The hostage-takers might not prefer to kill the kid, but there's definitely some upside to killing the kid, as it strengthens them in future negotiations. Conversely, the people on the other side of the phone don't want the kid to die, but also don't want a situation in which hostage-taking is encouraged. Generally, you try and resolve that by killing or capturing the hostage-takers, but that's not really an option here, with the closest analogue being a kamikaze primary challenge against Blanche Lincoln, which would come too late to affect health-care reform anyway.This is actually incorrect.
Ezra still assumes that both sides are negotiating. To have negotiations, both sides must operate on good faith. This isn't any more of a negotiation that it was with the Republicans. What this is here is a plan to demand so much from the bill that the progressives are the ones that kill the bill and get blamed for it. It's patently obvious if you take into account 3 things:
- The Senate corporate masters do not want any bill to pass at all.
- The GOP and the ConservaDems do not want to take the fall for killing the bill.
- Obama has to pass a bill or else he will be a one-term President.
The point is to bring down Obama in such a way that kills the Dems for decades and finishes off the Donks for good.
No comments:
Post a Comment