A Test Run For Tester's Run

Montana Republicans are considering changing the election rules for Democratic Sen. Jon Tester's reelection race in 2024 and only his 2024 election in order to prevent third party voters from giving Tester another sub-50% win, and then changing the rules back in 2025.

 

A Republican-backed bill to create a “jungle primary” that would box-out third party candidates in the next U.S. Senate race in Montana has advanced.

Senate Bill 566 would create a primary system in which the top two candidates who win the most votes advance to the general election, regardless of party. Right now, each party has separate primaries and advances a winner.

Sen. Greg Hertz, a Republican from Polson, said the bill aims to ensure the most popular candidate wins for a high profile office.

“These are six year terms and to me, if we’re going to send someone to Washington, D.C., they should have the majority support of our voters,” Hertz said.

Hertz called his bill a test run as it includes a sunset date in 2025.

The bill would take effect ahead of the 2024 campaign, when U.S. Sen. Jon Tester is up for reelection. Tester is the last remaining statewide elected Democrat and his bid to hold office is expected to be highly competitive.

In 2012, Tester faced both a Republican and Libertarian candidate. Rep. Hertz highlighted that election saying Tester won with less than 50% of the vote.

Senate Minority Leader Pat Flowers pointed out that in 2022, U.S. Congressman Ryan Zinke also won with less than 50% of the vote due to a third-party candidate, but the bill won’t address U.S. House races. Flowers said it’s obvious the bill is targeted at Tester.

“Let’s not kid ourselves, this is just brazen partisanship targeting a single race. This isn’t fair, this isn’t what Montanans want, they don’t want one party rule,” Flowers said.

The Montana Libertarian Party said in a statement that they oppose the bill, calling it an unabashed attempt to eliminate Libertarian access to the ballot. Libertarians tend to pull votes from Republican candidates.

 

The one race in the state where third-party voters might actually make a difference in favor of the Democrat is Tester's 2024 run, so Republicans have to interfere to make sure that doesn't happen, and they're not even being subtle about it. They no longer have to, because it's not like Republicans will pay any sort of price for it and most likely they get a Senate win out of the deal.

That's how politics work in red states. I'm not saying Democrats haven't done similar nonsense, but at least they made it consistent, as with California's jungle primary system affecting all House and Senate races, not just to get rid of one Republican.