is enough to fool all of the people, all of the time.

Bottom line is there's nothing Timmy can do to save the economy that won't wipe out the standard of living of your average American, but this way Treasury gets to claim due diligence while all hell breaks loose. It's either face the truth and assure a collapse now, or hyper-inflation and collapse later. As a politician, what would you do? Tell the truth?

The lifeboats on the S.S. Titanic are being quietly filled while we're busy below decks listening to the captain's recorded announcements that everything is fine. It's not. Obama can't save us. All he can do is try to control the damage from the collision. Telling us the truth would cause mass panic. Lying to us until the banksters and the bigwigs can get the lifeboats launched is the way to go.
But even the designation of "sick but not ready to be hospitalized" carries with it risk to the Administration. If the banks get sicker than anticipated, how can they explain it? They can't say, "oh, things got worse than we contemplated". The whole point of a stress test is to anticipate worst case scenarios. And it is pretty certain a fair number of the big banks will be on such large-scale life support by year end that it will be hard to make a case not to put them in receivership.
And by the time things get that bad, receivership may not be a viable option anymore...not without Helicopter Ben's Magic Printing Press going at full speed. This is a brutal scenario, one where Obama has determined he has no choice but to prepare America for a collision with an iceberg.

First quarter 2009 was bad. You will refer to them as "the good times" before long.

Be prepared.

Zandar's Thought Of The Day

Why is it that the same people that rightfully remind us that policework is a dangerous job and that cops can get killed...
A madman shot five officers, killing three, in Pittsburgh. These men did protect and serve. The gunman was taken into custody, too late to save three of the officers.
... are the same ones who criticize the police for putting the safety of their officers first?
Wrote Steyn: “If you ever have to call 911, it may be worth requesting that kind of service rather than the world’s most heavily armed and lavished equipped yellow-tape installers.”

That’s cold, but it appears to be fitting. I wonder if anyone in New York state will dare hold the Binghamton Police accountable for their inaction in the face of danger.

If the police cannot serve and protect, let’s get rid of them.

So which is it, Don Surber? Should officers be concerned about their safety when they are facing people armed with guns in a job where they can get killed themselves or get others killed, or are they negligent for allowing people to die when trying to safely operate in a clearly dangerous environment?

It's a difficult job and way the hell too easy to criticize in hindsight when the bullets aren't flying, man. It's even worse when you use that to score political points.

The Nuclear Option

Over at the Daily Beast, Scott Horton reveals that Senate Republicans appear to be playing hardball on the issue of torture and Justice Department nominees (emphasis mine):
Senate Republicans are now privately threatening to derail the confirmation of key Obama administration nominees for top legal positions by linking the votes to suppressing critical torture memos from the Bush era. A reliable Justice Department source advises me that Senate Republicans are planning to “go nuclear” over the nominations of Dawn Johnsen as chief of the Office of Legal Counsel in the Department of Justice and Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh as State Department legal counsel if the torture documents are made public. The source says these threats are the principal reason for the Obama administration’s abrupt pullback last week from a commitment to release some of the documents. A Republican Senate source confirms the strategy. It now appears that Republicans are seeking an Obama commitment to safeguard the Bush administration’s darkest secrets in exchange for letting these nominations go forward.
Bottom line, if the Obama administration releases those John Yoo torture memos, Republicans will scuttle the nominations of the people who are most likely to prosecute the offenses these memos entail.

It very much is blackmail if that is the case, and Obama should immediately release the memos and bury the GOP if they try to block Dawn Johnsen and Harold Koh. I say pull the trigger and make the bastards pay. Scuttle the Republicans. If they block the rest of Obama's appointments, then they'll never shake the Party of No label.

If Obama caves on this one, then we've lost ourselves as a country.

Congratulations Are In Order

Because Shelly Bachmann has finally crossed over into Godwin's Law territory with her stupidity, thus earning her my eternal scorn and a tag for future derisive snark.
The launching point of Bachmann's remarks was the widely popular and bipartisan Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act, which would expand national community service programs from 75,000 positions to 250,000.

"It's under the guise of -- quote -- volunteerism. But it's not volunteers at all. It's paying people to do work on behalf of government," said the Minnesota Republican. "I believe that there is a very strong chance that we will see that young people will be put into mandatory service. And the real concerns is that there are provisions for what I would call re-education camps for young people, where young people have to go and get trained in a philosophy that the government puts forward and then they have to go to work in some of these politically correct forums."

The Obama White House did not immediately return request for reaction. The Kennedy Serve America Act passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 275 to 149 and the Senate, by a vote of 79 to 19.

Needless to say, new tag for the Distinguished Nutbar From Minnesota: Bachmanniac.

The woman's persecution complex could power Minneapoils for days on end.

[UPDATE] And pray she doesn't see this article, either. Actually, I hope she does. The freak-out should be impressive.

Some Real High School Garbage Going On

Greg Sargent picks up on the GOP eating its own over the weekend, particularly stabbing current House Minority Leader John Boehner in the back and pumping up the stock of current GOP Whip Eric Cantor.
You know there’s serious disarray afoot among a party’s Congressional leaders when the principals and their staffs start leaking damaging info about each other, and that now seems to be happening among House GOP leaders.

Check out this nugget from Ben Pershing’s piece on increasing tensions among House Republicans. It appears that someone is trying to pin the blame for the House GOP’s politically-disastrous, numbers-free budget on John Boehner:

Privately, Cantor and the lawmaker tasked with writing the GOP budget, Rep. Paul D. Ryan, had urged the party to hold off going public until it could produce a finished product. Both men wanted a more detailed proposal with dollar figures that would make it a more defensible document. Boehner and House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence disagreed, hoping to counter as quickly as possible Democrats’ charge that Republicans are “the Party of No.” The result was a botched rollout and bad press.

And someone wants to shift the blame for the botched budget rollout away from Eric Cantor.

Boehner survived one attempt on his job after the election, but it's looking like Cantor's crew has declared "Game on!" and aren't waiting for 2010. Then again, if the contest if between the GOP as the Party of No and the GOP as the Party of Stupid Ideas, does it matter who wins?

Leading The Witness, Your Honor

Steve Benen has more on that zany North Korean missile poll from Rasmussen that just seems to be full of complete insanity.
The key question was worded, "If North Korea launches a long-range missile, should the United States take military action to eliminate North Korea's ability to launch missiles?" In response, according to Rasmussen, 57% said, "Yes."

I can only assume those 57% haven't thought this through. If the U.S. were to "eliminate" North Korea's ability to launch missiles through military action, that would instigate a rather dramatic regional conflict, involving South Korea, Japan, China, and Russia. A majority of Americans really prepared to jump into this over a launch that, by some measures, was a failure?

In the meantime, Newt Gingrich believes the Obama administration should launch a pre-emptive strike against North Korea, and use "lasers" to take out the country's missile capabilities. Gingrich added that Obama has a "dangerous ... fantasy foreign policy."

Yes, the guy who wants to shoot frickin' lasers at North Korea believes the president's foreign policy is the stuff of fantasy. Got it.

And people wonder why nobody takes Republicans (or Rasmussen) seriously.
Related Posts with Thumbnails