Remember Judd Gregg, former GOP senator and governor from New Hampshire? He has a new column at The Hill predicting how a Republican Senate in 2014 would go, and it's hysterically funny fan fiction.
The election of a Republican Senate will not be a signal from the hinterlands that people want more of the same. It will be a directive to stop acting like peevish politicians and start governing for the good of the nation.
If this instruction is ignored, it will almost certainly mean that the next time around — the 2016 elections — the Republican Congress will face stiff punishment from voters.
Thus, there will be a considerable motivation for a Republican Congress next year to make things happen.
If voters were interested in making things happen why would they elect more Republicans, when Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell swore they top priority of Senate Republicans was making Obama a one-term President by doing nothing? Go home Judd, you're drunk.
But since this will still be a divided government and the GOP may hold only the barest of majorities in the Senate, this new Congress is not going to be able to address Main Street issues unless it does so in concert with the president.
So the next question is this: What incentive is there for the president to come into the room? He has not done this in a meaningful way in the first six years of his term, and indeed doing so seems to be anathema to his personal views of governance.
Yes, at every step of the way, President Obama has "refused" to work with Republican senators, including the fact he nominated Judd Gregg as Commerce Secretary as one of his first acts, only to have Gregg tell the President to go screw himself a week later.
Every time President Obama has offered to work with Republicans, they have told him to screw off. Now they are suing him. You're right, Mr Gregg, why should President Obama come to the table? Look in the mirror and you'll have the answer as to why not.
1 comment:
Nephew is heartbroken by the Argentine defeat: he adores Messi.
Post a Comment