John McCain's campaign could be panicking or politicking with its claim that sexism lies beneath any questions about Sarah Palin's past.Course, then he turns into his regular Obama hating douchebag self in the second half of the article, but it's my blog, I don't have to quote that part.They say they're not panicked — that the Alaska governor's spot on the GOP ticket is secure — so that leaves room for just one conclusion for now: McCain's political team is playing the gender card to appeal to women, and bashing the media to solidify support among conservatives.
Hours before Palin's high-stakes address to the nation, McCain was trying to inoculate his untested and embattled running mate against criticism.
"This is part of a very clever strategy to lead the Democrats into a trap that will end up with them dumping on Gov. Palin and paying a heavy price," said GOP consultant Rich Galen.
The chorus began at dawn Wednesday when senior adviser Steve Schmidt released a statement declaring that the campaign would no longer answer questions about its background check of Palin, a little-known governor whose every blemish is being paraded before Americans.
"The vetting controversy," Schmidt said, acknowledging that McCain has trouble on his hands, "is a faux media scandal designed to destroy the first female Republican nominee for the vice president of the United States who has never been a part of the old boys' network that has come to dominate the news establishment of this country."
It was a two-fer: Schmidt both tried to rally undecided female voters behind McCain's historic pick and prodded conservative Republicans to do what they do every election cycle — blame the media.
And so, Schmidt suggested, the campaign won't explain why Palin waited until last week to tell the McCain team that her unmarried 17-year-old daughter is five months pregnant.
Or why Palin didn't submit to a face-to-face interview with the head of McCain's search team until a few days before her announcement.
Or why she's accused of improperly ordering the firing of the former public safety commissioner.
Or why she supported the infamous "Bridge to Nowhere" and other pork-barrel projects before telling the nation on Saturday that she was against them.
"This nonsense," Schmidt said, "is over."
Not likely.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Teh WAR!1!!one! Continues
Wow. The AP's Ron Fournier has been pretty hard on Obama lately, but it's almost nice to see the guy smack McSame and Palin around for once with his "analysis". (h/t Mei-Chan The Wonder Pandafish(tm) in StupidiComments)
StupidiTags(tm):
McSame,
Obama,
Sarah Palin,
Village Stupidity
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
"And so, Schmidt suggested, the campaign won't explain why Palin waited until last week to tell the McCain team that her unmarried 17-year-old daughter is five months pregnant.
Or why Palin didn't submit to a face-to-face interview with the head of McCain's search team until a few days before her announcement."
Uh, wouldn't those be because she wasn't a serious consideration before last week? :)
I think he's barking up the wrong tree with bringing these particular accusations into play. That part isn't about Palin, but it IS about McSame. :)
Uh, wouldn't those be because she wasn't a serious consideration before last week? :)
She's not a "serious consideration" now, apparently. That's most of the problem.
The advance copy of Palin's speech shows she's all about attacks on Barack Obama. There's nothing on the issues there. Since there's nothing on the issues she can actually say with a straight face, change the subject.
Post a Comment