Israel should launch a pre-emptive strike to prevent arch-foe Iran from going nuclear, a former head of Israel's Mossad intelligence agency said on Monday.Part of me honestly believes that Netanyahu's final trump card over Obama is this right here. We get Israeli officials and former Israeli officials saying this whenever Obama decides to play hardball. "Gee it would be a shame if we attacked Iran. You'd be forced to fight our war for us. Do you really want to do that? Better think twice, then."
"I am of the opinion that, since there is an ongoing war, since the threat is permanent, since the intention of the enemy in this case is to annihilate you, the right doctrine is one of pre-emption and not of retaliation," Shabtai Shavit told a conference.
Shavit, who served as chief of Israel's foreign spy agency from 1989 to 1996, was speaking at a conference held at the hawkish Bar Ilan University outside Tel Aviv.
"To use retaliation as the main strategy means to sit idly and wait until the enemy comes to attack you," a university statement quoted Shavit as saying.
"But we are dealing with an enemy that plans all the time and waits for the opportunity to arise in order to attack, so what is the point, even morally, to wait and do something only when we are attacked," he said.
As long as doing whatever Israel wants has 85 US Senators supporting it, Obama knows Bibi doesn't have to hold all the cards. He just has to be willing to play exactly one.
1 comment:
Amazing, the one thing that unites our Senate...and you're upset about it. Bipartisan support of Israel, not saying "We'll go to war for you gaiz!".
Putting that aside do you think Iran is interested in having nukes? I do. And if there were a country who has repeatedly said they want my country "wiped off the map" I would be preparing for the worst, and also would be preparing for preemptive strike to protect the people of my country.
Post a Comment