So, no tax increases, no mandates, limiting malpractice awards and grants to states that come up with their own plans. Let me translate for you:Mr. Boehner said Sunday the Republican bill would extend health-insurance coverage to "millions" of Americans but wouldn't try to match the scope of the House Democratic bill unveiled last week. The Democratic legislation, if passed, is estimated to expand coverage to more than 30 million Americans now without insurance. Its estimated gross cost is $1.055 trillion over 10 years.
"What we do is we try to make the current system work better," Mr. Boehner, of Ohio, said on CNN's "State of the Nation." The GOP plan would likely be less costly to taxpayers and involve less government intrusion into the private sector. Mr. Boehner said the bill would take "a step-by-step approach" to expanding coverage.
It would, among other things, propose new limits on medical malpractice lawsuits and make it easier for individuals and small businesses to pool resources to purchase insurance.
Mr. Boehner said the Republican bill would also propose grants for states that use "innovative" solutions to expand coverage. He pointed to states that have created special "high-risk pools" to provide insurance to individuals with pre-existing conditions.
He said the bill wouldn't raise taxes, nor mandate that individuals and businesses purchase insurance, as the Democratic legislation does.
"We don't have a plan. We're giving money to states to come up with their own solutions. Also health care costs are all the fault of lawyers."
I'm sure punting to the states will help. Not like they are facing major financial issues or anything.
Posts
1 comment:
Well, you do have to give Boner credit: it's almost marginally better than the last couple of plans.
1) Nothing
2) Nothing and hope noone notices.
Post a Comment