Ingraham argued that "a lot of people are saying" that the Obama administration is more "impassioned about" Fox News than "other threats to the United States, whether economic threats or real threats, Islamic jihadists."Yeah. Get that, people? Obama is tougher on FOX News than he is terrorists. I don't know who's laughing harder at that idiocy, Obama or the terrorists. Have you ever seen anyone cut themselves playing the victim card before? You have now.Ingraham didn't say who these "people" are who are "saying" this, but apparently, there are "a lot" of them. (When right-wing media personalities appear on mainstream outlets, they do this quite a bit -- they don't want to say crazy things on their own behalf, so they attribute nonsensical ideas to vague and undefined groups of "a lot of people," who do not appear to exist in reality.)
Even Stephanopoulos seemed incredulous about the observation, saying, "You don't believe that they've been softer on Islamic jihadists than they have on Fox News. Come on." Ingraham, dropping the pretense of passing along the thoughts of "a lot of people," insisted she hasn't seen White House officials "talk about other real threats in the same coordinated and sophisticated way as they're going after" Fox News.
John Podesta responded that Ingraham might be right "when the drones start flying over Fox News."
Remember, Obama is the scariest fascist to ever walk the Earth because he thinks FOX might not be fair and balanced. Not even the Village is ready to make that analogy, and that alone should tell you everything you need to know.
And yet, Laura Ingraham will be right back on the Sunday shows again after this because they think you'll want to listen to her opinion.
1 comment:
wtf was she even doing on abc in the first place ???
the folks asked 'who is the loony' after that segment.
i had to explain the fox thing to them and they had one question: are they all like that on fox ???
'there are more insane ones'.
'really?'
'i can't do it justice'.
Post a Comment