Reminder for folks out there: big social media companies like Facebook and Twitter pretty much completely own any data you enter into the system, and they can do whatever they want with it.
The latest way that Facebook has been peeking into its users’ personal lives may be the most surprising yet: Facebook researches have published a scientific paper that reveals the company has been conducting psychological experiments on its users to manipulate their emotions.
The experiments sought to prove the phenomenon of “emotional contagion” — as in, whether you’ll be more happy if those in your Facebook news feed are. They took place over the week of January 11th-18th, 2012, and targeted 689,003 English-speaking Facebook users.
The study, which was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. was successful. It found that, indeed, manipulating the algorithm to show more “positive” posts in your news feed will actually inspire you to write more “positive” posts yourself. So, for example, if you see a lot of people happy about their jobs or excited to be seeing the concert of their favorite band, then you’re more likely to post that you are happy about something in your life, too.
While that little fact in itself may be interesting, there’s one disturbing aspect of the study: None of the people involved in the experiment were explicitly told that they would be a part of it.
Facebook does have terms of service — ones that every Facebook user has agreed to — thatspecify users’ data may be used “for internal operations, including troubleshooting, data analysis, testing, research and service improvement.” The researchers of this psychology experiment argue that their experiments fall under these terms of use because “no text was seen by the researchers.” Rather, a computer program scanned for words that were considered either “positive” or “negative.”
“As such,” the researchers write, “it was consistent with Facebook’s Data Use Policy, to which all users agree prior to creating an account on Facebook, constituting informed consent for this research.”
Something to remember when you're out there in the big world of social media. Your data belongs to these companies 100% as far as they're concerned, and there's very few regulations for protecting your privacy from them, if any.
Posts
2 comments:
So I guess the only real choice we have is who gets to claim our data?
I'm beginning to think that my avoidance of Facebook was clairvoyance rather than distaste for their "social" model.
Stay opted out, my friends.
This kind of misbehaviour is exactly why I broke with the Greenwaldians: they are shitting their pants over lurid fantasies about capabilities that the NSA might get around to enacting some day, while failing to give any shits over actual misbehaviour being perpetrated every blessed day by Facebook and Google and Yahoo and - yes - our old friends at the CIA who evidently can infiltrate the Congressional file system and blackmail sitting Senators without raising a peep from the hysterical ninnie set over at the Daily Kos. Some people have their priorities all screwed up.
Post a Comment