Thursday, September 2, 2010

The GOP Agenda Is Simple

Roll back the New Deal with the help of conservative Dems and that Obama guy.
As Republican pols from Barry Goldwater to George W. Bush can tell you, going after Social Security and Medicare is really bad politics. And they've yet to come up with a gimmick, whether it's "partial privatization" or grandfathering existing beneficiaries, to make major changes in these programs popular (I seriously doubt the very latest gimmick, "voucherizing" Medicare, will do any better once people understand the idea). Indeed, Republicans notably engaged in their own form of "Medagoguery" by attacking health care reform as a threat to Medicare benefits.

Yet the sudden Tea Party-driven return to fiscal hawkery among Republicans, particularly if it's not accompanied by any willingness to consider tax increases or significant defense spending cuts, will drive the GOP again and again to "entitlement reform." In Senate candidates like Rand Paul and Sharron Angle and now Joe Miller, we are seeing the return of a paleoconservative perspective in the GOP that embraces the destruction of the New Deal/Great Society era's most important accomplishments not just as a matter of fiscal necessity but as a moral imperative.
And the best part is Democrats are most likely going to help them do it as the confluence of the Club For Growth folks and the Religious Right converge on the notion that entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid are morally repulsive because only evil people would want to "bankrupt the country" through debt. Digby catches what this means:
This is language of self-sacrifice for the greater good, which I'm not sure has been used by the far right in the context of destroying the social safety net. (Fiscal scolds pitch generational warfare, but it's not quite the same thing. This has a broader reach.) And the Religious Right hasn't gone this way before, instead worrying themselves about the culture wars. I've heard from an expert on the Religious Right that this is, in fact, an appealing approach to the evangelical side of the movement and very successfully marries the libertarian and Religious Right wings of the tea party. (And the Village will love it --- they've been calling for poor people to sacrifice for years. They can write breathless columns about how everyone has to pull together while they travel to and from green rooms in the back of a limousine.)
This new phase of the conservative movement has the simple goal of preparing average Americans to be cut off at the knees while the richest among us return to the days of the Divine Right of Kings. God made them rich.  God made you poor.  Maybe if you sacrifice more, you'll be rich someday too.  This is the rightful way things should be.

And the great theft of wealth in the country to the nobles at the top of the food chain continues unabated.


In Ur Blog Eatin Waffles (Accept no fail imitations) said...

Well, while I may not agree with what their plan may be, something does need to be done about SS, Medicaid/care as they are unsustainable. Curbing the amount of illegals taking advantage of this will help but that's barely even a band-aid.

Now that's not to say there shouldn't be programs in place to help those who have lost their jobs (not fired due to their own actions) and to help those who otherwise couldn't afford health-care.

God made them rich. God made you poor. Maybe if you sacrifice more, you'll be rich someday too. This is the rightful way things should be.

Um, isn't that in a simplistic way the Capitalist system? High risk for high reward or failure? Some say by the grace of God others just call it luck. If you want to play it safe you can but may not reap the rewards of those who have taken the risk. If there's no possible benefit for taking a high risk, then why take it? That mentality will lead to the bottom falling out of our society.

Basically to sum everything up in 3 simplistic words: Redistribution of wealth

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need

Unknown said...

I see Zandar is also ignoring the overwhelming evidence that TARP and the stimulus did nothing but push the depression from 2009 to 2011...

Zandar said...

Wait, what?

So Danny boy, you're saying that we should have done nothing and instead of being down 8 million jobs, we'd be down 12 million jobs or more, an unemployment rate approaching 12%, and none of the base problems causing the mess solved in any way?

Sure. Bread lines and riots would have been much better.

Unknown said...

Actually you are the one saying that because any more spending is politically impossible that we're heading for bread lines and riot anyway. Sooooo if you are right Obama gets thrown out of office for the depression & if I am right then the Republicans prove tax cuts and spending cuts work and sweep 2012.

So we agree that Obama is a one term president!!!


Related Posts with Thumbnails