One of the week's more relevant political debates has been over tax policy -- specifically the Republican argument that Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy have to be extended. Pressed on how those cuts would be paid for, the Republican leadership has insisted, evidence be damned, that tax cuts don't need to be offset by anything.I guess not. Didn't stop him from suggesting we needed those tax cuts and that they would pay for themselves when Bush talked Congress into enacting them, in fact Greenspan's testimony was repeatedly cited by Republicans and Democrats and the President and the Village that they tax cuts would pay for themselves, which they most certainly did not.
Alan Greenspan is rarely helpful in debates like these, which is why it came as something of a pleasant surprise to see him reject the entire Republican line of thinking. (via Atrios)
Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, whose endorsement of George W. Bush's 2001 tax cuts helped persuade Congress to pass them, said lawmakers should allow the cuts to expire at the end of the year."They should follow the law and let them lapse," Greenspan said in an interview on Bloomberg Television's "Conversations with Judy Woodruff," citing a need for the tax revenue to reduce the federal budget deficit.It's worth noting that when it comes to tax cuts, Greenspan went even further than most Democrats want to go, arguing that all of Bush's tax cuts have to expire on schedule, including those for the middle class.
The former Fed chairman said he wants to see tax rates return to '90s levels in order to curtail the deficit.
I guess he hasn't heard the news about tax cuts paying for themselves?
All of a sudden, Greenspan wants all the tax cuts to expire.
Funny how that works.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment