Friday, August 14, 2009

The Kroog Versus Death Panels

Paul Krugman determines that maybe the Republicans don't really care to do anything other than obstruct and destroy. Like myself, he had figured that out from Election Day.
Some of us were skeptical. A couple of months after Mr. Obama gave that speech, I warned that his vision of a “different kind of politics” was a vain hope, that any Democrat who made it to the White House would face “an unending procession of wild charges and fake scandals, dutifully given credence by major media organizations that somehow can’t bring themselves to declare the accusations unequivocally false.”

So, how’s it going?

Sure enough, President Obama is now facing the same kind of opposition that President Bill Clinton had to deal with: an enraged right that denies the legitimacy of his presidency, that eagerly seizes on every wild rumor manufactured by the right-wing media complex.

This opposition cannot be appeased. Some pundits claim that Mr. Obama has polarized the country by following too liberal an agenda. But the truth is that the attacks on the president have no relationship to anything he is actually doing or proposing.
Agreed. No matter what President Obama was proposing, he would still be under constant attack by the Republican Pretty Hate Machine, and often for the same things Republicans praised Bush for. Anything he does is inherently evil.

Senator Chuck Grassley, Republican of Iowa, is one of these supposed moderates. I’m not sure where his centrist reputation comes from — he did, after all, compare critics of the Bush tax cuts to Hitler. But in any case, his role in the health care debate has been flat-out despicable.

Last week, Mr. Grassley claimed that his colleague Ted Kennedy’s brain tumor wouldn’t have been treated properly in other countries because they prefer to “spend money on people who can contribute more to the economy.” This week, he told an audience that “you have every right to fear,” that we “should not have a government-run plan to decide when to pull the plug on grandma.”

Again, that’s what a supposedly centrist Republican, a member of the Gang of Six trying to devise a bipartisan health plan, sounds like.

So much, then, for Mr. Obama’s dream of moving beyond divisive politics. The truth is that the factors that made politics so ugly in the Clinton years — the paranoia of a significant minority of Americans and the cynical willingness of leading Republicans to cater to that paranoia — are as strong as ever. In fact, the situation may be even worse than it was in the 1990s because the collapse of the Bush administration has left the G.O.P. with no real leaders other than Rush Limbaugh.
The Kroog is hot today as he notes The GOP Plan in all its dark glory. The goal is to "break Obama" remember? So what can you do when you have one party wanting to pass legislation and a vocal, obstructive minority that refuses to allow anything to happen?

So far, at least, the Obama administration’s response to the outpouring of hate on the right has had a deer-in-the-headlights quality. It’s as if officials still can’t wrap their minds around the fact that things like this can happen to people who aren’t named Clinton, as if they keep expecting the nonsense to just go away.

What, then, should Mr. Obama do? It would certainly help if he gave clearer and more concise explanations of his health care plan. To be fair, he’s gotten much better at that over the past couple of weeks.

What’s still missing, however, is a sense of passion and outrage — passion for the goal of ensuring that every American gets the health care he or she needs, outrage at the lies and fear-mongering that are being used to block that goal.

So can Mr. Obama, who can be so eloquent when delivering a message of uplift, rise to the challenge of unreasoning, unappeasable opposition? Only time will tell.
Not only are all those excellent suggestions, I would add "Telling the Republicans to shut the hell up" and getting on with passing whatever legislation needs to be passed. There's no good faith negotiation here. There's no bipartisan comity. There's only the Party of No. If they don't want to be part of the solution, then exclude them from the process.

Stop being nice to them. Kick them to the curb and get on with the country's business.

5 comments:

Mike J. said...

I think the problem is that too many Democrats want no part of health care reform, climate legislation, or anything else that smacks of liberal policies. I wonder whether this bending over backwards to accommodate the GOP (especially in the Senate--what's with this "it takes 60 votes to get anything done in the Senate" mentality that has set in?) is simply a way to have the legislation fail without leaving any Democratic fingerprints on it. After all, the same happened to Clinton's health care reforms. If Clinton had half the level of support of his party that Bush enjoyed, we would have had universal health insurance by now. If this fails again, it will be the Democrats' fault first and foremost.

Zandar said...

True. But in end, the alternative is the Republicans.

Servius said...

What you guys can't figure out is that most of the country are not Democrats and abhor what the Dems are trying to do.

Government healthcare may win large majorities among Dem voters but not among the rest of us.

http://ow.ly/k4tw

There is an alternative to taking over healthcare. http://ow.ly/k4vg Some of the things in it we've been fighting for for a while but the Dems have always obstructed any real reform.

Zandar said...

The Democrats have always obstructed any real reform?

That's laughable.

I've got news for you too...most of the country abhors the Republicans and voted them out of office last year.

Servius said...

Yeah, that's why the Republicans have been leading the Generic Congressional Ballot since June.
http://ow.ly/k4KI

Republicans lost credibility for things like the Foley affair. Specifically the cover up of it.

Combined with Bush behaving more like a Democrat on medicare, education, steel tariffs, bank bailouts, and immigration plus the economic downturn which we've already agreed goes deeper than any one president all that depressed conservative turnout.

Next election, with Obama throwing Keynesian gasoline on the fire, the Dems are going to have a come-uppance. Even Nate Silver is saying Dems may lose as many as 50 seats in the House.

What we need is for a party to throw out the Keynesianism of the past and the socialism of Obama and forge ahead with policies that acknowledge the laws of the market.

Personally, I don't care if it has a D or and R.

Related Posts with Thumbnails