Do...what? What should be be doing? Very few people seem to have those answers, but they sure are mad.
The response to the disaster by energy giant BP, President Obama and the federal government all get terrible grades from Americans in a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll.So, suddenly now everyone's mad and worried about the environment:
Nearly three-fourths of those surveyed Monday and Tuesday say BP is doing a "poor" or "very poor" job in handling the calamity. Six of 10 say that of the federal government. And a 53% majority give Obama a poor rating.
The catastrophe has boosted concern about the environment over development of new energy supplies -- a long-time balancing act in American politics.So, maybe the American people want the federal government to take over the effort to clean up?
Now, a majority say protection of the environment should be given priority, "even at the risk of limiting energy supplies."
The 55%-39% divide on that question was a reversal of American views in March, before the April 20 explosion sent crude oil spewing into the gulf. Then, by 50%-43% Americans said development U.S. energy supplies should be given priority, "even if the environment suffers to some extent."
On a similar question, those surveyed divided 50%-43% over whether the environment should be protected "even at the risk of curbing economy growth" or if growth should be given priority, "even if the environment suffers to some extent."
That's a big swing from March, too. Then, by 53%-38% Americans chose economic growth as their priority.
Who should be in charge of cleanup efforts? More than two-thirds say BP, not the federal government.Umm...okay... well, Obama can at least stop offshore drilling, right?
There is still majority support for increasing offshore drilling for oil and gas in U.S. coastal areas: 52% favor, 44% oppose. Just one in five oppose all offshore drilling.Right then. Carry on, America!
[UPDATE] A TPM reader has some interesting perspective on "top kill".
On having Obama "do more," WTF is he supposed to do? Everybody seems to be calling for more fire in his belly and scary, threatening speeches. What does that accomplish? It's like people want him to do a dramatic speech like post-9/11 about bringing the criminals to justice. It does nothing to actually plug the damn well. The government does not have the expertise to do more to stop this gusher. It's in BPs interest to stop the gusher. All the conspiracy theories about wanting to preserve the well for future production are technically wrong and ignore that NOBODY in the industry benefits from this gusher continuing. BP wants what everybody else wants, though I'll concede that I suspect dispersants are about killing life where it's less easily photographed. Dispersants aside, the only conflict of interest is regarding the causes of the blowout, not the capping of the well. Fed investigations are already taking care of that part.Do read the whole letter.
2 comments:
This is the pretty direct consequence of a media deciding to keep analysis out of their reporting. When there are no lines between actions and circumstances then there is no reason for people to reassess their beliefs once the facts as we know them change.
Polls don't change law...
Obama is in charge, much like with a company the CEO's ass is on the line with a mistake, so should Obama. He's the leader right? That means you take the good and the bad, not the good and finger point the bad and expect others to defend you.
Post a Comment