What motivates this kind of talk and behavior is called eliminationism: a politics and a culture that shuns dialogue and the democratic exchange of ideas in favor of the pursuit of outright elimination of the opposing side, either through suppression, exile, and ejection, or extermination.
Rhetorically, eliminationism takes on certain distinctive shapes. It always depicts its opposition as beyond the pale, the embodiment of evil itself, unfit for participation in their vision of society, and thus worthy of elimination. It often further depicts its designated Enemy as vermin (especially rats and cockroaches) or diseases, and disease-like cancers on the body politic. A close corollary—but not as nakedly eliminationist—are claims that opponents are traitors or criminals and that they pose a threat to our national security.
Eliminationism is often voiced as crude "jokes," a sense of humor inevitably predicated on venomous hatred. And such rhetoric—we know as surely as we know that night follows day—eventually begets action, with inevitably tragic results.If this sounds familiar to you, it should: it's the primary theme of Beck's recent CPAC speech where he compared progressivism to a "cancer" that was destroying America. He also called for it to be "eradicated".
And that's a deadly theme we see in nearly all the most dangerous Tea Party rhetoric. Progressives exist to be destroyed, to be excised from America and the world. How do you reason with people who want to destroy you, don't even see you as human?
No comments:
Post a Comment