Then Burgess fielded a suggestion that the House move to impeach Obama. "It needs to happen, and I agree with you it would tie things up," he reportedly said. "No question about that."
The U.S. Constitution, in Article II, Section 4, requires a conviction on "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" before an office-holder can be impeached. President Obama faces no such charges.
Asked to clarify, "Burgess said he wasn't sure whether the proper charges to bring up articles of impeachment against Obama were there, but he didn't rule out pursuing such a course," reporter Aman Batheja concluded.
To repeat, a sitting member of Congress believes the President should be impeached, but can't give an actual legal or Constitutional reason as to why. Not a single one. But he should be just because. Well, given the GOP's history on dealing with Obama, I think Burgess has a reason, but it's not polite to mention it in public.
Here's a hint, it has to do with President Obama's party, or more likely the most obvious of his presidential firsts.
Just sayin'.
No comments:
Post a Comment