According to a pair of senior Capitol Hill staffers, one from each chamber, House and Senate Democrats are “almost certain” to negotiate informally rather than convene a formal conference committee. Doing so would allow Democrats to avoid a series of procedural steps--not least among them, a series of special motions in the Senate, each requiring a vote with full debate--that Republicans could use to stall deliberations, just as they did in November and December.Well holy hell, looks like the Dems have finally figured out that the Republicans are trying to kill the bill. Only took you guys six months. Sheesh.
“There will almost certainly be full negotiations but no formal conference,” the House staffer says. “There are too many procedural hurdles to go the formal conference route in the Senate.”
One reason Democrats expect Republicans to keep trying procedural delays is that the Republicans have signaled their intent to do so. On Christmas Eve, when the Senate passed its bill, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell memorably vowed in a floor speech that “This fight isn't over. My colleagues and I will work to stop this bill from becoming law."
“I think the Republicans have made our decision for us," the Senate staffer says. "It’s time for a little ping-pong.”
“Ping pong” is a reference to one way the House and Senate could proceed. With ping-ponging, the chambers send legislation back and forth to one another until they finally have an agreed-upon version of the bill. But even ping-ponging can take different forms and some people use the term generically to refer to any informal negotiations.
Whatever form the final discussions take place, a decision to bypass conference would undoubtedly expedite the debate, clearing the way for final passage (if not signing) by the end of January. And, as long as both chambers still get their say, that's a good thing.
The real question is who will be the first Winger to play the facism card AND to link it to "passing the bill before Scott Brown wins in Massachusetts"?
My money's on Mustard Boy...
1 comment:
There was no way to not put this through the Senate, I think the point where this could have been sped up the most was when it was stuck in the Senate Finance Committee (probably trimming a month or two). But really, we have 3 branches of government, and this is just the way it works.
I think the leadership was always planning to skip as much obstruction as possible (which is why they slotted health care for reconciliation, even if they didn't use it). I wonder if Joseph Cao will be in the conference discussions, being the only Republican to vote for the bill from either house....
Post a Comment