Manny Ramirez and David Ortiz, the sluggers who propelled the Boston Red Sox to end an 86-year World Series championship drought and to capture another title three years later, were among the roughly 100 Major League Baseball players to test positive for performance-enhancing drugs in 2003, according to lawyers with knowledge of the results.I can't say I'm shocked about Manny or Big Papi, really. Juicing has been going on for years in baseball, and I'm not honestly sure anyone really cares too much anymore.Some of baseball’s most cherished storylines of the past decade have been tainted by performance-enhancing drugs, including the accomplishments of record-setting home run hitters and dominating pitchers. Now, players with Boston’s championship teams of 2004 and 2007 have also been linked to doping.
Baseball first tested for steroids in 2003, and the results from that season were supposed to remain anonymous. But for reasons that have never been made clear, the results were never destroyed and the first batch of positives has come to be known among fans and people in baseball as “the list.” The information was later seized by federal agents investigating the distribution of performance-enhancing drugs to professional athletes, and the test results remain the subject of litigation between the baseball players union and the government.
Five others have been tied to positive tests from that year: Barry Bonds, Alex Rodriguez, Sammy Sosa, Jason Grimsley and David Segui. Bonds, baseball’s career home runs leader, was not on the original list, although federal agents seized his 2003 sample and had it retested. Those results showed the presence of steroids, according to court documents.
The information about Ramirez and Ortiz emerged through interviews with multiple lawyers and others connected to the pending litigation. The lawyers spoke anonymously because the testing information is under seal by a court order. The lawyers did not identify which drugs were detected.
Unlike Ramirez, who recently served a 50-game suspension for violating baseball’s drug policy, Ortiz had not previously been linked to performance-enhancing substances.
Scott Boras, the agent for Ramirez, would not comment Thursday.
Asked about the 2003 drug test on Thursday in Boston, Ortiz shrugged. “I’m not talking about that anymore,” he said. “I have no comment.”
Maybe that comes from not growing up in a major league city, nearest MLB games for me growing up were the Atlanta Braves. Minor league baseball we had buckets of in western NC however.
Having lived in Minneapolis and now Cincinnati, I do notice baseball more, but people in the Twin Cities cared much more about hockey, and here in Cincy we're more worried about Pete Rose than Manny. Still, that does throw a wrench into that 2004 Red Sox miracle season. They may have beaten the Curse, but they may never lick the Asterisk.
1 comment:
I have understood the rabid opposition to roids, or any performance enhancing drug. So what? Steroid use is not going to help you see a 95 MPH fastball any better. That ball is still moving 95 MPH and it is going by very quickly. If anything you might get the bat around a little quicker so it will travel a bit farther but that is about it. You still have to react, and steroids won't help you in that case.
I guess I can't get worked up about it. Wow, imagine that, pro athletes trying to gain a competitive advantage. (They need to spend a little more time with the Goldman Sachs guys to learn how to have the system set up in their favor so that anything they do is legal, and anything they want to do in the future that is now illegal can be magically made legal.)
Post a Comment