As Justin Raimondo at Antiwar.com points out,
The president's left-wing supporters want action on the Israeli-Palestinian front, and expectations are high: a new understanding of the "special relationship" is a prerequisite for success. Yet the administration is extraordinarily sensitive to criticism from the Israel lobby, which has gone on a jihad against Freeman, throwing everything in the book at him, and then some. The chosen theme of their hate campaign, in this case, is to portray Freeman as an agent of foreign powers – Saudi Arabia and China, so far. This charge, coming from the Israel lobby, is a hoot and a half – especially when one considers that the first voice to be raised against Freeman belonged to none other than Steve Rosen, the former AIPAC top lobbyist awaiting trial on charges of espionage on behalf of Israel (see this timeline).And now we see the other shoe drop: drop Freeman, then drop the Rosen case.
Once again, one has to ask who is running America's foreign policy, and the answer isn't America. I'm hoping that Holder will resist the WaPo's ludicrous call to do it, but I would bet money that the case will be dismissed pretty soon.
After all, Israel's new government has a United States of America to run.
2 comments:
I've got to say... I really agree with Glenn Greenwald on this issue. Of course Irael has a right to exist. And of course it should be safe... but to make it so that Israel's national interests are, by proxy, *America's* national interests is not really... in our national interest.
Agreed. *No* country should have that power over America.
Post a Comment