Saturday, August 10, 2013

Meanwhile, In The Echo Chamber Of Rand Paul's Mind...

Rand Paul's interview with Bloomberg Businessweek's Joshua Green is something to behold, folks.  And by "something to behold" I mean "another in a long line of idiotic positions that immediately disqualify him from the White House."

What is your plan to refashion the GOP to draw more minority and younger voters?

All voters, but particularly young people, and often young people who are African American or Hispanic, I think they have a sense of justice, and they sometimes mistrust government with achieving justice. So one of the big issues that I’ve fought here is getting rid of the provision called indefinite detention. This is the idea that an American citizen could be accused of a crime, held indefinitely without charge, and actually sent from America to Guant√°namo Bay and kept forever.

I think there is something in that message of justice and a right to a trial by jury and a right to a lawyer that resonate beyond the traditional Republican Party and will help us to grow the Republican Party with the youth. Defending the Internet’s privacy, these are all things that broaden the appeal of Republicans.

Sure, because when I think about how minorities are mistreated by the American justice system, I first think of indefinite detention in Gitmo.  That's going to resonate more than stop and frisk, Trayvon Martin, gun murders, the Voting Rights Act being destroyed, etc.  Awesome.

A recent article in the New Republic said your budget would eviscerate the departments of Energy, State, Commerce, EPA, FDA, Education, and many others. Would Americans support that?

My budget is similar to the Penny Plan, which cuts 1 percent a year for five or six years and balances the budget. Many Americans who have suffered during a recession have had to cut their spending 1 percent, and they didn’t like doing it, but they were able to do it to get their family’s finances back in order. I see no reason why government can’t cut 1 percent of its spending.

And when Americans figure out all those pennies are coming from only Energy, the EPA, the FDA, Education, and not the Pentagon, they might protest.

But the end takes the cake:

Who would your ideal Fed chairman be?
Hayek would be good, but he’s deceased.

Nondead Fed chairman.
Friedman would probably be pretty good, too, and he’s not an Austrian, but he would be better than what we have.

Dead, too.
Yeah. Let’s just go with dead, because then you probably really wouldn’t have much of a functioning Federal Reserve.

Can we stop pretending that Rand Paul is anything other than a massive embarrassment my state is stuck with until 2017?


RepubAnon said...

I particularly liked the following: "I think there is something in that message of justice and a right to a trial by jury and a right to a lawyer that resonate beyond the traditional Republican Party"

The traditional Republican Party would be George W Bush and Dick Cheney, and all the Republicans who vehemently opposed giving anyone accused of terrorism a "trial by jury" and a right to a lawyer:

Senators say Tsarnaev should be declared 'enemy combatant'
WASHINGTON -- Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.), said Saturday in a joint statement that alleged Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev should be denied a defense attorney and declared an “enemy combatant.”

aconservativeteacher said...

Suggesting that the government cut 1% of funding, close Gitmo, and adopt Austrian economics does not equal "massive embarrassment". These are all sound policies that in the past other Presidents have adopted. You and others can happily debate the merits of these policies (which I notice you don't do- typical liberal just ignores policy debates and results and instead goes right to name calling). But I see what you're trying to do- by calling him and his policies names, you dismiss him and dehumanize him without debating him or analyzing the merits of his policies. That sort of tactic is massively embarrassing for a blogger to do.

Zandar said...

So, does hiring a racist shock jock radio host on your campaign staff count as embarrassing?

aconservativeteacher said...

This is the old bait-and-switch tactic, right? Have a conversation about comments that he made, and then when that conversation is joined switch it to another conversation entirely? Eventually you'll find an argument that you can 'win' and then gloat even though you lost a thousand more. Maybe next time respond to the point I made instead of engaging in non-sequitur attacks.

Zandar said...

You're not "having a conversation" with anyone, you're trolling my comments section. You don't get to do that.

Related Posts with Thumbnails