Last Call

With the Republican party increasingly going the route of The Last Bastion Of White Privilege, the Civil Rights Act of 1965 has outlived its political usefulness to a party that has turned its back on African-American and Latino voters.  In no red state is this battle being fought more fiercely than in Texas, second only to California in population and electoral college votes, and the Lone Star State is suing to get out of the Civil Rights Act's Section V "pre-clearance" laws that allow the Department of Justice to block the state's new voter identification suppression law.  Texas (and national) Republicans want the Civil Rights Act of 1965 gutted if not thrown out completely, and they're depending on the Supreme Court's judicial activist conservative bloc to do it.

It's a race to see which set of numbers wins, Texas's growing and increasingly blue Latino population, or the five conservatives on the Supreme Court.  We get a preview this week with an entire week's worth of oral arguments before the DC Circuit Court.

While it passed with bipartisan support more than 45 years ago, a shift in political preferences along racial lines has turned the landmark piece of civil rights era legislation into a highly charged political issue.

In the 1960s, Democrats held a monopoly of voters in the Southern states. But since then, most white Southern voters have shifted allegiances to the Republican Party, while black and Hispanic voters moved further toward the left.

That shift did not fully manifest itself until congressional redistricting last year, Nathaniel Persily, a professor at Columbia Law School, wrote in a to-be-released article in the Stanford Law & Policy Review. There have been more challenges to the Voting Rights Act in the past two years than in the previous 45 years combined. Among those challenges have been a redistricting case in Alabama and Florida's purging of voter lists of non-citizens earlier this year.

"We're seeing people who previously supported the act and what it stood for are now bringing challenges to it," said Ryan Haygood, director of the Political Participation Group at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.

The law is politically inconvenient for the GOP in 2012.  The only way they stay in power with their decrepit, bigoted ideas is if the population allowed to vote stays increasingly white and wealthy and restricted to the fanatical partisans on the right who vote to keep it that way.  So, the Civil Rights Act, preventing states like Texas from implementing near permanent Jim Crow laws on minorities, has to go.

They may get their wish.

More Homeless Shenanigans

A growing number of cities want to tackle the problem of homelessness by outlawing what are known as "acts of daily living" — sleeping, eating and panhandling in public. In Philadelphia, a new rule is targeting not the homeless but those who feed them.

When Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter announced the ban on serving food in public parks last March, he said moving such services indoors was part of an effort to raise standards for the homeless.

"I believe that people, regardless of their station in life, should be able to actually sit down, at a table, to a meal inside, away from the heat and the cold, the rain and the snow, the vehicle exhaust and all the other distractions of everyday city life," Nutter said at a press conference.

Indoor facilities, Nutter says, also make it easier to connect homeless people with other supportive services.

But many advocates for the homeless are skeptical. "We at the national level see this as a trend much more about restricting activities that really define the homeless experience," says Neil Donovan, the executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless.

 

"We do feel that communities are really, really frustrated with repeated efforts to end homelessness that have been quite unsuccessful," says Donovan. "But we push back and say, you know, that doesn't mean that you simply throw your hands in the air and make criminals out of homeless people."

He argues that the rules, and a growing number of ordinances against loitering, panhandling and camping, don't just marginalize the homeless. "It really takes the focus off of solutions and puts it much more on restrictions," he says.

In the church, groups offer meals three times a week, and at the same time connect guests with on-site health care and social service providers.

Philadelphia's ban was scheduled to go into effect June 1, but the city is delaying enforcement until a judge addresses a lawsuit filed by religious groups that claim it is unconstitutional.

Already, though, the city's hungry say it's getting harder to find meals in their usual spots. Chiekh Dai was waiting at the foot of a statue near Museum Row on a recent afternoon when no one showed up to serve.

They don't get it.   The homeless aren't reading papers and getting Groupon notices about who has the best daily special today.  They depend on the kindness of others, and by hindering that with a bunch of red tape the cities are making it more difficult.  Seriously, are we supposed to believe this is because they feel they deserve better service?  It all sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me.

You can't end homelessness.  You can't make everyone fit your ideals.  What you can do, however, is treat them like people, value them because nobody else has, and give them the best help possible.

Jay Nixon Signs Away Privacy

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. - Missouri law enforcement agencies could track people's cellphone signals during emergencies more easily under a measure signed by Gov. Jay Nixon.

The legislation enacted Friday requires phone companies to cooperate with police by tracking cellphone signals of 911 callers, or by pinging a phone's location when there is danger of death or serious physical injury.

The law was prompted by the 2007 killing of 18-year-old Kelsey Smith, who was abducted from a shopping center parking lot in Overland Park, Kan. Her body was found four days later in a wooded area in Missouri.

Sponsoring House member Jeanie Lauer, a Republican from Blue Springs, has said Smith might have been found faster if authorities had been better able to track her cellphone signals. 

She might have been found faster.  Maybe.  But because of this maybe, we will most assuredly have abuse of power, and invasion of privacy.

Thanks, Jay.  Glad to see you haven't changed a bit.  Freedom doesn't mean squat when it stands  in the way of government or law enforcement. We're not supposed to believe that there were restrictions put into place to protect us, are we?

Natalie Wood's Death Certificate Changed

(CBS News) LOS ANGELES - Natalie Wood's 1981 drowning is no longer being classified as an "accident" on her death certificate.

In a move that comes more than 30 years after the actress' mysterious drowning off Catalina Island, the Los Angeles County Coroner's Office is now re-categorizing her death as "undetermined."

A source who has discussed the case with authorities confirmed to CBS News that the Coroner's Office is changing the official cause of death, and said it is just one step in the continuing probe of the actress' death.

So what exactly is going on?  Nobody knows.  There have been hints of new evidence and testimony, but nothing can be proven yet.  Still, something must have happened for the cause of death to change.

I was just a little girl when Natalie Wood died.  Still, I remember everyone (by which I mean every single person around me) was convinced there was foul play.  By the time I was old enough to check for myself, it was hopelessly hashed to death, any facts buried in the babble of conspiracy theory.

If someone killed her or allowed her to drown, I hope they find out, for her sake and her family.

As Stupid As Stupid Gets

(AP) GREENFIELD, Ind. - A baby girl, just a few months old, has died, and a 16-month-old is hospitalized, in separate incidents near Indianapolis in which children were found trapped in cars during record-setting 105-degree heat.

The baby who died was found by police this afternoon in Greenfield, about 25 miles west of Indianapolis. Police say it appears she had been left in the car for "an extended period of time." Police aren't providing further information, saying the investigation is continuing.

Another child, also in Indiana, was rescued when police were alerted and broke out the car window.  The 16-month-old began having seizures when brought into an air-conditioned place to cool off.  At this time, there is no update on her condition.

Normally, I roll my eyes when I hear someone say "then do it to them so they learn their lesson" but in this case... I think it may be appropriate.  Pets and kids are dying because self-centered jackasses don't care about their misery and danger.  Unforgivable and completely preventable.  Instead of jail time, maybe these useless bags of crap should have to endure what they allow other living creatures to endure, pain and misery, seizures, cracked skin and burns, and eventually death.

The Cake We're Apparently Supposed To Be Eating Is A Lie

The R-Money Koch Block 2012 Tour hit the Hamptons this weekend, and America’s most precious resource, its clueless rich assholes, have something to say to the bourgeoisie.

A New York City donor a few cars back, who also would not give her name, said Romney needed to do a better job connecting. “I don’t think the common person is getting it,” she said from the passenger seat of a Range Rover stamped with East Hampton beach permits. “Nobody understands why Obama is hurting them. 

“We’ve got the message,” she added. “But my college kid, the baby sitters, the nails ladies—everybody who’s got the right to vote—they don’t understand what’s going on. I just think if you’re lower income—one, you’re not as educated, two, they don’t understand how it works, they don’t understand how the systems work, they don’t understand the impact.”

On one level, she’s right.   We’re just too dumb to get how we’ve been mauled economically by people in Range Rovers with East Hampton beach permits.  If we truly understood that nearly 95% of the economic income growth over the last few years went to just the top 1% in this country, if we truly grasped what that meant, we’d be out there playing “Who Wants To Pitchfork A Millionaire?” Sadly, a great many of us are engaged in Stockholm Syndrome with these bozos.

Sharon Zambrelli voted for Obama in 2008 but has been disappointed with his handling of the economy and leadership style. “I was very disenchanted with the political process and he gave me hope,” she said, but ultimately: “He’s just a politician,” she said, an “emperor with no clothes.” 

The Zambrellis scoffed at attempts by the Democrats—who mocked Romney in an ad Sunday as “great for oil billionaires, bad for the middle class”—to wage class warfare.  “Would you like to hear about the fundraisers I went to for him?” Sharon Zambrelli said of Obama. “Do you have an hour? ... All the ones in the city—it was all of Wall Street.”

“It’s not helping the economy to pit the people who are the engine of the economy against the people who rely on that engine,” Michael Zambrelli said as the couple waited in their SUV for clearance into the Creeks shortly after the candidate’s motorcade flew by and entered the pine-tree lined estate. “He’s basically been biting the hand that fed him in ‘08. ... I would bet 25% of the people here were supporters of Obama in ‘08. And they’re here now.”

I wonder honestly how the Zambrellis have been doing in the last 4 years, because they seem to be saying that 90%+ growth going to people like them is unacceptably low and Obama needs to go because of it.  Loosely translated, I’m seeing “Well McCain/Palin were basically insane and we weren’t going to help them, but this Obama guy actually is talking about making us pay more here.  Who does he think he is?”

And we’re all really just ungrateful, stupid bastards to these people, and they really don’t understand why more of us aren’t eager to worship them as the “engines of the economy” when the reality is our consumer-based economy has been driven by the middle class buying crap at a breakneck pace and putting money in the pockets of these people, and as far as they’re concerned they just don’t need us anymore.  Hey, to an extent they’re right.  There’s plenty of people in China and India and Brazil and whatnot who will buy their corporate crap these days.  We’ve made ourselves obsolete in the grand corporate crap consumption game.  It’s gone global.

If we understood anything, we’d understand that they can make our lives even more miserable and they’ve signaled their intent to do just that.  Of course, if we really understood things, we’d be out there making things extremely miserable for the gilded class while we still could.  It hasn’t occurred to any of them that the rest of us are in trouble, and don’t see why we can’t be like them if we just played our cards right.  Pretty easy to make a royal flush or three with 47 cards in your hand, of course.  It’s a little harder when you have two in your hand and the cost of drawing from the deck is a couple decades of student loan debt or heading out to the Sandbox and hoping most of you comes back in useable condition.

But we’re just all parasites and looters and moochers to these guys, and you’d think with all these gifts they have, one of them would look up how things like this tend to go in the history books, and it always ends up badly for the guys on top of the pyramid when the revolution flips the whole rotten mess over.

Something’s got to give, and soon.

Exchange Of Fire

The Republicans are moving on to the next step in dismantling the post-SCOTUS Affordable Care Act in a presumptive President Obama second term:  wrecking the insurance exchange subsidies.

At issue is whether the subsidies will be available in exchanges set up and run by the federal government in states that fail or refuse to establish their own exchanges. 

Critics say the law allows subsidies only for people who obtain coverage through state-run exchanges. The White House says the law can be read to allow subsidies for people who get coverage in federal exchanges as well. 

The law says that “each state shall” establish an exchange. But Washington could be running the exchanges in one-third to half of states, where local officials have been moving slowly or openly resisting the idea. 

The dispute has huge practical implications. The Congressional Budget Office predicts that 23 million uninsured people will gain coverage through exchanges and that all but five million of them will qualify for subsidies, averaging more than $6,000 a year per person. Subsidies, in the form of tax credits, will be available to people with incomes from the poverty level up to four times that amount ($23,050 to $92,200 for a family of four). 

And if the states that refuse to set up exchanges have the federal government come in to do it for them, and then the GOP turns around and sends yet another case to the Supreme Court where the federal exchanges can't work because there's no subsidies, it will be a disaster.  And yes, the Republicans figure all the people screwed out of health insurance will blame Obama and the Democrats.

So yeah, they don't mind playing with people's lives.  It's politics, dammit.

StupidiNews!

• Tennis star Roger Federer captured his seventh Wimbledon title on Sunday over Britain's Andy Murray, tying Pete Sampras for the most career tournament wins at the All-England Club.
• With steep cuts to public health in the state, Florida officials are accused of covering up the worst outbreak of tuberculosis in the US in two decades.
• UN Special Envoy Kofi Annan will fly to Syria's capital, Damascus, to try to halt the fighting and get President Bashar al-Assad to sign on to a new transitional government plan.
• The worst US drought in 25 years is set to cause corn prices to skyrocket amid record global demand as the Midwest continues to bake under record heat.
• Apple is stepping away from environmental-friendly certification for a number of products because of "easy disassembly" requirements, something Apple famously continues to resist.

Last Call

Our liberal media in action, with the hard-hitting stories that America deserves.

A source points out that President Barack Obama's new typeface is Revolution Gothic, a style inspired by retro Cuban propaganda posters. Who vets the fonts?

Ahh, but there's hope.  Team Obama has figured out that Buzzfeed is nothing more than Drudge Lite, and treats them like it.

(Obama press secretary Ben LaBolt emails: “Your GOP operative should have had the courtesy to stay sober before noon, and BuzzFeed should go back to labeling cat slideshows.”)  

Well played, Ben LaBolt.  Well played.  Appropriate response to complete nonsense.  Don't give BuzzFeed the time of day.  It's not like they're news.

America's Most Precious Resource Speaks Out

America's billionaires are terrified, folks.  You can't appreciate what it's like to have everyone in the country despise you because you're worth 10 figures.  It hurts your feelings, because you non-billionaire people are subhuman monsters, frankly.  Meet Kentucky Point Oh One Percenter B. Wayne Hughes in this Jon Ronson GQ piece.

"I live my life paying my taxes and taking care of my responsibilities, and I'm a little surprised to find out that I'm an enemy of the state at this time in my life," he says.

He has a big, booming voice like an old-school billionaire, not one of those nerdy new billionaires.

"Has anyone said that to your face?" I ask him.

"Nobody has to," says Wayne. "Just watch what they're doing."

"You mean the Occupy Wall Street crowd?"

"Those guys are a bunch of jerks," Wayne mutters, giving a dismissive wave that says, They're just a sideshow. "Politically I'm on the enemy list. I've lived my whole life doing what I thought was right, and now I'm an enemy of the state." 

He's on the enemy list, he thinks.  He believes his children and grandchildren are under threat from you and me.  He pays his taxes, which are of course too high.  Above all, he can't comprehend why anyone would ever dislike anyone who spends millions of dollars on Karl Rove's Crossroads outfit.  They're the good guys.  It's the other 99% who are the problem.

Wayne says he never once stopped to contemplate the amount of money he was making. "I was just looking at getting the best locations I could and getting the buildings opened and getting the tenants and getting the cash flow and on and on," he says.

"You never once thought, 'This money is cascading in. I am worth 4 BILLION DOLLARS'?" I ask.

He shakes his head. "I don't spend any time at all thinking about my personal wealth. I suppose if I had nothing, I might think, 'I have nothing.' But when we decided to go public and I saw how much money there was, I was very surprised." 

Just an ordinary guy.  He's shocked he's worth billions.  Not enough to give it up of course.  But he's shocked that anyone would make a big deal about it.  The problem in America isn't guys like me, he says.  It's the rest of you lazy, worthless slobs.

Wayne's avuncular manner deserted him when he talked about what to do about the have-nots. "I remember an advertisement with an Indian in a canoe in a river," he said, "and tears are running down his face because he sees all the trash in the water, and he sees what's happening. That's how I feel about America. It's an emotional thing for me." He paused, and that's when he said, "I'm a little surprised to find out that I'm an enemy of the state at this time in my life. They talk about your 'fair share.' 'Are you paying your fair share?' Fair is in the eyes of the beholder." He paused. "I hope I don't come off like some big person...so conservative.... I believe in spreading it around, but I believe in doing it myself."

"So the trash in the river is higher taxes?" I asked.

"It's the idea of entitlement," he snapped. "That idea wasn't there in the history of this country. When the politicians said, 'Everybody is entitled to a house,' you saw what happened. And now you have 'Everybody is entitled to go to college.' Which is stupid! When I went to college, I had to drive a truck to pay. I had a partial scholarship, but I took care of myself."

"So you're saying everybody is entitled to college but should have to pay his or her own way?" I asked.

"Some people don't belong in college!" he said. "That should occur to you." 

Some people don't belong in college.  Wayne figures since he's the one paying the taxes, it should be up to him to decide.  Going to have to pull up that ladder at some point, folks.  And who does Wayne mean by "some people?"

Guess.

Wayne talked to me about "derelicts on welfare" who check themselves into the hospital because they're "bored" and "want feeding," and "we're paying for all that activity." He said too much tax money is spent on "guys going to chiropractors, guys getting massages! On us! Give me a break. Guys getting Viagra!" He talked about "Los Angeles bus drivers who are on permanent stress leave because someone spat on them when they got on the bus, and now they're emotionally upside down. More than half the bus drivers are out on stress leave! Systems like that cannot work!" It seemed as if, for Wayne's philosophy to work, he needed to believe that those who don't make it deserve their ill fortune. 

Later, I hunt for data that back up Wayne's feckless-bus-driver nightmare scenario. I can't find any. I do find something else, though—plenty of statistics showing that a guy with Wayne's level of wealth has never had it so good in America. And yet of all the people I interview, Wayne is the only one who seems angry about the politics of his situation...

It's really quite simple.   The human mind has to rationalize that what that person is doing is good.  Wayne does reveal that he does donate to charities, but he wants to perform those works of philanthropy in absolute secrecy.  If people knew he donated, why everyone would want his money.  That's all the unwashed care about.  Wayne honestly believes he's doing good, that his money means he gets to make macro level decisions about American society, and that he above all should.

So he donates.  He believes the worst about American society and its people, and anyone besides himself.  The difference is he has the resources to do something about it.  He believes taxes are wrong, because he's rich enough to decide where he wants his money to go to and wants to decide who is worthy, not the government.  Everyone else?  Well, he watches enough FOX News to be scared of the rabble.  Above all, they're parasites on his family and his way of life.

And he's going to do something about them, dammit.

Someone Else Sees It, Too!

I have been a critic of the Springfield News-Leader for some time.  I haven't minced words when I called them out for failing to report news and act as a glorified AP repeated instead.  They have had chances to improve this community and done well, but they have dropped the ball a time or two as well.

I'm not the only one who sees it, either.

Recently, the local police came under scrutiny for breaking up a homeless camp.  From what we could tell, it was done with the least amount of compassion and thought possible.  One policeman said the majority of the homeless would have warrants out for their arrest, which brings in the article Kathleen Faddis mentions in her letter to the editor.  The police officer didn't say he misspoke, the reporter offered this excuse on his behalf, editorializing what should have been a factual breakdown of the events.

Lord knows I get what it's like to be judged for a poor word choice.  I don't believe that's what happened here.  For years, I have been annoyed with the newspaper sugar coating and using kid gloves when it comes to police and city council behavior.

Politicians are good at ducking responsibility. Note how often they use the phrase “mistakes were made” in their confessions of misdeeds, rather than accepting blame. I understand beat reporters have to maintain a relationship with their sources, but reporters are expected to tell the truth, even when it’s uncomfortable to do so. Leave the language that sidesteps the truth to the politicians and public relations people. Reporters should be holding them accountable, not holding their hand.

Well said.  Here's hoping the News-Leader ups their game a notch and goes for honest descriptions over neutral safety.

And A Bible Thumping Good Time Was Had By All

A woman was arrested for throwing her bible and striking Reverend Leon Taylor in the head.  He said she had been voted out of the church.  Either way, when the police have to come to the church, them Duke boys better be findin' some cover, or something like that.

During the church confrontation, “Ms. Garrett took her Bible and threw it at Mr. Taylor hitting him in the face.” Taylor then took a swing at Garrett, but did not make contact.

After a brief detour to a local hospital, Garrett was transported by a sheriff’s deputy to the county jail, where she was charged with “assault on the preacher Mr. Taylor.” In a TV interview, Garrett copped to striking Taylor in the head. “He’s got the demon in him,” she explained. 

Well, now that he's been diagnosed  we can all just put this behind us.  Seriously, people like this do more harm to religious tolerance than a whole string of abortion ads.  He took a swing at her, which both surprised me and made me wonder what role he played in pushing Garrett to the point of exaggeration.

Let's be good kids and not hit at church, shall we?  It's the least we can ask, since it's impossible for someone to disagree without being evil and deserving violence, at least in the eyes of the devout (and slightly insane).

Squad Level Reductions In Manpower

I don't see how Best Buy stays in business much longer, frankly.  The Geek Squad?  Man down, man down...

About 600 Geek Squad tech support jobs will be eliminated along with 1,800 store positions by Aug. 1, said the person, who declined to be identified because the plans are private. Those eliminated will qualify for job-placement assistance and severance packages, said the person.

The job cuts come as Best Buy struggles to compete with the likes of Amazon.com Inc., Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) In March, Best Buy reported a $1.7 billion fourth-quarter loss and said it would close 50 big-box stores.

Best Buy is trying to thwart the so-called showrooming phenomenon -- when customers try out gadgets in a store and then buy them online -- by adopting Apple-style minimalism rather than its traditional big-box approach.

Best Buy also is remaking the Geek Squad. Technicians will staff in-store booths to fix simple problems -- think Genius Bar -- instead of providing service in customers’ homes.

The Geek Squad job cuts will affect only technicians who provide in-home service, said the person. 

Yeah, I could have told you those mobile Geek Squad techs were toast.  I'm honestly surprised that Best Buy employed so many of them.  Here's a hint, guys.  Pretty soon there won't be a Geek Squad, and pretty soon there won't be a Best Buy.  It's just how the business model goes, guys.  Gotta make those profits for shareholders by selling goods manufactured for a dollar an hour, we can't pay people $9.50 an hour to sell them. 

After all, the new boss did promise change!  We can afford to pay him several million, but that of course means 2,400 have to go.  So sorry.

Hope you didn't have a career path or anything guys.  Maybe you should be the CEO next time.

Last Call

America!  No more Thad McCotter, Guitar Hero to kick around anymore as he's resigned from Congress.  I'm sure you're all heartbroken, too.  If only you could remember who this knucklehead was.

After nearly 26 years in elected office, this past nightmarish month and a half have, for the first time, severed the necessary harmony between the needs of my constituency and of my family. As this harmony is required to serve, its absence requires I leave.

The recent event's totality of calumnies, indignities and deceits have weighed most heavily upon my family. Thus, acutely aware one cannot rebuild their hearth of home amongst the ruins of their U.S. House office, for the sake of my loved ones I must "strike another match, go start anew" by embracing the promotion back from public servant to sovereign citizen.

I do not leave for an existing job and face diminishing prospects (and am both unwilling and ill-suited to lobby), my priorities are twofold: find gainful employment to help provide for my family; and continue to assist, in any way they see fit, the Michigan Attorney General's earnest and thorough investigation, which I requested, into the 2012 petition filing.

By the way, the whole "sovereign citizen" movement he references transitioning into?  A bunch of dangerous anarchist militia/white supremacist nutjobs, meaning that McCotter should have resigned over the comment anyway, he's either too ignorant of the very real danger that the movement possesses...

...or he's completely cognizant.   Then again, I vote for ignorance, since this moron couldn't even figure out how to get himself on his own primary ballot and lost.

And thus with a grand total of 3 posts, I retire his tag,  Bye, Thad.

You know, unless he does something even more stupid.

Keystone To The Election

It's entirely possible that 2012 could come down to Pennsylvania and the state's new voter identification suppression law that will be in effect in November.  It could cost Democrats as much as 750,000 votes in November...and the state.

And maybe the country.

As has been noted nationally, the estimated 750,000 voters who do not have state-issued IDs in Pennsylvania surpasses President Obama’s margin of victory in 2008. Given that many of the voters without ID are in poor and minority communities, Democrats assume the law will impact their turnout the most. And they’re not the only ones: the Republican leader of the state House, who helped shepherd the legislation onto the books, recently boasted that it will “allow” Mitt Romney win the Keystone State.

Democrats now have to make sure their voters know about the law, know if they comply, know how to get into compliance if they’re not — and do it all before Election Day. This could be a steep climb. TPM talked asked five Pennsylvania Democratic voters at Obama’s Pittsburgh rally Friday about their state’s voter ID law. Only one knew it existed.

“I heard about it in Florida but not here,” said Martin Hoberman, a voter from the Pittsburgh area.
Jim Burn, the state Democratic Party chair, says his forces are ready to integrate dealing with the voter ID law into their existing GOTV operations. But he acknowledged that he’s got another layer to contend with if that law remains in effect.

“Yes, many voters are not aware of it,” he said. “All the more responsibility on us that a.) they’re aware of it and b.) we give them what they need to get out and exercise their constitutional rights.”
How does he do that? There’s no list of record for voters who don’t have proper ID, so Democrats have to go about creating their own list of targets who fit the profile for lacking the identification based on geography, income and other means. Then they hit them with the voter ID messaging as part of standard field operations.

“When we’re going do to door, which we’re doing anyway to talk about A, B, C and D, we’re now talking about A, B, C, D and E,” Burn said.

He urged Democrats to keep calm and carry on.

“We’re taking it very seriously, but I don’t want voters to overreact to it,” he said. “If you don’t have what you need to vote and you’re not sure, reach out to us. And if you don’t reach out to us, don’t worry, we’re going to be coming to you anyway.”

More of that outreach is coming.  But that's money, time, and effort that has to be spent rather than getting new voters into the booth in November.   What I fear is that come November 8th, two news stories will be prevalent:  Hundreds of thousands of minority voters turned away in voter ID states like Pennsylvania, and Republicans gaining control of the Senate and White House.  One leads to the other.

And as far as Republicans are concerned, it's working as intended.